Simple adaptations to the Templeton model for IVF outcome prediction make it current and clinically useful

Human Reproduction

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 2971-2978

  Arvis, P ^a   Lehert, P ^b,c   Guivarc'H Leveque A ^a  

^a Clinique la Sagesse   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

ICSI; IVF; live birth; predictive model

Indexed keywords

FOLLITROPIN; MUELLERIAN INHIBITING FACTOR;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LIVE BIRTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALE INFERTILITY; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANCY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SMOKING HABIT; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; TEMPLETON MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 84866389106     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des283     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Development Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2008. http://www.R-project.org.
2. Abdalla H, Thum MY. An elevated basal FSH reflects a quantitative rather than qualitative decline of the ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod 2004; 19:893-898.
3. Augood C, Duckitt K, Templeton AA. Smoking and female infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 1998; 13:1532-1539.
4. Bancsi LF, Hus AM, Den Ouden CT, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, Blankenstein MA, Te Velde ER. Basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels are of limited value in predicting ongoing pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2000;73:552-557.
5. Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 2006; 12:685-718.
6. Cai QF, Wan F, Huang R, Zhang HW. Factors predicting the cumulative outcome of IVF/ICSI treatment: a multivariable analysis of 2450 patients. Hum Reprod 201l;26:2532-2540.
7. Chuang CC, Chen CD, Chao KH, Chen SU, Ho HN, Yang YS. Age is a better predictor of pregnancy potential than basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels in women undergoing in vitro fertilization, Fertil Steril 2003;79:63-68.
8. Commenges-Ducos M, Tricaud S, Papaxanthos-Roche A, Dallay D, Horovitz J, Commenges D. Modelling of the probability of success of the stages of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer stimulation, fertilization and implantation. Hum Reprod 1998; 13:78-83.
9. Coppus SF, Van der Veen F, Opmeer BC, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM. Evaluating prediction models in reproductive medicine. Hum Reprod 2009; 24:1774-1778.
10. Craft I, Forman R. Analysis of IVF data. Lancet 1997;349:283.
11. Ferlitsch K, Sator MO, Gruber DM, Rucklinger E, Gruber CJ, Huber JC. Body mass index, follicle-stimulating hormone and their predictive value in in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004;21:431-436.
12. Grynberg M, Fanchin R. Evaluation du statut folliculaire ovarien. In: Sifer C, Poncelet C (eds). Physiologie pathologie et thérapie de la reproduction chez lhumain. Springer, 2011, 199-208.
13. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996; 15:361-387.
14. Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Generalized additive models\some applications. j Am Stat Assoc 1987;82:37l-386.
15. Hosmer DWLS. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley and Sons, 2000.
16. Hunault CC, Ekemans MJC, Pieters MHEC, te Velde ER, Habbema JD, Fauser BCJM, Macklon NS. A prediction model for selecting patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for elective single embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2002;77:725-732.
17. Lee TH, Liu CH, Huang CC, Hsieh KC, Lin PM, Lee MS. Impact of female age and male infertility on ovarian reserve markers to predict outcome of assisted reproduction technology cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2009a; 17:7-100.
18. Lee TH, Liu CH, Huang CC, Hsieh KC, Lin PM, Lee MS. Impact of female age and male infertility on ovarian reserve markers to predict outcome of assisted reproduction technology cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2009b; 7:100.
19. Leushuis E, Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Bossuyt PM, Ekemans MJ, van der Veen F, Mol BW, Hompes PG. Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 2009; 15:537-552.
20. Lintsen AM, Ekemans MJ, Hunault CC, Bouwmans CA, Hakkaart L, Habbema JD, Braat DD. Predicting ongoing pregnancy chances after IVF and ICSI: a national prospective study. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2455-2462.
21. Lintsen AM, Braat DD, Habbema JD, Kremer JA, Ekemans MJ. Can differences in IVF success rates between centres be explained by patient characteristics and sample size? Hum Reprod 2010;25:110-117.
22. Minaretzis D, Harris D, Alper MM, Mortola JF, Berger MJ, Power D. Multivariate analysis of factors predictive of successful LB in in vitro fertilization (IVF) suggests strategies to improve IVF outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998; 15:365-371.
23. Ottosen LD, Kesmodel U, Hindkjaer J, Ingerslev HJ. Pregnancy prediction models and eSET criteria for IVF patients-do we need more information? J Assist Reprod Genet 2007;24:29-36.
24. Pencina MJ, DAgostino RB Sr, DAgostino RB Jr, Vasan R.S. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Statist Med 2008;27:157-172.
25. Sharif K, Elgendy M, Lashen H, Afnan M. Age and basal follicle stimulating hormone as predictors of in vitro fertilization outcome, Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105:107-112.
26. Smeenk JM, Stolwijk AM, Kremer JA, Braat DD. External validation of the TM for predicting success after IVF. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:1065-1068.
27. Smotrich DB, Widra EA, Gindoff PR, Levy MJ, Hall JL, Stillman RJ. Prognostic value of day 3 estradiol on in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1995;64:l136-1140.
28. Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr, Borsboom GJ, Ekemans MJ, Vergouwe Y, Habbema JD. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54:774-781.
29. Stolwijk AM, Zielhuis GA, Hamilton CJ, Straatman H, Hollanders JM, Goverde HJ, van Dop PA, Verbeek AL. Prognostic models for the probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and the importance of testing their predictive value. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:2298-2303.
30. Stolwijk AM, Wetzels AM, Braat DD. Cumulative probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection according to a woman's age, subfertility diagnosis and primary or secondary subfertility. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:203-209.
31. Swets J. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988; 240:1285-1293.
32. Templeton A, Morris JK, Parslow W. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Lancet 1996;348:1402-1406.
33. Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Ekemans MJ, Habbema JD, Bossuyt PM, Hompes PG, van der Veen F, Mol BW. Do clinical prediction models improve concordance of treatment decisions in reproductive medicine? BJOG 2006; 113:825-831.
34. Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Ekemans MJ, Habbema JD, Hompes PG, Burggraaff JM, Oosterhuis GJ, Patrick MM, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F et a\. Obesity affects spontaneous pregnancy chances in subfertile, ovulatory women. Hum Reprod 2008;23:324-328.
35. Van Loendersloot LL, van Wely M, Limpens L, Bossuyt PM, Repping S, van der Veen F. predictive factors in in vitro fertilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16:S77-S89.
36. Van Loendersloot LL, van Wely M, Repping S, van der Veen F. Templeton prediction model underestimates IVF success in an external validation. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;22:597-602.