Damping-adjusted combination rule for the response spectrum analysis of base-isolated buildings

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 163-182

  Muscolino, Giuseppe ^a   Palmeri, Alessandro ^b   Versaci, Claudia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MESSINA   (Italy)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

BIS (base isolation system); CQC (complete quadratic combination) rule; DCF (damping correction factor); Random vibration theory; RSM (response spectrum method)

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; MODAL ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

BASE ISOLATION SYSTEMS; COMPLETE QUADRATIC COMBINATIONS; DAMPING CORRECTION; RANDOM VIBRATION THEORY; RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHODS;

DAMPING;

BUILDING; DAMPING; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EIGENVALUE; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC ISOLATION; SPECTRUM; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; VIBRATION;

EID: 84872023667     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2200     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Kelly JM. Earthquake-resistant Design with Rubber. Springer-Verlag: London, 1997.
2. Naeim F, Kelly JM. Design of Seismic Isolated Structures: From Theory to Practice. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999.
3. Ryan KL, Chopra AK. Estimation of seismic demands on isolators based on nonlinear analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering 2004; 130: 392-402.
4. Kelly JM, Takhirov SM. Tension buckling in multilayer elastomeric isolation bearings. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures 2007; 2: 1591-1605.
5. Toopchi-Nezhad H, Tait MJ, Drysdale RG. Testing and modeling of square carbon fiber-reinforced elastomeric seismic isolators. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2008; 15: 876-900.
6. Kelly JM, Konstantinidis D. Effect of friction on unbonded elastomeric bearings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2009; 135: 953-960.
7. Khanlari S, Ashkezari GD, Kokabi M, Kashani MR. Fiber-reinforced nanocomposite seismic isolators: design and manufacturing. Polymer Composites 2010; 31: 299-306.
8. Tsai HC, Kelly JM. Seismic response of heavily damped base isolation systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1993; 22: 633-645.
9. Kelly JM. The role of damping in seismic isolation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28: 3-20.
10. Hall JF. Discussion: the role of damping in seismic isolation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28: 1717-1720.
11. Du Y, Li H, Spencer Jr BF. Effect of non-proportional damping on seismic isolation. Journal of Structural Control 2002; 9: 205-236.
12. Newmark NM, Hall WJ. Earthquake Spectra and Design. EERI Monograph Series: Oakland, CA, 1982.
13. rd US National Conference on Earthquake Engineer-ing, South Carolina, 1986: 1107-1116.
14. Wu JP, Hanson RD. Inelastic response spectra with high damping. Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE) 1989; 115: 1412-1431.
15. Ramirez OM, Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS, Kircher CA, Chrysostomou CZ. Elastic and inelastic seismic response of buildings with damping systems. Earthquake Spectra 2002; 18: 531-547.
16. European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, 2004 Edition.
17. International Code Council. International Building Code, 2006 Edition.
18. Lin YY, Chang KC. A study on damping reduction factor for buildings under earthquake ground motions. Journal of Structural Engineering 2003; 129: 206-214.
19. Lin YY, Miranda E, Chang KC. Evaluation of damping reduction factors for estimating elastic response of structures with high damping. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34: 1427-1443.
20. Weitzmann R, Ohsaki M, Nakashima M. Simplified methods for design of base-isolated structures in the log-period high-damping range. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35: 497-515.
21. Rosenblueth E. A basis for aseismic design. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1951.
22. Wilson EL, Der Kiureghian A, Bayo EP. A replacement for the SRSS method for seismic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1981; 9: 187-192.
23. Der Kiureghian A. Structural response to stationary excitation. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division (ASCE) 1980; 106: 1195-213.
24. Der Kiureghian A. A response spectrum method for random vibration analysis of MDF systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1981; 9: 419-435.
25. Der Kiureghian A, Nakamnura Y. CQC modal combination rule for high-frequency modes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1993; 22: 943-956.
26. Penzien J. Evaluation of building separation distance required to prevent pounding during strong earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1997; 26: 849-858.
27. Cacciola P, Colajanni P, Muscolino G. Combination of modal responses consistent with seismic input representation. Journal of Structural Engineering 2004; 130: 47-55.
28. Palmeri A. Correlation coefficients for structures with viscoelastic dampers. Engineering Structures 2006; 28: 1197-1208.
29. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33: 903-927.
30. Singh MP. Seismic response by SRSS for nonproportional damping. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division (ASCE) 1980; 106: 1405-1419.
31. Villaverde R. Rosenblueth's modal combination rule for systems with non-classical damping. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1988; 16: 931-942.
32. Sinha R, Igusa T. CQC and SRSS methods for non-classically damped structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1995; 24: 615-619.
33. Falsone G, Muscolino G. Cross-correlation coefficients and modal combination rules for non-classically damped systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28: 1669-1684.
34. Falsone G, Muscolino G. New real-value modal combination rules for non-classically damped structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33: 1187-1209.
35. Muscolino G. Dynamic response of multiply connected primary secondary systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 19: 205-216.
36. Caughey TK, O'Kelly MEJ. Classical normal modes in damped linear dynamic systems. Journal of Applied Mechanics (ASME) 1965; 32: 583-588.
37. Presidency of the Italian Council of Ministers. First elements concerning general criteria for the seismic classification of the national territory and for technical norms for construction in seismic zones, 2003 (in Italian).
38. Warburton GB, Soni SR. Errors in response calculations for non-classically damped structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1977; 5: 365-376.
39. Claret AM, Venancio-Filho F. A modal superposition pseudo-force method for dynamic analysis of structural systems with non-proportional damping. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1991; 20: 303-315.
40. Muscolino G, Palmeri A. An earthquake response spectrum method for linear light secondary substructures. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 2007; 44: 193-211.
41. Muscolino G, Palmeri A. The elastic response spectrum method extended to the seismic analysis of light secondary substructures. In: New Trends in Seismic Design of Structures, Lagaros ND, Tsompanakis Y, Papadrakakis M (Eds). Stirling, In production: Saxe-Coburg.
42. Vanmarcke, EH. On the distribution of the first-passage time for normal stationary random processes. Journal of Applied Mechanics (ASME) 1975; 42: 215-220.
43. Vanmarcke EH. Structural response to earthquakes. In: Seismic Risk and Engineering Decisions, Chapter 8, Lomnitz C, Rosenblueth E (Eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1976.
44. Billah KYR, Shinozuka M. Numerical method for colored-noise generation and its application to a bistable system. Physical Review A 1990; 42: 7492-7495.