Simplified methods for design of base-isolated structures in the long-period high-damping range

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 497-515

  Weitzmann, Ruediger ^a   Ohsaki, Makoto ^b   Nakashima, Masayoshi ^b  

^a BAUHAUS UNIVERSITY WEIMAR   (Germany)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Base isolation; Equivalent linear systems; Period dependency; Response spectrum reduction

Indexed keywords

DAMPING; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ESTIMATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

EQUIVALENT LINEAR SYSTEMS; PERIOD DEPENDENCY; RESPONSE SPECTRUM REDUCTION;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33645512802     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.544     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Pan P, Zamfirescu D, Nakashima M, Nakayasu N. Base-Isolation design practice in Japan: introduction to the post-Kobe approach. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2005; 9:147-171.
2. Kawabata I, Takayama M, Nishikawa Y, Yamazaki E, Isshiki Y. High-rise building with base-isolation system using sliding bearings and rubber bearings. Proceedings of Structural Engineering World Congress, Yokohama, Japan, 2002; T2-1-a4.
3. Yamamoto H, Teramoto T, Takayama M, Kitamura H. Design of seismic isolated building of 4 seconds natural period. Proceedings of Structural Engineering World Congress, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A., 1998; 163-166.
4. ICC. International Building Code. International Code Council, Whittier, 2003.
5. BCJ. Structural Provisions for Building Structures. Building Center of Japan, Tokyo, 2000 (in Japanese).
6. CEN. Final Draft of Eurocode 8: Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance - Part I: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. European Committee for Standardization, December 2003.
7. Bommer JJ, Elnashai AS, Weir AG. Compatible acceleration and displacement spectra for seismic design codes. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, 2000; Paper No. 207.
8. Bommer JJ, Mendis R. Scaling of spectral displacement ordinates with damping ratios. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:145-165.
9. Lin YY, Chang KC. Study on damping reduction factor for buildings under earthquake ground motions. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2003; 129(2):206-214.
10. Lin YY, Miranda E, Chang KC. Evaluation of damping reduction factors for estimating elastic response of structures with high damping. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:1427-1443.
11. ATC. ATC-40 Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, 1996.
12. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:561-582.
13. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33:903-927.
14. Franchin P, Monti G, Pinto PE. On the accuracy of simplified methods for the analysis of isolated bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:363-383.
15. Kani N, Koshika N, Midorikawa M, liba. M, Wada A. Technical background on the Japanese linearized equivalent method for seismically isolated buildings. Proceedings of Structural Engineering World Congress, Yokohama, Japan, 2002; T2-1-b-2.
16. Lin YY, Chang KC. An improved capacity spectrum method for ATC-40. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32:2013-2025.
17. Chopra AK, Goel RK. Capacity-Demand-Diagra Methods for estimating seismic deformations of inelastic structures: SDF systems. Report No. PEER-1999/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, April 1999.
18. Vidic T, Fajfar P, Fischinger M. Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1994; 23:507-521.
19. Zhao JX, Zhang J. Inelastic demand spectra for bi-linear seismic isolation systems based on nonlinear time history analyses. JSSI 10th Anniversary Symposium on Performance of Response Controlled Buildings, Yokohama, Japan, 17-19 November 2004.
20. Kelly JM. The role of damping in seismic isolation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:3-20.
21. Naeim F, Kelly J. Design of Seismic Isolated Structures - From Theory to Practice. Wiley: New York, 1999.
22. Kikuchi M, Aiken ID, Kitamura Y, Ueda M. Seismic response of isolated structures depending on hysteresis models for isolation devices. JSSI 10th Anniversary Symposium on Performance of Response Controlled Buildings, Yokohama, Japan, 17-19 November 2004.
23. CSI. CSI Analysis Reference Manual for SAP2000®, ETABS®, and SAFE™. Computers and Structures, Inc.: 1995 University Avenue Berkeley, CA, U.S.A., September 2004.
24. Nakashima M, Matsumiya T, Asano K. Comparison in earthquake responses of steel moment frames subjected to near-fault strong motions recorded in Japan, Taiwan, and the U.S. International Workshop on Annual Commemoration of Chi-Chi Earthquake, Taipei, Taiwan, 18-20 September 2000; 112-123.
25. Somerville P, Smith N, Punyamurthala S, Sun J. Development of ground motion time histories for the Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project. SAC Background Document, Report No. SAC/BD09/04, Sacramento, CA, 1997.
26. Hanson RD, Soong TT. Seismic design with supplemental energy dissipation devices. Monographs of Earthquake Engineering Research Institute EERI 2001; MNO-8.
27. Lam N, Wilson J, Hutchinson G. The ductility reduction factor in the seismic design of buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27:749-769.
28. Jangid RS, Kelly JM. Base isolation for near-fault motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:691-707.
29. Takewaki I. Frequency domain modal analysis of earthquake input energy to highly damped passive control structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33:575-590.
30. Mavroeidis GP, Dong G, Papageorgiou AS. Near-fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33: 1023-1049.
31. Chakraborti A, Gupta VK. Scaling of strength reduction factors for degrading elasto-plastic oscillators. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:189-206.
32. Miranda E. Site-dependent strength-reduction factors. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1993; 119:3503-3519.
33. Kawashima K, Aizawa K. Modification of earthquake response spectra with respect to damping ratio. Proceedings of the Third U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Charleston, SC, 1986; 1107-1116.
34. Sadek F, Mohraz B, Riley MA. Linear procedures for structures with velocity-dependent dampers. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2000; 126:887-895.
35. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures - Theory and Application to Earthquake Engineering (2nd edn). Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001.
36. Hancock J, Bommer JJ. The effective number of cycles of earthquake ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:637-664.
37. Du Y, Li H, Spencer Jr BF. Effect of non-proportional damping on seismic isolation. Journal of Structural Control 2002; 9:205-236.
38. Khanlari Y,, Ghafory-Ashtiany M. New approaches for non-classically damped system eigenanalysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:1073-1087.
39. Newmark NM, Hall WJ. Earthquake Spectra and Design. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, CA, 1982.