Seismic loss estimation of non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 297-310

  Baradaran Shoraka, M ^a   Yang, T Y ^a   Elwood, K J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Earthquake engineering; Non ductile reinforced concrete buildings; Performance based engineering; Seismic analysis; Seismic loss; Structural collapse

Indexed keywords

CIVIL ENGINEERING; CONCRETE BUILDINGS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; LOSSES; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMOLOGY;

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; PERFORMANCE-BASED ENGINEERING; SEISMIC ANALYSIS; SEISMIC LOSS; STRUCTURAL COLLAPSE;

DUCTILITY;

COLLAPSE; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; NUMERICAL MODEL; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; VULNERABILITY;

CALIFORNIA; LOS ANGELES [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84872007069     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2213     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Comartin CD, Anagnos T, Faison H, Greene M, Moehle J. The Concrete Coalition: Building a Network to Address Nonductile Concrete Buildings. 14 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Innovation Practice Safety, International Association for Earthquake Engineering, 2008.
2. Cornell CA, Krawinkler H. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News 2000; 3: 1-3.
3. Yang TY, Moehle J, Stojadinovic B, Der Kiureghian A. Seismic performance evaluation of facilities: Methodology and implementation. Journal of Structural Engineering 2009; 135(10): 1146-1154.
4. Applied Technology Council 58. Development of next-generation performance-based seismic design procedures for new and existing buildings, Applied Technology Council, 2010. [10 September 2010].
5. ASCE. Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 41-06. American Society of Civil Engineers/Structural Engineering Institute: Reston, Virginia, 2006.
6. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA P695 Recommended Methodology for Quantification of Building System Performance and Response Parameters, Project ATC-63, Prepared by the Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA 2009.
7. Yavari S, Elwood KJ, Wu C. Collapse of a nonductile concrete frame: Evaluation of analytical models. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2009; 38(2): 225-241.
8. Bradley BA, Lee DS. Component correlations in structure-specific seismic loss estimation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2010; 39(3): 237-258. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.937.
9. Goulet CA, Haselton CB, Mitrani-Reiser J, Beck JL, Deierlein GG, Porter KA, Stewart JP. Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building - From seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36(13): 1973-1997. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.694.
10. Solberg KM, Dhakal RP, Mander JB, Bradley BA. Computational and rapid expected annual loss estimation methodologies for structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008; 37(1): 81-101. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.746.
11. Cornell CA. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1968; 58(5): 1583.
12. Abrahamson NA. Selecting and scaling accelerograms for dynamic analysis. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Swiss Society for Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Geneva, 2006.
13. Haselton CB, Baker J, Bozorgnia Y, Goulet C, Kalkan E, Luco N, Shantz T, Shome N, Stewart J, Tothong P. Evaluation of ground motion selection and modification methods: predicting median interstory drift response of buildings. PEER (2009/01), 2009.
14. Jalayer F, Cornell CA. Alternative non-linear demand estimation methods for probability-based seismic assessments. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2009; 38(8): 951-972.
15. Vamvatsikos D, Allin Cornell C. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(3): 491-514.
16. Haselton CB, Baker JW, Liel AB, Deierlein GG. Accounting for ground-motion spectral shape characteristics in structural collapse assessment through an adjustment for epsilon. Journal of Structural Engineering 2011; 137: 332.
17. Elwood KJ. Modelling failures in existing reinforced concrete columns. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 2004; 31(5): 846-859.
18. Yavari S. Shaking table tests on the response of reinforced concrete frames with non-seismic detailing. PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2011.
19. Yavari S, Elwood KJ, Lin S, Wu C, Hwang S, Moehle JP. Experimental study on dynamic behavior of multi-story reinforced concrete frames with non-seismic detailing. 2009 ATC and SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures, December 9, 2009 - December 11, American Society of Civil Engineers, San Francisco, CA, United states, 2009; 489-499.
20. Baradaran Shoraka M. Collapse assessment of non-ductile reinforced concrete moment frames. ongoing PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2012.
21. OpenSees. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation _OpenSees_ framework-Version 2.1.0. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, 2010. [10 September 2010].
22. de Souza RM. Force-based finite element for large displacement inelastic analysis of frames. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, United States -- California, 2000.
23. Alath S, Kunnath SK. Modeling inelastic shear deformation in RC beam-column joints. Engineering Mechanics Proceedings of 10th Conference, May 21-24, ASCE, Boulder, CO, USA, 1995; 822-825.
24. Bazzurro P, Cornell CA. Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1999; 89(2): 501-520.
25. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER). PEER NGA database flatfile. 2010. [10 September 2010].
26. Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ. Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters 1997; 68(1): 94-127.
27. Porter KA, Beck JL, Shaikhutdinov RV. Sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables. Earthquake Spectra 2002; 18(4): 719-743. DOI: 10.1193/1.1516201.
28. Krawinkler H. Van Nuys Hotel Building Testbed Report: Exercising Seismic Performance Assessment. PEER Report 2005/11. College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 2005.
29. Aslani H. Probabilistic earthquake loss estimation and loss disaggregation in buildings. PhD thesis, Stanford University, United States -- California, 2005.