Migration of cells in a social context

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 129-134

  Vedel, Søren ^a   Tay, Savaş ^b   Johnston, Darius M ^c,d   Bruus, Henrik ^a   Quake, Stephen R ^c,d  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell migration; Microfluidics; Physical modeling; Single cell analysis

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOPHYSICS; CELL DENSITY; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL TRANSPORT; COLLISIONALLY ACTIVATED DISSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MICROFLUIDICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOPODIUM; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; VELOCITY;

BIOPHYSICAL PROCESSES; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL COUNT; CELL MOVEMENT; MICROFLUIDICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT;

PSEUDOPODA;

EID: 84871993335     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1204291110     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Orlic D, et al. (2001) Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature 410(6829):701-705. (Pubitemid 32290358)
2. Abercrombie M, Heaysman JEM (1953) Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. I. Speed of movement of chick heart fibroblasts in relation to their mutual contacts. Exp Cell Res 5(1):111-131.
3. Abercrombie M, Heaysman JE (1954) Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. II. Monolayering of fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res 6(2):293-306.
4. Yates CA, et al. (2009) Inherent noise can facilitate coherence in collective swarm motion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(14):5464-5469.
5. Ballerini M, et al. (2008) Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(4):1232-1237. (Pubitemid 351397036)
6. Helbing D, Farkas IJ, Vicsek T (2000) Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407(6803):487-490.
7. Martin P, Parkhurst SM (2004) Parallels between tissue repair and embryo morphogenesis. Development 131(13):3021-3034. (Pubitemid 39077428)
8. Lecaudey V, Gilmour D (2006) Organizing moving groups during morphogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18(1):102-107. (Pubitemid 43107615)
9. Alberts B, et al. (2007) Molecular Biology of the Cell (Garland Science, New York), 5th Ed.
10. Friedl P, Wolf K (2003) Tumour-cell invasion and migration: Diversity and escape mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer 3(5):362-374. (Pubitemid 37328856)
11. Selmeczi D, Mosler S, Hagedorn PH, Larsen NB, Flyvbjerg H (2005) Cell motility as persistent random motion: Theories from experiments. Biophys J 89(2):912-931. (Pubitemid 41098978)
12. Li L, Cox EC, Flyvbjerg H (2011) 'Dicty dynamics': Dictyostelium motility as persistent random motion. Phys Biol 8(4):046006.
13. Arrieumerlou C, Meyer T (2005) A local coupling model and compass parameter for eukaryotic chemotaxis. Dev Cell 8(2):215-227. (Pubitemid 40197738)
14. Andrew N, Insall RH (2007) Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions. Nat Cell Biol 9(2):193-200. (Pubitemid 46420862)
15. Keren K, et al. (2008) Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells. Nature 453 (7194):475-480. (Pubitemid 351733321)
16. Melvin AT, Welf ES, Wang Y, Irvine DJ, Haugh JM (2011) In chemotaxing fibroblasts, both high-fidelity and weakly biased cell movements track the localization of PI3K signaling. Biophys J 100(8):1893-1901.
17. Lauffenburger DA, Horwitz AF (1996) Cell migration: A physically integrated molecular process. Cell 84(3):359-369. (Pubitemid 26058561)
18. DiMilla PA, Barbee K, Lauffenburger DA (1991) Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. Biophys J 60(1):15-37.
19. Schreiber CH, Stewart M, Duke T (2010) Simulation of cell motility that reproduces the force-velocity relationship. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(20):9141-9146.
20. Munevar S, Wang Y, Dembo M (2001) Traction force microscopy of migrating normal and H-ras transformed 3T3 fibroblasts. Biophys J 80(4):1744-1757. (Pubitemid 32280990)
21. Vicsek T, Czirók A, Ben-Jacob E, Cohen I, Shochet O (1995) Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Phys Rev Lett 75(6):1226-1229.
22. Szabó B, et al. (2006) Phase transition in the collective migration of tissue cells: experiment and model. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 74(6 Pt 1):061908.
23. Gail MH, Boone CW (1970) The locomotion of mouse fibroblasts in tissue culture. Biophys J 10(10):980-993.
24. Angelini TE, et al. (2011) Glass-like dynamics of collective cell migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(12):4714-4719.
25. Reffay M, et al. (2011) Orientation and polarity in collectively migrating cell structures: Statics and dynamics. Biophys J 100(11):2566-2575.
26. Vitorino P, Meyer T (2008) Modular control of endothelial sheet migration. Genes Dev 22(23):3268-3281.
27. Trepat X, et al. (2009) Physical forces during collective cell migration. Nat Phys 5: 426-430.
28. Angelini TE, Hannezo E, Trepat X, Fredberg JJ, Weitz DA (2010) Cell migration driven by cooperative substrate deformation patterns. Phys Rev Lett 104(16):168104.
29. Tambe DT, et al. (2011) Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces. Nat Mater 10(6):469- 475.
30. Travis J (2011) Mysteries of the cell: Cell biology's open cases. Science 334(6059):1051.
31. Waters CM, Bassler BL (2005) Quorum sensing: Cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21:319-346. (Pubitemid 41740638)
32. Nadell CD, Xavier JB, Levin SA, Foster KR (2008) The evolution of quorum sensing in bacterial biofilms. PLoS Comp. Biol. 6:e14.
33. Gregor T, Fujimoto K, Masaki N, Sawai S (2010) The onset of collective behavior in social amoebae. Science 328(5981):1021-1025.
34. Gómez-Sjöberg R, Leyrat AA, Pirone DM, Chen CS, Quake SR (2007) Versatile, fully automated, microfluidic cell culture system. Anal Chem 79(22):8557-8563. (Pubitemid 350171363)
35. Skotheim JM, Di Talia S, Siggia ED, Cross FR (2008) Positive feedback of G1 cyclins ensures coherent cell cycle entry. Nature 454(7202):291-296. (Pubitemid 352009994)
36. Tay S, et al. (2010) Single-cell NF-κB dynamics reveal digital activation and analogue information processing. Nature 466(7303):267-271.
37. Czirók A, Schlett K, Madarász E, Vicsek T (1998) Exponential distribution of locomotion activity in cell cultures. Phys Rev Lett 81:3038-3041. (Pubitemid 128631855)
38. Wang Y, Teraoka I, Hansen FY, Peters GH, Hassager O (2010) Mean span dimensions of ideal polymer chains containing branches and rings. Macromolecules 44:403-412.
39. Carmona-Fontaine C, et al. (2008) Contact inhibition of locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration. Nature 456(7224):957-961.
40. King SJ, et al. (2011) β1 integrins regulate fibroblast chemotaxis through control of NWASP stability. EMBO J 30(9):1705-1718.
41. Samadani A, Mettetal J, van Oudenaarden A (2006) Cellular asymmetry and individuality in directional sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(31):11549-11554. (Pubitemid 44182489)
42. Yamao M, Naoki H, Ishii S (2011) Multi-cellular logistics of collective cell migration. PLoS ONE 6(12):e27950.
43. Saintillan D, Shelley MJ (2008) Instabilities and pattern formation in active particle suspensions: kinetic theory and continuum simulations. Phys Rev Lett 100(17):178103.
44. Lambert G, Liao D, Austin RH (2010) Collective escape of chemotactic swimmers through microscopic ratchets. Phys Rev Lett 104(16):168102.
45. Graner F, Glazier JA (1992) Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended Potts model. Phys Rev Lett 69(13):2013-2016.
46. Larripa K, Mogilner A (2006) Transport of a 1D viscoelastic actin-myosin strip of gel as a model of a crawling cell. Physica A 372(1):113-123. (Pubitemid 44436777)