The discriminative properties of the SF-6D compared with the SF-36 and ODI

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 60-64

  Carreon, Leah Y ^a   Berven, Sigurd H ^b   Djurasovic, Mladen ^a   Bratcher, Kelly R ^a   Glassman, Steven D ^a  

^a NORTON LEATHERMAN SPINE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

discriminative properties; health utility; lumbar fusion; patient reported outcomes; psychometrics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PAIN; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SHORT FORM 36; SHORT FORM 6D; SPINE FUSION;

ADULT; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84871986972     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182609df6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SK. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summaries Scales: A User's Manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute; 1994.
2. Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Pollard WE, et al. The sickness impact pro-file: validation of a health status measure. Med Care 1976; 14: 57-67.
3. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, et al. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1980; 34: 281-6. (Pubitemid 11207401)
4. Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC, et al. Refinement of the SRS-22 health-related quality of life questionnaire function domain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: 593-7.
5. Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, et al. Studies in the modified scoliosis research society outcomes instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: 2164-9 (Pubitemid 37140208)
6. Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991; 14: 409-15.
7. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 2940-52; discussion 2952.
8. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980; 66 (8): 271-273. (Pubitemid 11234479)
9. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of low-back pain. Part II: development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983; 8: 145-50. (Pubitemid 13089566)
10. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983; 8: 141-4. (Pubitemid 13089565)
11. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002; 21: 271-92. (Pubitemid 34143147)
12. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001; 33: 337-43. (Pubitemid 32675374)
13. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
14. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 171-8. (Pubitemid 17007065)
15. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989; 27: S178-89.
16. Ware JE. SF-36 health survey update. Spine 2000; 25: 3130-9. (Pubitemid 32042945)
17. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990; 28: 632-42.
18. Liang MH, Larson MG, Cullen KE, et al. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. Arth Rheum 1985; 28: 542-7. (Pubitemid 15109906)
19. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1967.
20. Fayers MP, Machin D. Quality of Life, the Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2nd ed. West Sussex: Wiley; 2007.
21. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine 2000; 25: 3115-24. (Pubitemid 32042943)
22. Baker D, Pynsent P, Fairbank J. The Oswestry Disability Index revisited. In: Roland M, Jenner J, eds. Back Pain: New Approaches to Rehabilitation and Education. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press; 1989: 174-86.
23. Kopec J, Esdaile J. Spine update: functional disability scales for back pain. Spine 1995; 20: 1943-9.
24. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play [review]. Health Policy 1996; 37: 53-72. (Pubitemid 26191458)
25. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states [review]. Med Care 1997; 35: 1095-108. (Pubitemid 127453463)
26. Ferreira PL, Ferreira LN, Pereira LN. How consistent are health utility values[published online ahead of print August 8, 2008]? Qual Life Res 2008; 17: 1031-42.
27. McDonough CM, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, et al. A longitudinal comparison of 5 preference-weighted health state classification systems in persons with intervertebral disk herniation [published online ahead of print November 22, 2010]. Med Decis Making 2011; 31: 270-80.