How consistent are health utility values? (Quality of Life Research (2008) 17, (1031-1042) DOI: 10.1007/s11136-008-9368-8);How consistent are health utility values?

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1031-1042

  Ferreira, Pedro L ^a,b   Ferreira, Lara N ^b,c   Pereira, Luis N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALGARVE   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Agreement between instruments; Comparison; EQ 5D; Preference based measures of health related quality of life; SF 6D

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATING SCALE; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 50249149466     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-008-9393-7     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. R. Brooks 1996 EuroQol: The current state of play Health Policy (Amsterdam) 37 53 72 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6
2. P. Dolan 1997 Modelling valuations for EuroQol health states Medical Care 35 1095 1108 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002
3. Kind, P., Hardman, G., & Macran, S. (1999). UK Population Norms for EQ-5D. Discussion Paper 172. University of York: Centre for Health Economics.
4. G. Torrance W. Furlong D. Feeny M. Boyle 1995 Multi-attribute preference functions: Health utilities index PharmacoEconomics 7 503 520 10.2165/00019053-199507060-00005
5. G. Torrance D. Feeny W. Furlong R. Barr Y. Zhang Q. Wang 1996 Multi-attribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system: Health utilities index mark 2 Medical Care 34 7 702 722 10.1097/00005650-199607000-00004
6. C. McCabe K. Stevens J. Roberts J. Brazier 2005 Health state values for the HUI2 descriptive system: Results from a UK survey Health Economics 14 231 244 10.1002/hec.925
7. J. Brazier T. Usherwood R. Harper K. Thomas 1998 Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 health survey Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51 11 1115 1128 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00103-6
8. J. Brazier J. Roberts M. Deverill 2002 The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 Journal of Health Economics 21 271 292 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8
9. R. M. Kaplan J. W. Bush C. C. Berry 1976 Health status: Types of validity and the index of well-being Health Services Research 11 4 478 507
10. R. M. Kaplan T. G. Ganiats W. J. Sieber J. P. Anderson 1998 The quality of well-being scale: Critical similarities and differences with SF-36 International Journal for Quality in Health Care 10 509 520 10.1093/intqhc/10.6. 509
11. J. P. Anderson R. M. Kaplan C. C. Berry J. W. Bush R. G. Rumbaut 1989 Interday reliability of function assessment for a health status measure: The quality of well-being scale Medical Care 27 1076 1083 10.1097/00005650- 198911000-00008
12. R. Osborne G. Hawthorne E. Lew L. Gray 2003 Quality of life assessment in the community-dwelling elderly: Validation of the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) instrument and comparison with the SF-36 Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56 2 138 147 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00601-7
13. G. Hawthorne R. Osborne 2005 Population norms and meaningful differences for the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) measure Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 29 2 136 142 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2005.tb00063.x
14. J. Brazier J. Roberts A. Tsuchiya J. Busschbach 2004 A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups Health Economics 13 873 884 10.1002/hec.866
15. S. Petrou C. Hockley 2005 An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population Health Economics 14 11 1169 1189 10.1002/hec.1006
16. K. Stavem S. S. Frøland K. B. Hellum 2005 Comparison of preference-based utilities of the 15D, EQ-5D and SF-6D in patients with HIV/AIDS Quality of Life Research 14 971 980 10.1007/s11136-004-3211-7
17. L. Lamers C. Bouwmans A. van Straten M. Donker L. Hakkaart 2006 Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in mental health patients Health Economics 15 11 1229 1236 10.1002/hec.1125
18. C. Marra J. Woolcott J. Kopec K. Shojania R. Offer J. Brazier 2005 A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and The HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis Social Science & Medicine 60 1571 1582 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004. 08.034
19. D. Feeny L. Wu K. Eng 2004 Comparing short form 6D, standard gamble and health utilities index mark 2 and mark 3 utility scores: Results of total hip arthroplasty patients Quality of Life Research 13 10 1659 1670 10.1007/s11136-004-6189-2
20. A. Tsuchiya J. Brazier J. Roberts 2006 Comparison of valuation methods used to generate the EQ-5D and the SF-6D value sets Journal of Health Economics 25 2 334 346 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.09.003
21. C. Marra J. Esdaile D. Guh J. Kopec J. Brazier B. Koehler 2004 Chalmers, A., Anis, A. A comparison of four indirect methods of assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis Medical Care 42 11 1125 1131 10.1097/00005650-200411000- 00012
22. A. Pickard J. Simon A. Jeffrey D. H. Feeny 2005 Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life in stroke Quality of Life Research 14 207 219 10.1007/s11136-004-3928-3
23. L. Longworth S. Bryan 2003 An empirical comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D in liver transplant patients Health Economics 12 12 1061 1067 10.1002/hec.787
24. G. Hawthorne J. Richardson N. Atherton Day 2001 A comparison of the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments Annals of Medicine 33 358 370 10.3109/07853890109002090
25. J. Kopec K. Willison 2003 A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56 4 317 325 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00609-1
26. Everitt, B. S., & Dunn, G. (2001). Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. London: Arnold.
27. S. Bryan L. Longworth 2005 Measuring health-related utility: Why the disparity between EQ-5D and SF-6D? The European Journal of Health Economics 50 253 260 10.1007/s10198-005-0299-9
28. R. Holland R. Smith I. Harvey L. Swift E. Lenaghan 2004 Assessing quality of life in the elderly: A direct comparison of the EQ-5D and AQoL Health Economics 13 8 793 805 10.1002/hec.858
29. B. O'Brien M. Spath G. Blackhouse J. Severens P. Dorian J. Brazier 2003 A view from the bridge: Agreement between the SF-6d utility algorithm and the health utilities index Health Economics 12 11 975 981 10.1002/hec.789
30. K. Gerard T. Nicholson M. Mulle R. Mehta P. Roderick 2004 EQ-5D versus SF-6D in an older, chronically Ill patient group Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3 2 91 102 10.2165/00148365-200403020-00005
31. P. Franks E. Lubetkin M. Gold D. Tancredi H. Jia 2004 Mapping the SF-12 to the EuroQol EQ-5D index in a national US sample Medical Decision Making 24 3 247 254 10.1177/0272989X04265477
32. A. Gray O. Rivero-Arias P. Clarke 2006 Estimating the association between SF-12 responses and EQ-5D utility values by response mapping Medical Decision Making 26 18 18 29 10.1177/0272989X05284108
33. Tsuchiya, A., Brazier, J., McColl, E., & Parkin, D. (2002). Deriving preference-based single indices from non-preference based condition-specific instruments: Converting AQLQ into EQ5D indices. Discussion Paper 02/1. The University of Sheffield: Sheffield Health Economics Group.