Distinct functions of chloroplast FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 in Z-ring structure and remodeling

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 199, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 623-637

  Terbush, Allan D ^a   Osteryoung, Katherine W ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FTSZ PROTEIN; FTSZ1 PROTEIN; FTSZ2 PROTEIN; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL STRUCTURE; CHLOROPLAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; FISSION YEAST; FLUORESCENCE RECOVERY AFTER PHOTOBLEACHING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INDUCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN METABOLISM; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; YEAST;

CHLOROPLASTS; GTP PHOSPHOHYDROLASES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEINS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCETACEAE;

EID: 84871977157     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201205114     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Adams, D.W., and J. Errington. 2009. Bacterial cell division: assembly, maintenance and disassembly of the Z ring. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7:642-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2198
2. Anderson, D.E., F.J. Gueiros-Filho, and H.P. Erickson. 2004. Assembly dynamics of FtsZ rings in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli and effects of FtsZ-regulating proteins. J. Bacteriol. 186:5775-5781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.17.5775-5781.2004
3. Aylett, C.H.S., J. Löwe, and L.A. Amos. 2011. New insights into the mechanisms of cytomotive actin and tubulin filaments. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 292:1-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386033-0.00001-3
4. Basi, G., E. Schmid, and K. Maundrell. 1993. TATA box mutations in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe nmt1 promoter affect transcription efficiency but not the transcription start point or thiamine repressibility. Gene. 123:131-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(93)90552-E
5. Bi, E.F., and J. Lutkenhaus. 1991. FtsZ ring structure associated with division in Escherichia coli. Nature. 354:161-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/354161a0
6. Bolte, S., and F.P. Cordelières. 2006. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J. Microsc. 224:213-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01706.x
7. Buske, P.J., and P.A. Levin. 2012. Extreme C terminus of bacterial cytoskeletal protein FtsZ plays fundamental role in assembly independent of modulatory proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 287:10945-10957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.330324
8. Chen, Y., and H.P. Erickson. 2009. FtsZ filament dynamics at steady state: subunit exchange with and without nucleotide hydrolysis. Biochemistry. 48:6664-6673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi8022653
9. Chen, Y., K. Bjornson, S.D. Redick, and H.P. Erickson. 2005. A rapid fluorescence assay for FtsZ assembly indicates cooperative assembly with a dimer nucleus. Biophys. J. 88:505-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.044149
10. Chen, Y., D.E. Anderson, M. Rajagopalan, and H.P. Erickson. 2007. Assembly dynamics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis FtsZ. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 27736-27743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M703788200
11. Clough, S.J., and A.F. Bent. 1998. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16:735-743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x
12. Colletti, K.S., E.A. Tattersall, K.A. Pyke, J.E. Froelich, K.D. Stokes, and K.W. Osteryoung. 2000. A homologue of the bacterial cell division site-determining factor MinD mediates placement of the chloroplast division apparatus. Curr. Biol. 10:507-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00466-8
13. Dajkovic, A., G. Lan, S.X. Sun, D. Wirtz, and J. Lutkenhaus. 2008. MinC spatially controls bacterial cytokinesis by antagonizing the scaffolding function of FtsZ. Curr. Biol. 18:235-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.01.042
14. de Boer, P.A. 2010. Advances in understanding E. coli cell fission. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 13:730-737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2010.09.015
15. El-Kafafi, S., S. Mukherjee, M. El-Shami, J.-L. Putaux, M.A. Block, I. Pignot-Paintrand, S. Lerbs-Mache, and D. Falconet. 2005. The plastid division proteins, FtsZ1 and FtsZ2, differ in their biochemical properties and sub-plastidial localization. Biochem. J. 387:669-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20041281
16. Erickson, H.P., D.E. Anderson, and M. Osawa. 2010. FtsZ in bacterial cytokinesis: cytoskeleton and force generator all in one. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 74:504-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00021-10
17. Falconet, D. 2012. Origin, evolution and division of plastids. In Photosynthesis. Eaton-Rye, J.J., B.C. Tripathy, and T.D. Sharkey, editors. 35-61. Springer.
18. Forsburg, S.L. 1993. Comparison of Schizosaccharomyces pombe expression systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:2955-2956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/21.12.2955
19. Fu, G., T. Huang, J. Buss, C. Coltharp, Z. Hensel, and J. Xiao. 2010. In vivo structure of the E. coli FtsZ-ring revealed by photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM). PLoS ONE. 5:e12682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012682
20. Fujiwara, M., and S. Yoshida. 2001. Chloroplast targeting of chloroplast division FtsZ2 proteins in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 287:462-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.5588
21. Glynn, J.M., S.-Y. Miyagishima, D.W. Yoder, K.W. Osteryoung, and S. Vitha. 2007. Chloroplast division. Traffic. 8:451-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00545.x
22. Glynn, J.M., Y. Yang, S. Vitha, A.J. Schmitz, M. Hemmes, S.-Y. Miyagishima, and K.W. Osteryoung. 2009. PARC6, a novel chloroplast division factor, influences FtsZ assembly and is required for recruitment of PDV1 during chloroplast division in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 59:700-711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03905.x
23. Hu, Z., A. Mukherjee, S. Pichoff, and J. Lutkenhaus. 1999. The MinC component of the division site selection system in Escherichia coli interacts with FtsZ to prevent polymerization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:14819-14824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.26.14819
24. Huecas, S., C. Schaffner-Barbero, W. García, H. Yébenes, J.M. Palacios, J.F. Díaz, M. Menéndez, and J.M. Andreu. 2007. The interactions of cell division protein FtsZ with guanine nucleotides. J. Biol. Chem. 282:37515-37528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M706399200
25. Itoh, R., M. Fujiwara, N. Nagata, and S. Yoshida. 2001. A chloroplast protein homologous to the eubacterial topological specificity factor minE plays a role in chloroplast division. Plant Physiol. 127:1644-1655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.010386
26. Jennings, P.C., G.C. Cox, L.G. Monahan, and E.J. Harry. 2011. Super-resolution imaging of the bacterial cytokinetic protein FtsZ. Micron. 42:336-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2010.09.003
27. Kadirjan-Kalbach, D.K., D.W. Yoder, M.E. Ruckle, R.M. Larkin, and K.W. Osteryoung. 2012. FtsHi1/ARC1 is an essential gene in Arabidopsis that links chloroplast biogenesis and division. Plant J.
28. Li, Z., M.J. Trimble, Y.V. Brun, and G.J. Jensen. 2007. The structure of FtsZ filaments in vivo suggests a force-generating role in cell division. EMBO J. 26:4694-4708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601895
29. Lohse, S., B. Hause, G. Hause, and T. Fester. 2006. FtsZ characterization and immunolocalization in the two phases of plastid reorganization in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots of Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell Physiol. 47:1124-1134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcj083
30. Löwe, J. 1998. Crystal structure determination of FtsZ from Methanococcus jannaschii. J. Struct. Biol. 124:235-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsbi.1998.4041
31. Lu, C., J. Stricker, and H.P. Erickson. 1998. FtsZ from Escherichia coli, Azotobacter vinelandii, and Thermotoga maritima-quantitation, GTP hydrolysis, and assembly. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 40:71-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1998)40:1<71::AID-CM7>3.0.CO;2-I
32. Lutkenhaus, J. 2007. Assembly dynamics of the bacterial MinCDE system and spatial regulation of the Z ring. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76:539-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142652
33. Ma, X., and W. Margolin. 1999. Genetic and functional analyses of the conserved C-terminal core domain of Escherichia coli FtsZ. J. Bacteriol. 181:7531-7544.
34. Ma, X., D.W. Ehrhardt, and W. Margolin. 1996. Colocalization of cell division proteins FtsZ and FtsA to cytoskeletal structures in living Escherichia coli cells by using green fluorescent protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:12998-13003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.23.12998
35. Maple, J., and S.G. Møller. 2010. The complexity and evolution of the plastid-division machinery. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38:783-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0380783
36. Maple, J., N.-H. Chua, and S.G. Møller. 2002. The topological specificity factor AtMinE1 is essential for correct plastid division site placement in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 31:269-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01358.x
37. Maple, J., C. Aldridge, and S.G. Møller. 2005. Plastid division is mediated by combinatorial assembly of plastid division proteins. Plant J. 43:811-823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02493.x
38. Maple, J., L. Vojta, J. Soll, and S.G. Møller. 2007. ARC3 is a stromal Z-ring accessory protein essential for plastid division. EMBO Rep. 8:293-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400902
39. Margolin, W. 2005. FtsZ and the division of prokaryotic cells and organelles. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6:862-871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1745
40. Mateos-Gil, P., A. Paez, I. Hörger, G. Rivas, M. Vicente, P. Tarazona, and M. Vélez. 2012. Depolymerization dynamics of individual filaments of bacterial cytoskeletal protein FtsZ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:8133-8138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204844109
41. Maundrell, K. 1990. nmt1 of fission yeast. A highly transcribed gene completely repressed by thiamine. J. Biol. Chem. 265:10857-10864.
42. Mazouni, K., F. Domain, C. Cassier-Chauvat, and F. Chauvat. 2004. Molecular analysis of the key cytokinetic components of cyanobacteria: FtsZ, ZipN and MinCDE. Mol. Microbiol. 52:1145-1158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04042.x
43. McAndrew, R.S., J.E. Froehlich, S. Vitha, K.D. Stokes, and K.W. Osteryoung. 2001. Colocalization of plastid division proteins in the chloroplast stromal compartment establishes a new functional relationship between FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 127:1656-1666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.010542
44. McAndrew, R.S., B.J.S.C. Olson, D.K. Kadirjan-Kalbach, C.L. Chi-Ham, S. Vitha, J.E. Froehlich, and K.W. Osteryoung. 2008. In vivo quantitative relationship between plastid division proteins FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 and identification of ARC6 and ARC3 in a native FtsZ complex. Biochem. J. 412:367-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20071354
45. Milam, S.L., M. Osawa, and H.P. Erickson. 2012. Negative-stain electron microscopy of inside-out FtsZ rings reconstituted on artificial membrane tubules show ribbons of protofilaments. Biophys. J. 103:59-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2012.05.035
46. Mingorance, J., M. Tadros, M. Vicente, J.M. González, G. Rivas, and M. Vélez. 2005. Visualization of single Escherichia coli FtsZ filament dynamics with atomic force microscopy. J. Biol. Chem. 280:20909-20914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M503059200
47. Mingorance, J., G. Rivas, M. Vélez, P. Gómez-Puertas, and M. Vicente. 2010. Strong FtsZ is with the force: mechanisms to constrict bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 18:348-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2010.06.001
48. Miyagishima, S.-Y. 2005. Origin and evolution of the chloroplast division machinery. J. Plant Res. 118:295-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10265-005-0226-2
49. Miyagishima, S.-Y. 2011. Mechanism of plastid division: from a bacterium to an organelle. Plant Physiol. 155:1533-1544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.170688
50. Mori, T., H. Kuroiwa, M. Takahara, S.Y. Miyagishima, and T. Kuroiwa. 2001. Visualization of an FtsZ ring in chloroplasts of Lilium longiflorum leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 42:555-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pce095
51. Mukherjee, A., and J. Lutkenhaus. 1998. Dynamic assembly of FtsZ regulated by GTP hydrolysis. EMBO J. 17:462-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.2.462
52. Mukherjee, A., and J. Lutkenhaus. 1999. Analysis of FtsZ assembly by light scattering and determination of the role of divalent metal cations. J. Bacteriol. 181:823-832.
53. Oliva, M.A., S.C. Cordell, and J. Löwe. 2004. Structural insights into FtsZ protofilament formation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11:1243-1250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb855
54. Olson, B.J.S.C. 2008. Biochemical analysis of the chloroplast division proteins FtsZ1 and FtsZ2. In Biocehmistry and Molecular Biology. Vol. Ph.D. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. 259.
55. Olson, B.J.S.C., Q. Wang, and K.W. Osteryoung. 2010. GTP-dependent heteropolymer formation and bundling of chloroplast FtsZ1 and FtsZ2. J. Biol. Chem. 285:20634-20643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.122614
56. Osawa, M., and H.P. Erickson. 2011. Inside-out Z rings-constriction with and without GTP hydrolysis. Mol. Microbiol. 81:571-579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07716.x
57. Osawa, M., D.E. Anderson, and H.P. Erickson. 2008. Reconstitution of contractile FtsZ rings in liposomes. Science. 320:792-794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1154520
58. Osawa, M., D.E. Anderson, and H.P. Erickson. 2009. Curved FtsZ protofilaments generate bending forces on liposome membranes. EMBO J. 28:3476-3484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.277
59. Osteryoung, K.W., and R.S. McAndrew. 2001. The plastid division machine. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52:315-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.315
60. Osteryoung, K.W., and E. Vierling. 1995. Conserved cell and organelle division. Nature. 376:473-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/376473b0
61. Osteryoung, K.W., K.D. Stokes, S.M. Rutherford, A.L. Percival, and W.Y. Lee. 1998. Chloroplast division in higher plants requires members of two functionally divergent gene families with homology to bacterial ftsZ. Plant Cell. 10:1991-2004.
62. Popp, D., M. Iwasa, A. Narita, H.P. Erickson, and Y. Maéda. 2009. FtsZ condensates: an in vitro electron microscopy study. Biopolymers. 91:340-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bip.21136
63. Pyke, K.A. 2010. Plastid division. AoB Plants. 2010:plq016.
64. Pyke, K.A., and R.M. Leech. 1991. Rapid image analysis screening procedure for identifying chloroplast number mutants in mesophyll cells of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Plant Physiol. 96:1193-1195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.96.4.1193
65. Pyke, K.A., and R.M. Leech. 1992. Chloroplast division and expansion is radically altered by nuclear mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 99:1005-1008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.99.3.1005
66. Rabut, G., and J. Ellenberg. 2005. Photobleaching techniques to study mobility and molecular dynamics of proteins in live cells: FRAP, iFRAP, and FLIP. In Live Cell Imaging: A Laboratory Manual. R.D.a.S. Goldman, D.L., editor. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. 101-126.
67. Redick, S.D., J. Stricker, G. Briscoe, and H.P. Erickson. 2005. Mutants of FtsZ targeting the protofilament interface: effects on cell division and GTPase activity. J. Bacteriol. 187:2727-2736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.8.2727-2736.2005
68. Scheffers, D.J., J.G. de Wit, T. den Blaauwen, and A.J. Driessen. 2001. Substitution of a conserved aspartate allows cation-induced polymerization of FtsZ. FEBS Lett. 494:34-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02310-9
69. Schmitz, A.J., J.M. Glynn, B.J.S.C. Olson, K.D. Stokes, and K.W. Osteryoung. 2009. Arabidopsis FtsZ2-1 and FtsZ2-2 are functionally redundant, but FtsZ-based plastid division is not essential for chloroplast partitioning or plant growth and development. Mol Plant. 2:1211-1222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssp077
70. Shimada, H., M. Koizumi, K. Kuroki, M. Mochizuki, H. Fujimoto, H. Ohta, T. Masuda, and K.-i. Takamiya. 2004. ARC3, a chloroplast division factor, is a chimera of prokaryotic FtsZ and part of eukaryotic phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase. Plant Cell Physiol. 45:960-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pch130
71. Smith, A.G., C.B. Johnson, S. Vitha, and A. Holzenburg. 2010. Plant FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 expressed in a eukaryotic host: GTPase activity and self-assembly. FEBS Lett. 584:166-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.044
72. Smith, A.G., C.B. Johnson, S. Vitha, and A. Holzenburg. 2011. Oligomerization of plant FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 plastid division proteins. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 513:94-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2011.07.001
73. Srinivasan, R., M. Mishra, M. Murata-Hori, and M.K. Balasubramanian. 2007. Filament formation of the Escherichia coli actin-related protein, MreB, in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 17:266-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.11.069
74. Srinivasan, R., M. Mishra, L. Wu, Z. Yin, and M.K. Balasubramanian. 2008. The bacterial cell division protein FtsZ assembles into cytoplasmic rings in fission yeast. Genes Dev. 22:1741-1746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1660908
75. Stokes, K.D., R.S. McAndrew, R. Figueroa, S. Vitha, and K.W. Osteryoung. 2000. Chloroplast division and morphology are differentially affected by overexpression of FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 124:1668-1677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.124.4.1668
76. Strepp, R., S. Scholz, S. Kruse, V. Speth, and R. Reski. 1998. Plant nuclear gene knockout reveals a role in plastid division for the homolog of the bacterial cell division protein FtsZ, an ancestral tubulin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:4368-4373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.8.4368
77. Stricker, J., and H.P. Erickson. 2003. In vivo characterization of Escherichia coli ftsZ mutants: effects on Z-ring structure and function. J. Bacteriol. 185:4796-4805. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.16.4796-4805.2003
78. Suppanz, I., E. Sarnighausen, and R. Reski. 2007. An integrated physiological and genetic approach to the dynamics of FtsZ targeting and organisation in a moss, Physcomitrella patens. Protoplasma. 232:1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00709-007-0284-5
79. Vaughan, S., B. Wickstead, K. Gull, and S.G. Addinall. 2004. Molecular evolution of FtsZ protein sequences encoded within the genomes of archaea, bacteria, and eukaryota. J. Mol. Evol. 58:19-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00239-003-2523-5
80. Vitha, S., R.S. McAndrew, and K.W. Osteryoung. 2001. FtsZ ring formation at the chloroplast division site in plants. J. Cell Biol. 153:111-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.153.1.111
81. Vitha, S., J.E. Froehlich, O. Koksharova, K.A. Pyke, H. van Erp, and K.W. Osteryoung. 2003. ARC6 is a J-domain plastid division protein and an evolutionary descendant of the cyanobacterial cell division protein Ftn2. Plant Cell. 15:1918-1933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.013292
82. Wang, X., J. Huang, A. Mukherjee, C. Cao, and J. Lutkenhaus. 1997. Analysis of the interaction of FtsZ with itself, GTP, and FtsA. J. Bacteriol. 179:5551-5559.
83. Warrens, A.N., M.D. Jones, and R.I. Lechler. 1997. Splicing by overlap extension by PCR using asymmetric amplification: an improved technique for the generation of hybrid proteins of immunological interest. Gene. 186:29-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(96)00674-9
84. Yang, Y., J.M. Glynn, B.J.S.C. Olson, A.J. Schmitz, and K.W. Osteryoung. 2008. Plastid division: across time and space. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11:577-584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2008.10.001
85. Yoder, D.W., D. Kadirjan-Kalbach, B.J.S.C. Olson, S.-Y. Miyagishima, S.L. Deblasio, R.P. Hangarter, and K.W. Osteryoung. 2007. Effects of mutations in Arabidopsis FtsZ1 on plastid division, FtsZ ring formation and positioning, and FtsZ filament morphology in vivo. Plant Cell Physiol. 48:775-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcm049