Chloroplast division

Traffic

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 451-461

  Glynn, Jonathan M ^a   Miyagishima, Shin Ya ^b   Yoder, David W ^a   Osteryoung, Katherine W ^a   Vitha, Stanislav ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Japan Science and Technology Agency   (Japan)

^c Texas AandM University   (United States)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis; ARC6; Cyanobacteria; FtsZ; Min system; Organelle; PDV1; PDV2; Plastid division

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; DYNAMIN; ENVELOPE PROTEIN; FTSZ PROTEIN; GIANT CHLOROPLAST 1; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; MINC PROTEIN; MIND PROTEIN; MINE PROTEIN; PROTEIN ARC6; PROTEIN ATMIND; PROTEIN ATMINE; PROTEIN PDV1; PROTEIN PDV2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARABIDOPSIS; BACTERIAL CELL WALL; CELL DIVISION; CHLOROPLAST DIVISION; CYANOBACTERIUM; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENETIC TRANSFORMATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLASTID; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; REVIEW; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; CHLOROPLASTS; DYNAMINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT PROTEINS; PLASTIDS;

EID: 34247341418     PISSN: 13989219     EISSN: 16000854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00545.x     Document Type: Review

References (110)

1. Galili G. Regulation of lysine and threonine synthesis. Plant Cell 1995; 7: 899-906.
2. Lin C. Blue light receptors and signal transduction. Plant Cell 2002; 14: S207-S225.
3. Ohlrogge J, Browse J. Lipid biosynthesis. Plant Cell 1995; 7: 957-970.
4. Rujin C, Changhui G, Kanokporn B, Patrick HM. Complex physiological and molecular processes underlying root gravitropism. Plant Mol Biol 2002; 49: 305.
5. Weeden NF. Genetic and biochemical implications of the endosymbiotic origin of the chloroplast. J Mol Evol 1981; 17: 133-139.
6. Cavalier-Smith T. Membrane heredity and early chloroplast evolution. Trends Plant Sci 2000; 5: 174.
7. Dyall SD, Brown MT, Johnson PJ. Ancient invasions: From endosymbionts to organelles. Science 2004; 304: 253-257.
8. Wakasugi T, Nagai T, Kapoor M, Sugita M, Ito M, Ito S, Tsudzuki J, Nakashima K, Tsudzuki T, Suzuki Y, Hamada A, Ohta T, Inamura A, Yoshinaga K, Sugiura M. Complete nucleotide sequence of the chloroplast genome from the green alga Chlorella vulgaris: The existence of genes possibly involved in chloroplast division. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94: 5967-5972.
9. Lang-Unnasch N, Reith ME, Munholland J, Barta JR. Plastids are widespread and ancient in parasites of the phylum Apicomplexa. Int J Parasitol 1998; 28: 1743.
10. Cavalier-Smith T. Genomic reduction and evolution of novel genetic membranes and protein-targeting machinery in eukaryote-eukaryote chimaeras (meta-algae). Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2003; 358: 109.
11. Margolin W. FtsZ and the division of prokaryotic cells and organelles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6: 862-871.
12. Rothfield L, Taghbalout A, Shih YL. Spatial control of bacterial division-site placement. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005; 3: 959-968.
13. Osteryoung KW, Vierling E. Conserved cell and organelle division. Nature 1995; 376: 473.
14. Mukherjee A, Dai K, Lutkenhaus J. Escherichia coli cell division protein FtsZ is a guanine nucleotide binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90: 1053-1057.
15. Bi EF, Lutkenhaus J. FtsZ ring structure associated with division in Escherichia coli. Nature 1991; 354: 161-164.
16. Goehring NW, Beckwith J. Diverse paths to midcell: Assembly of the bacterial cell division machinery. Curr Biol 2005; 15: R514-R526.
17. Miyagishima S-y, Wolk CP, Osteryoung KW. Identification of cyanobacterial cell division genes by comparative and mutational analyses. Mol Microbiol 2005; 56: 126-143.
18. Stokes KD, Osteryoung KW. Early divergence of the FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 plastid division gene families in photosynthetic eukaryotes. Gene 2003; 320: 97.
19. Osteryoung KW, Nunnari J. The division of endosymbiotic organelles. Science 2003; 302: 1698-1704.
20. Osteryoung KW, Stokes KD, Rutherford SM, Percival AL, Lee WY. Chloroplast division in higher plants requires members of two functionally divergent gene families with homology to bacterial ftsZ. Plant Cell 1998; 10: 1991-2004.
21. Kiessling J, Martin A, Gremillon L, Rensing SA, Nick P, Sarnighausen E, Decker EL, Reski R. Dual targeting of plastid division protein FtsZ to chloroplasts and the cytoplasm. EMBO Rep 2004; 5: 889-894.
22. McAndrew RS, Froehlich JE, Vitha S, Stokes KD, Osteryoung KW. Colocalization of plastid division proteins in the chloroplast stromal compartment establishes a new functional relationship between FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 in higher plants. Plant Physiol 2001; 127: 1656-1666.
23. Vitha S, McAndrew RS, Osteryoung KW. FtsZ ring formation at the chloroplast division site in plants. J Cell Biol 2001; 153: 111-119.
24. El-Shami M, El-Kafafi S, Falconet D, Lerbs-Mache S. Cell cycle-dependent modulation of FtsZ expression in synchronized tobacco BY2 cells. Mol Genet Genomics 2002; 267: 254-261; [Epub 2002 March 20].
25. Pichoff S, Lutkenhaus J. Tethering the Z ring to the membrane through a conserved membrane targeting sequence in FtsA. Mol Microbiol 2005; 55: 1722-1734.
26. RayChaudhuri D. ZipA is a MAP-Tau homolog and is essential for structural integrity of the cytokinetic FtsZ ring during bacterial cell division. EMBO J 1999; 18: 2372-2383.
27. Hale CA, Rhee AC, de Boer PA. ZipA-induced bundling of FtsZ polymers mediated by an interaction between C-terminal domains. J Bacteriol 2000; 182: 5153-5166.
28. Maple J, Aldridge C, Moller SG. Plastid division is mediated by combinatorial assembly of plastid division proteins. Plant J 2005; 43: 811-823.
29. Vitha S, Froehlich JE, Koksharova O, Pyke KA, van Erp H, Osteryoung KW. ARC6 is a J-domain plastid division protein and an evolutionary descendant of the cyanobacterial cell division protein Ftn2. Plant Cell 2003; 15: 1918-1933.
30. El-Kafafi el S, Mukherjee S, El-Shami M, Putaux JL, Block MA, Pignot-Paintrand I, Lerbs-Mache S, Falconet D. The plastid division proteins, FtsZ1 and FtsZ2, differ in their biochemical properties and sub-plastidial localization. Biochem J 2005; 387: 669-676.
31. Lu C, Erickson HP. Purification and assembly of FtsZ. Methods Enzymol 1998; 298: 305-313.
32. Mukherjee A, Lutkenhaus J. Purification, assembly, and localization of FtsZ. Methods Enzymol 1998; 298: 296-305.
33. Stokes KD, McAndrew RS, Figueroa R, Vitha S, Osteryoung KW. Chloroplast division and morphology are differentially affected by overexpression of FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2000; 124: 1668-1677.
34. Chi-Ham C, McAndrew RS, Vitha S, Kadirjan-Kalbach D, Froehlich JE, Osteryoung KW. Molecular levels of plastid division proteins FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 and analysis of their interactions. 14th International Conference on Arabidopsis Research 2003. http://www.arabidopsis.org
35. Bi E, Lutkenhaus J. Cell division inhibitors SulA and MinCD prevent formation of the FtsZ ring. J Bacteriol 1993; 175: 1118-1125.
36. Huang J, Cao C, Lutkenhaus J. Interaction between FtsZ and inhibitors of cell division. J Bacteriol 1996; 178: 5080-5085.
37. Pichoff S, Lutkenhaus J. Escherichia coli division inhibitor MinCD blocks septation by preventing Z-ring formation. J Bacteriol 2001; 183: 6630-6635.
38. Hu Z, Lutkenhaus J. Topological regulation of cell division in Escherichia coli involves rapid pole to pole oscillation of the division inhibitor MinC under the control of MinD and MinE. Mol Microbiol 1999; 34: 82-90.
39. Raskin DM, de Boer PA. MinDE-dependent pole-to-pole oscillation of division inhibitor MinC in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 1999; 181: 6419-6424.
40. Suefuji K, Valluzzi R, RayChaudhuri D. Dynamic assembly of MinD into filament bundles modulated by ATP, phospholipids, and MinE. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 16776-16781; [Epub 2002 December 13].
41. Hu Z, Lutkenhaus J. A conserved sequence at the C-terminus of MinD is required for binding to the membrane and targeting MinC to the septum. Mol Microbiol 2003; 47: 345-355.
42. Szeto TH, Rowland SL, Rothfield LI, King GF. Membrane localization of MinD is mediated by a C-terminal motif that is conserved across eubacteria, archaea, and chloroplasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 15693-15698.
43. Hale CA, Meinhardt H, de Boer PA. Dynamic localization cycle of the cell division regulator MinE in Escherichia coli. EMBO J 2001; 20: 1563-1572.
44. Shih YL, Fu X, King GF, Le T, Rothfield L. Division site placement in E. coli: Mutations that prevent formation of the MinE ring lead to loss of the normal midcell arrest of growth of polar MinD membrane domains. EMBO J 2002; 21: 3347-3357.
45. Shih YL, Le T, Rothfield L. Division site selection in Escherichia coli involves dynamic redistribution of Min proteins within coiled structures that extend between the two cell poles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 7865-7870; [Epub 2003 May 23].
46. Fujiwara MT, Nakamura A, Itoh R, Shimada Y, Yoshida S, Moller SG. Chloroplast division site placement requires dimerization of the ARC11/ AtMinD1 protein in Arabidopsis. J Cell Sci 2004; 117: 2399-2410.
47. Itoh R, Fujiwara M, Nagata N, Yoshida S. A chloroplast protein homologous to the eubacterial topological specificity factor MinE plays a role in chloroplast division. Plant Physiol 2001; 127: 1644-1655.
48. Colletti KS, Tattersall EA, Pyke KA, Froelich JE, Stokes KD, Osteryoung KW. A homologue of the bacterial cell division site-determining factor MinD mediates placement of the chloroplast division apparatus. Current Biol 2000; 10: 507.
49. Maple J, Chua NH, Moller SG. The topological specificity factor AtMinE1 is essential for correct plastid division site placement in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2002; 31: 269-277.
50. Aldridge C, Moller SG. The plastid division protein AtMinD1 is a Ca2+-ATPase stimulated by AtMinE1. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 31673-31678.
51. Lackner LL, Raskin DM, de Boer PA. ATP-dependent interactions between Escherichia coli Min proteins and the phospholipid membrane in vitro. J Bacteriol 2003; 185: 735-749.
52. Douce R, Block MA, Dorne AJ, Joyard J. The plastid envelope membranes: their structure, composition, and role in chloroplast biogenesis. Subcell Biochem 1984; 10: 1-84.
53. Aldridge C, Maple J, Moller SG. The molecular biology of plastid division in higher plants. J Exp Bot 2005; 56: 1061-1077.
54. Hu Z, Mukherjee A, Pichoff S, Lutkenhaus J. The MinC component of the division site selection system in Escherichia coli interacts with FtsZ to prevent polymerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96: 14819-14824.
55. Shimada H, Koizumi M, Kuroki K, Mochizuki M, Fujimoto H, Ohta H, Masuda T, Takamiya K-i. ARC3, a chloroplast division factor, is a chimera of prokaryotic FtsZ and part of eukaryotic phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase. Plant Cell Physiol 2004; 45: 960-967.
56. Maple J, Moller SG. Plastid division: Evolution, mechanism and complexity. Ann Bot (Lond) 2006. doi:10.1093/aob/mcl249
57. Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H, Brunak S, von Heijne G. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J Mol Biol 2000; 300: 1005-1016.
58. Marston AL, Errington J. Selection of the midcell division site in Bacillus subtilis through MinD-dependent polar localization and activation of MinC. Mol Microbiol 1999; 33: 84-96.
59. Bernhardt TG, de Boer PA. SlmA, a nucleoid-associated, FtsZ binding protein required for blocking septal ring assembly over chromosomes in E. coli. Mol Cell 2005; 18: 555-564.
60. Wu LJ, Errington J. Coordination of cell division and chromosome segregation by a nucleoid occlusion protein in Bacillus subtilis. Cell 2004; 117: 915-925.
61. Koksharova OA, Wolk CP. A novel gene that bears a DnaJ motif influences cyanobacterial cell division. J Bacteriol 2002; 184: 5524-5528.
62. Ma X, Margolin W. Genetic and functional analyses of the conserved C-terminal core domain of Escherichia coli FtsZ. J Bacteriol 1999; 181: 7531-7544.
63. Mazouni K, Domain F, Cassier-Chauvat C, Chauvat F. Molecular analysis of the key cytokinetic components of cyanobacteria: FtsZ, ZipN and MinCDE. Mol Microbiol 2004; 52: 1145-1158.
64. Maple J, Fujiwara MT, Kitahata N, Lawson T, Baker NR, Yoshida S, Moller SG. GIANT CHLOROPLAST 1 Is essential for correct plastid division in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 2004; 14: 776-781.
65. Raynaud C, Cassier-Chauvat C, Perennes C, Bergounioux C. An Arabidopsis homolog of the bacterial cell division inhibitor SulA is involved in plastid division. Plant Cell 2004; 16: 1801-1811. [Epub 2004 June 18].
66. Cordell SC, Robinson EJ, Lowe J. Crystal structure of the SOS cell division inhibitor SulA and in complex with FtsZ. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 7889-7894; [Epub 2003 June 13].
67. Mizusawa S, Gottesman S. Protein degradation in Escherichia coli: The lon gene controls the stability of sulA protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1983; 80: 358-362.
68. Green P. Cinematic observations on the growth and division of chloroplasts in Nitella. Am J Bot 1964; 51: 334-342.
69. Schimper A. Uber die Entwicklung der Chlorophyll Korner und Farbkorner. Bot Zeit 1885; 41: 105-114.
70. Hashimoto H. Double ring structure around the constricting neck of dividing plastids of Avena sativa. Protoplasma 1986; 135: 166.
71. Mita T, Kanbe T, Tanaka K, Kuroiwa T. A ring structure around the dividing plane of the Cyanidium caldarium chloroplast. Protoplasma 1986; 130: 211.
72. Kuroiwa T, Kuroiwa H, Sakai A, Takahashi H, Toda K, Itoh R. The division apparatus of plastids and mitochondria. Int Rev Cytol 1998; 181: 1-41.
73. Miyagishima S, Takahara M, Kuroiwa T. Novel filaments 5 nm in diameter constitute the cytosolic ring of the plastid division apparatus. Plant Cell 2001; 13: 707-721.
74. Miyagishima S-Y, Kuroiwa H, Kuroiwa T. The timing and manner of disassembly of the apparatuses for chloroplast and mitochondrial division in the red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae. Planta 2001; 212: 517-528.
75. Miyagishima S-Y, Takahara M, Mori T, Kuroiwa H, Higashiyama T, Kuroiwa T. Plastid division is driven by a complex mechanism that involves differential transition of the bacterial and eukaryotic division rings. Plant Cell 2001; 13: 2257-2268.
76. Yoshida Y, Kuroiwa H, Misumi O, Nishida K, Yagisawa F, Fujiwara T, Nanamiya H, Kawamura F, Kuroiwa T. Isolated chloroplast division machinery can actively constrict after stretching. Science 2006; 313: 1435-1438.
77. Gao H, Kadirjan-Kalbach D, Froehlich JE, Osteryoung KW. ARC5, a cytosolic dynamin-like protein from plants, is part of the chloroplast division machinery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 4328-4333.
78. Miyagishima S-Y, Nishida K, Mori T, Matsuzaki M, Higashiyama T, Kuroiwa H, Kuroiwa T. A plant-specific dynamin-related protein forms a ring at the chloroplast division site. Plant Cell 2003; 15: 655-665.
79. Wiejak J, Wyroba E. Dynamin: Characteristics, mechanism of action and function. Cell Mol Biol Lett 2002; 7: 1073-1080.
80. Tieu Q, Nunnari J. Mdv1p is a WD repeat protein that interacts with the dynamin-related GTPase, Dnm1p, to trigger mitochondrial division. J Cell Biol 2000; 151: 353-366.
81. Sesaki H, Southard SM, Yaffe MP, Jensen RE. Mgm1p, a dynamin-related GTPase, is essential for fusion of the mitochondrial outer membrane. Mol Biol Cell 2003; 14: 2342-2356; [Epub 2003 February 6].
82. Hinshaw JE. Dynamin and its role in membrane fission. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2000; 16: 483-519.
83. Hinshaw JE, Schmid SL. Dynamin self-assembles into rings suggesting a mechanism for coated vesicle budding. Nature 1995; 374: 190-192.
84. Praefcke GJ, McMahon HT. The dynamin superfamily: Universal membrane tubulation and fission molecules? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004; 5: 133-147.
85. Roux A, Uyhazi K, Frost A, De Camilli P. GTP-dependent twisting of dynamin implicates constriction and tension in membrane fission. Nature 2006; 441: 528-531.
86. Miyagishima S-Y, Froehlich JE, Osteryoung KW. PDV1 and PDV2 mediate recruitment of the dynamin-related protein ARC5 to the plastid division site. Plant Cell 2006; 18:2517-30.
87. Pyke KA, Leech RM. Chloroplast division and expansion is radically altered by nuclear mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 1992; 99: 1005-1008.
88. Pyke KA, Leech RM. A genetic analysis of chloroplast division and expansion in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 1994; 104: 201-207.
89. Levina N, Totemeyer S, Stokes NR, Louis P, Jones MA, Booth IR. Protection of Escherichia coli cells against extreme turgor by activation of MscS and MscL mechanosensitive channels: Identification of genes required for MscS activity. EMBO J 1999; 18: 1730.
90. Haswell ES, Meyerowitz EM. MscS-like proteins control plastid size and shape in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 2006; 16: 1-11.
91. Pyke K. Plastid division: The squeezing gets tense. Curr Biol 2006; 16: R60.
92. DeBlasio SL, Luesse DL, Hangarter RP. A plant-specific protein essential for blue-light-induced chloroplast movements. Plant Physiol 2005; 139: 101-114; [Epub 2005 August 19].
93. Kasahara M, Kagawa T, Oikawa K, Suetsugu N, Miyao M, Wada M. Chloroplast avoidance movement reduces photodamage in plants. Nature 2002; 420: 829-832.
94. Sato Y, Wada M, Kadota A. Choice of tracks, microtubules and/or actin filaments for chloroplast photo-movement is differentially controlled by phytochrome and a blue light receptor. J Cell Sci 2001; 114: 269-279.
95. Takagi S. Actin-based photo-orientation movement of chloroplasts in plant cells. J Exp Biol 2003; 206: 1963-1969.
96. Austin J II, Webber AN. Photosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with reduced chloroplast number. Photosynth Res 2005; 85: 373-384.
97. Gao H, Sage TL, Osteryoung KW. FZL, an FZO-like protein in plants, is a determinant of thylakoid and chloroplast morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 6759-6764.
98. Kroll D, Meierhoff K, Bechtold N, Kinoshita M, Westphal S, Vothknecht UC, Soll J, Westhoff P. VIPP1, a nuclear gene of Arabidopsis thaliana essential for thylakoid membrane formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98: 4238-4242.
99. Wang Q, Sullivan RW, Kight A, Henry RL, Huang J, Jones AM, Korth KL. Deletion of the chloroplast-localized thylakoid formation1 gene product in Arabidopsis leads to deficient thylakoid formation and variegated leaves. Plant Physiol 2004; 136: 3594-3604.
100. Leong T-Y, Anderson JM. Changes in composition and function of thylakoid membranes as a result of photosynthetic adaptation of chloroplasts from pea plants grown under different light conditions. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1983; 723: 391-399.
101. Melis A. Light regulation of photosynthetic membrane structure, organization, and function. J Cell Biochem 1984; 24: 271-285.
102. Fujita M. Cdt1 revisited: Complex and tight regulation during the cell cycle and consequences of deregulation in mammalian cells. Cell Div 2006; 1: 22.
103. Masuda HP, Ramos GB, de Almeida-Engler J, Cabral LM, Coqueiro VM, Macrini CM, Ferreira PC, Hemerly AS. Genome based identification and analysis of the pre-replicative complex of Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett 2004; 574: 192-202.
104. Raynaud C, Perennes C, Reuzeau C, Catrice O, Brown S, Bergounioux C. Cell and plastid division are coordinated through the prereplication factor AtCDT1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102: 8216-8221.
105. Forth D, Pyke KA. The suffulta mutation in tomato reveals a novel method of plastid replication during fruit ripening. J Exp Bot 2006; 57: 1971-1979.
106. Kwok EY, Hanson MR. Stromules and the dynamic nature of plastid morphology. J Microsc 2004; 214: 124-137.
107. Katayama N, Takano H, Sugiyama M, Takio S, Sakai A, Tanaka K, Kuroiwa H, Ono K. Effects of antibiotics that inhibit the bacterial peptidoglycan synthesis pathway on Moss chloroplast division. Plant Cell Physiol 2003; 44: 776-781.
108. Kasten B, Reski R. Beta-lactam antibiotics inhibit chloroplast division in a moss (Physcomitrella patens) but not in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). J Plant Physiol 1997; 150: 137-140.
109. Machida M, Takechi K, Sato H, Chung SJ, Kuroiwa H, Takio S, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Fujita T, Hasebe M, Takano H. Genes for the peptidoglycan synthesis pathway are essential for chloroplast division in moss. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 6753-6758.
110. Aitken A, Stanier RY. Characterization of peptidoglycan from cyanelles of Cyanophora paradoxa. J Gen Microbiol 1979; 112: 219-223.