Orthology relations, symbolic ultrametrics, and cographs

Journal of Mathematical Biology

Volumn 66, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 399-420

  Hellmuth, Marc ^a   Hernandez Rosales, Maribel ^b,c   Huber, Katharina T ^d   Moulton, Vincent ^d   Stadler, Peter F ^b,c,e,f   Wieseke, Nicolas ^c  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICS IN THE SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^f SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cograph; Cotree; Orthology; Rooted triples; Symbolic ultrametric

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871957160     PISSN: 03036812     EISSN: 14321416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00285-012-0525-x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aho AV, Sagiv Y, Szymanski TG, Ullman JD (1981) Inferring a tree from lowest common ancestors with an application to the optimization of relational expressions. SIAM J Comput 10: 405-421.
2. Altenhoff AM, Dessimoz C (2009) Phylogenetic and functional assessment of orthologs inference projects and methods. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000262.
3. Berglund AC, Sjölund E, Ostlund G, Sonnhammer EL (2008) InParanoid 6: eukaryotic ortholog clusters with inparalogs. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D263-D266.
4. Böcker S, Dress AWM (1998) Recovering symbolically dated, rooted trees from symbolic ultrametrics. Adv Math 138: 105-125.
5. Brandstädt A, Le VB, Spinrad JP (1999) Graph classes: a survey. SIAM monographs on discrete mathematics and applications. Soc Ind Appl Math, Philadelphia.
6. Byrka J, Guillemot S, Jansson J (2010) New results on optimizing rooted triplets consistency. Discrete Appl Math 158: 1136-1147.
7. Corneil DG, Lerchs H, Stewart Burlingham LK (1981) Complement reducible graphs. Discrete Appl Math 3: 163-174.
8. Datta RS, Meacham C, Samad B, Neyer C, Sjölander K (2009) Berkeley PHOG: phylofacts orthology group prediction web server. Nucleic Acids Res 37: W84-W89.
9. Falls C, Powell B, Snœyink J (2008) Computing high-stringency COGs using Turán-type graphs. Technical report. http://www. cs. unc. edu/~snoeyink/comp145/cogs. pdf.
10. Goodstadt L, Ponting CP (2006) Phylogenetic reconstruction of orthology, paralogy, and conserved synteny for dog and human. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e133.
11. Hubbard TJ, Aken BL, Beal K, Ballester B, Caccamo M, Chen Y, Clarke L, Coates G, Cunningham F, Cutts T, Down T, Dyer SC, Fitzgerald S, Fernandez-Banet J, Graf S, Haider S, Hammond M, Herrero J, Holland R, Howe K, Howe K, Johnson N, Kahari A, Keefe D, Kokocinski F, Kulesha E, Lawson D, Longden I, Melsopp C, Megy K, Meidl P, Ouverdin B, Parker A, Prlic A, Rice S, Rios D, Schuster M, Sealy I, Severin J, Slater G, Smedley D, Spudich G, Trevanion S, Vilella A, Vogel J, White S, Wood M, Cox T, Curwen V, Durbin R, Fernandez-Suarez XM, Flicek P, Kasprzyk A, Proctor G, Searle S, Smith J, Ureta-Vidal A, Birney E (2007) Ensembl 2007. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D610-D617.
12. Huson D, Rupp R, Scornavacca C (2010) Phylogenetic networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Kristensen DM, Wolf YI, Mushegian AR, Koonin EV (2011) Computational methods for gene orthology inference. Brief Bioinf 12: 379-391.
14. Lechner M, Findeiß S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF, Prohaska SJ (2011) Proteinortho: detection of (co-) orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 124.
15. Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS (2003) Orthomcl: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 13: 2178-2189.
16. Li H, Coghlan A, Ruan J, Coin LJ, Hériché JK, Osmotherly L, Li R, Liu T, Zhang Z, Bolund L, Wong GK, Zheng W, Dehal P, Wang J, Durbin R (2006) TreeFam: a curated database of phylogenetic trees of animal gene families. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D572-D580.
17. Liu Y, Wang J, Guo J, Chen J (2011) Cographs editing: complexity and parametrized algorithms. In: Fu B, Du DZ (eds) COCOON 2011. Lecture notes computer science, vol 6842. Springer, Berlin, pp 110-121.
18. Maddison WP (1997) Gene trees in species trees. Syst Biol 46: 523-536.
19. Page RDM, Charleston MA (1998) Trees within trees: phylogeny and historical associations. Trends Ecol Evol 13: 356-359.
20. Protti F, Dantas da Silva M, Szwarcfiter JL (2009) Applying modular decomposition to parameterized cluster editing problems. Theory Comput Syst 44: 91-104.
21. Pryszcz LP, Huerta-Cepas J, Gabaldón T (2011) MetaPhOrs: orthology and paralogy predictions from multiple phylogenetic evidence using a consistency-based confidence score. Nucleic Acids Res 39: e32.
22. Rauch Henzinger M, King V, Warnow T (1999) Constructing a tree from homeomorphic subtrees, with applications to computational evolutionary biology. Algorithmica 24: 1-13.
23. Semple C, Steel M (2000) A supertree method for rooted trees. Discrete Appl Math 105: 147-158.
24. Semple C, Steel M (2003) Phylogenetics. Oxford lecture series in mathematics and its applications, vol 24. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
25. Sneath P, Sokal R (1973) Numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, pp 230-234.
26. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV (2000) The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 33-36.
27. Wheeler DL, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bryant SH, Canese K, Chetvernin V, Church DM, Dicuccio M, Edgar R, Federhen S, Feolo M, Geer LY, Helmberg W, Kapustin Y, Khovayko O, Landsman D, Lipman DJ, Madden TL, Maglott DR, Miller V, Ostell J, Pruitt KD, Schuler GD, Shumway M, Sequeira E, Sherry ST, Sirotkin K, Souvorov A, Starchenko G, Tatusov RL, Tatusova TA, Wagner L, Yaschenko E (2008) Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D13-D21.
28. Zhang J (2003) Evolution by gene duplication: an update. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 292-298.