Designing for perceptual crossing: Applying and evaluating design notions

International Journal of Design

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 41-55

  Deckers, Eva ^a   Lévy, Pierre ^a   Wensveen, Stephan ^b   Ahn, René ^a   Overbeeke, Kees ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Design notions; Designing behaviour; Perceptive qualities; Perceptual crossing; Research through design

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871947626     PISSN: 19913761     EISSN: 1994036X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Language and perception in a more than human world. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
2. Brugger, P. (2001). From haunted brain to haunted science: A cognitive neuroscience view of paranormal and pseudoscientific thought. In J. Houran, R. Lange, & J. Beloff (Eds.), Hauntings and poltergeists: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 195-213). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
3. Dalsgaard, P., & Hansen, L. K. (2008). Performing perception-staging aesthetics of interaction. Transactions on Computer Human Interaction, 15(3), 1-33.
4. Deckers, E. J. L., Wensveen, S. A. G., Ahn, R. M. C., & Overbeeke, C. J. (2011). Designing for perceptual crossing to improve user involvement. In D. S. Tan, S. Amershi, B. Begole, W. A. Kellogg, & M. Tungare (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1929-1938). New York, NY: ACM Press.
5. Deckers, E. J. L., Wensveen, S. A. G., & Overbeeke, C. J. (2010). PeR: Designing for perceptive qualities. In Proceedings of the 6th DeSForM Conference (pp. 68-70). Lucerne, Switzerland: Lucerne School of Art and Design.
6. Deckers, E., Westerhoff, J., Pikaart, M., van Wanrooij, G., & Overbeeke, C. (2009). How perception gets emotional value through the use of an object. In K. Overbeeke, I. Koskinen, & J. Forlizzi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (pp.104-115). Compiègne, France: Université de Technologie de Compiègne.
7. Deckers, E. J. L., & Levy, P. D. (2012). Designing for perceptive qualities: 7 showcases. In Proceedings of the 9th Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 496-505). New York, NY: ACM Press.
8. DiSalvo, C. F., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., & Kiesler, S. (2002). All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In B. Verplank, A. Sutcliffe, W. Mackay, J. Amowitz, & W. Gaver (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 321-326). New York, NY: ACM Press.
9. Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundation of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Fällman, D. (2003). In romance with the materials of mobile interaction, a phenomenological approach to the design of mobile information technology (Doctoral Dissertation). Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University.
11. Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., & Evenson, S. (2008).Crafting the place for interaction design research in HCI. Design Issues, 24(3), 19-29.
12. Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1-5.
13. Frens, J. W. (2006). Designing for rich interaction: Integrating form, interaction, and function (Doctoral Dissertation). Eindhoven, the Netherland: Eindhoven University of Technology.
14. Frens, J. W., & Overbeeke, C. J. (2009). Setting the state for the design of highly interactive systems. In K. P. Lee (Ed), Proceedings of 3rd International Association of Societies of Design Research (pp. 1-10). Seoul, South Korea: Korean Society of Design Science.
15. Froese, T., & Ezequiel, A. D. P. (2010). Modeling social interaction as perceptual crossing: An investigation into the dynamics of the interaction process. Connection Science, 22(1), 43-68.
16. Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2008). The phenomenological mind: An introduction philosophy of mind and cognitive science. New York, NY: Routledge.
17. Gibson, J. J. (1986). An ecological approach to visual perception. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Original work published 1979)
18. Hallnäs, L., & Redström, J. (2002). From use to presence: On the expressions and aesthetics of everyday computational things. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 9(2), 106-124.
19. Hornecker, E., & Buur, J. (2006). Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction. In G. M. Olson, & R. Jeffries (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 437-446). New York, NY: ACM Press.
20. Itti, L., & Baldi, P. (2009). Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. Vision Research, 49(10), 1295-1306.
21. Keller, K. D., (2001). Intentionality in perspectival structure. Chiasmi Interantional: Trilingual Studies Concerning Merleau-Ponty's Thoughts. Årg. 3, s. 375-397
22. Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Reström, J., & Wensveen, S., (2011). Design research through practice: From the lab, feld and showroom. Waltham, MA:Morgan Kaufmann.
23. Lenay, C. (2010). "It's so touching": Emotional value in distal contact. International Journal of Design, 4(2), 14-26.
24. Lenay, C., Thouvenin, I., Guénand, A., Gapenne, O., Stewart, J., & Maillet, B. (2007). Designing the ground for pleasurable experience. In I. Koskinen, & T. Keinonen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (pp. 35-58). New York, NY: ACM Press.
25. Locher, P., Vos, A., Stappers, P. J., & Overbeeke, K. (2000). A system for investigating 3-D form perception. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 17-27.
26. Marti, P. (2010). Perceiving while being perceived. International Journal of Design, 4(2), 27-38.
27. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1958). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans). London, UK: Routledge, & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945).
28. Michaels, C. F., & Carello, C.(1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
29. Moen J. (2005). Towards people based movement interaction and kinaesthetic interaction experiences. In O. W. Bertelsen, N. O. Bouvin, P. G. Krogh, & M. Kyng (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility (pp. 121-124). New York, NY: ACM Press.
30. Robertson, T. (2002). The public availability of actions and artifacts. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11(3), 299-316.
31. Rugg, G., & McGeorge, P. (1995). Laddering. Expert Systems, 12(4), 246-339
32. Schiphorst, T. (2009). Soft(n): Toward a somaesthetics of touch. In Jr. Dan R. Olsen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2427-2438). New York: ACM Press
33. Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press
34. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametic statistics for the behavioral sciences (p. 249). New York, NY: Mc-Graw Hill
35. Svanæs, D. (1999). Understanding interactivity, steps to a phenomenology of human-computer interaction (Doctoral Dissertation). Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
36. Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwoord, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
37. Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). An analysis and critique of research through design: Towards a formalization of a research approach. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 310-319). New York, NY: ACM Press.