An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 293-300

  Pittayapat, P ^a   Galiti, D ^a   Huang, Y ^a   Dreesen, K ^a   Schreurs, M ^a   Souza, P Couto ^b   Rubira Bullen, I R F ^c   Westphalen, F H ^b   Pauwels, R ^a   Kalema, G ^d   Willems, G ^a   Jacobs, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^d KU LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Computer assisted image interpretation; Cone beam computed tomography; Diagnostic imaging; Image quality; Panoramic radiography

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871933289     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0698-0     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Numata H (1933) Consideration of the parabolic radiography of the dental arch. J Shimazu Stud 10: 13.
2. Paatero Y (1949) A new tomographic method for radiographing curved outer surfaces. Acta Radiol 32: 177.
3. Paatero Y (1948) The use of a mobile source of light in radiography. Acta Radiol 29: 221.
4. Tronje G, Eliasson S, Julin P, Welander U (1981) Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. II. Vertical distances. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 22: 449-455.
5. Tronje G, Welander U, McDavid WD, Morris CR (1981) Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. III. Inclined objects. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 22: 585-592.
6. Tronje G, Welander U, McDavid WD, Morris CR (1981) Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. I. General considerations. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 22: 295-299.
7. Wyatt DL, Farman AG, Orbell GM, Silveira AM, Scarfe WC (1995) Accuracy of dimensional and angular measurements from panoramic and lateral oblique radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 24: 225-231.
8. Chenin DL (2010) 3D cephalometrics: the new norm. Alpha Omegan 103: 51-56.
9. Swennen GR, Schutyser F (2006) Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130: 410-416. doi: 10. 1016/j. ajodo. 2005. 11. 035.
10. Pawelzik J, Cohnen M, Willers R, Becker J (2002) A comparison of conventional panoramic radiographs with volumetric computed tomography images in the preoperative assessment of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60: 979-984. doi: 10. 1053/joms. 2002. 34399.
11. Mischkowski RA, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Dreiseidler T, Keeve E, Zoller JE (2007) Diagnostic quality of panoramic views obtained by a newly developed digital volume tomography device for maxillofacial imaging. Quintessence Int 38: 763-772.
12. Angelopoulos C, Thomas SL, Hechler S, Parissis N, Hlavacek M (2008) Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66: 2130-2135. doi: 10. 1016/j. joms. 2008. 06. 021.
13. Agresti A (2007) An introduction to categorical data analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New Jersey.
14. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159-174.
15. Gijbels F, De Meyer AM, Bou Serhal C, van den Bossche C, Declerck J, Persoons M, Jacobs R (2000) The subjective image quality of direct digital and conventional panoramic radiography. Clin Oral Investig 4: 162-167. doi: 10. 1007/s007840000040162. 784.
16. Ludlow JB, Laster WS, See M, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG (2007) Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103: 534-542. doi: 10. 1016/j. tripleo. 2006. 04. 008.
17. van Elslande D, Heo G, Flores-Mir C, Carey J, Major PW Accuracy of mesiodistal root angulation projected by cone-beam computed tomographic panoramic-like images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137: S94-99. doi: 10. 1016/j. ajodo. 2009. 02. 028.
18. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, Cockmartin L, Bosmans H, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Horner K (2012) Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 81: 267-271. doi: 10. 1016/j. ejrad. 2010. 11. 028.