Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening coverage and follow-up of high grade abnormal results in a population-based cohort

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 128, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 95-100

  Elit, L ^a,b   Saskin, R ^c   Raut, R ^b   Elliott, L ^b   Murphy, J ^b,d   Marrett, L ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Cancer Care Ontario   (Canada)

^c INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EVALUATIVE SCIENCES   (Canada)

^d PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer screening; Indicators; Population based

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SCREENING; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLPOSCOPY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCOME; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; COLPOSCOPY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 84871926456     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: 10956859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. J. Murphy, E. Kennedy, S. Dunn, M. Fung Kee Fung, D. Gzik, and C.M. McLachlin Cervical screening http://www.cancercare.on.ca/toolbox/ qualityguidelines/clin-program/screening-ebs/ [Accessed 17Apr2012]
2. K.R. Yabroff, K.S. Washington, A. Leader, E. Neilson, and J. Mandelblatt Is the promise of cancer-screening programs being compromised? Quality of follow-up care after abnormal screening results Med Care Res Rev 60 3 2003 294 331
3. R. Kupets, and L. Paszat How are women with high grade Pap smear abnormalities managed? A population based study Gynecol Oncol 121 2011 499 504
4. Cancer Care Ontario. Ontario Cervical Screening Program: Program Report 1997-2000. Toronto, Canada; 2005.
5. R. Wilkins PCCF+ Version 3G Users Guide: automated geographic coding based on the statistics Canada postal code conversions files 2001 Statistics Canada Ottawa
6. B.T.B. Chan, and S.E. Schultz Supply and utilization of general practitioner and family physician services in Ontario ICES investigative report 2005 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto
7. Cervical Screening: a practice guideline http://www.cancercare.on.ca/pdf/ pebc-cervical-screen.pdf [Accessed 2009Feb9]
8. Ontario Women's Health Council in partnership with CCO and Cancer Quality Council of Ontario The quality of cancer services for women in Ontario 2006 [Toronto, Canada]. https://www.cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/UserFile.aspx? fileId=13712 [accessed 22Oct2012].
9. Cancer System Quality Index (CSQI 2006) http://www.cancercare.on.ca/ common/pages/UserFile.aspx?fileId=13228 [Accessed 7Feb2010]
10. Cancer Care Ontario Cervical cancer screening (with Pap tests). CSQI 2008 https://www.cancercare.on.ca/cms/One.aspx?portalId=14473&pageId=14861 [accessed 1May2012]
11. R. Glazier North American Primary Care Research Group Mapping the future of primary healthcare research in Canada Ann Fam Med 6 1 Jan-Feb 2008 89 90
12. CPAC Cervical cancer screening Canada Monitoring Program Performance 2006-2008 2001
13. Cancer Care Ontario Ontario Cervical Screening Program Report, 2003-2008.Toronto: October 2011 [cited 2012, March 2]. Available from: http://www.cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/UserFile.aspx?fileId=117127
14. M. Fung-Kee-Fung, R. Howlett, T. Oliver, J. Murphy, L. Elit, J. Strychowsky, and R.J. Pisick The optimum organization for the delivery of colposcopy service in Ontario PEBM 14Feb2008 http://www.cancercare.on.ca/ toolbox/qualityguidelines/clin-programs/screening-ebs [accessed 17Apr2012]
15. D. Luesley Colposcopy and Programme Management. Guidelines for the NHS Cervical Screening Programme 2nd ed. May 2010 NHSCSP Publication Sheffield England No 20 [ http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/publications/ nhhscsp20.pdf, (accessed 1May2012 pg 16-17)]
16. National Health and Medical Research Council Screening to prevent cervical cancer: guidelines for the management of asymptomatic women with screen detected abnormalities [Approved 9Jun2005] http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/- files>nhmrc/publications/attachments/wh39.pdf?q=publications/synopses/-files/ wh39.pdf [accessed 1May2012, pg 52]
17. L. Elit, M. Krzyzanowski, R. Saskin, L. Barbera, A. Razzaq, and A. Yertsinia Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening and followup of abnormal results in a population-based cohort Can Fam Physician 58 1 Jan 2012 e22 e31
18. K.M. Gorey, E.J. Holowaty, E. Laukkanen, G. Fehringer, and N.L. Richter Association between socioeconomic status and cancer incidence in Toronto, Ontario: possible confounding of cancer mortality by incidence and survival Cancer Prev Control 2 5 1998 236 241
19. A.K. Lofters, R. Moineddin, S.W. Hwang, and R.H. Glazier Low rates of cervical cancer screening among urban immigrants. A population-based study in Ontario, Canada Med Care 48 7 2010 611 618
20. F. Tabnak, J.L. Wang, W. Zhang, and L.P. Howell Timeliness and follow-up patterns of cervical cancer detection in a cohort of medically underserved California women Cancer Causes Control 21 2010 411 420
21. L.P. Engelstad, S. Stewart, R. Otero-Sabogal, M.S. Leung, and P.I. Davis The effectiveness of a community outreach intervention to improve follow-up among underserved women at highest risk for cervical cancer Prev Med 41 3-4 2005 741 748
22. A. Tomlinson, M. Kyrgiou, E. Paraskevaidis, H. Kitchener, and P. Martin-Hirsch Does improving communication and information for women increase attendance at colposcopy in an inner city clinic? A randomised controlled trial Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 25 4 2004 445 448
23. G.S. Ogilvie, E.A. Shaw, S.P. Lusk, J. Zazulak, and J.A. Kaczorowski Access to colposcopy services for high-risk Canadian women: Can we do better? Can J Public Health 95 5 2004 346 351
24. K.R. Yabroff, J. Zapka, C.N. Klabunde, G. Yuan, D.W. Buckman, and D. Haggstrom Systems strategies to support cancer screening in US primary care practice Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20 12 2011 2471 2479
25. K. Kawamoto, C.A. Houlihan, A. Balas, and D.F. Lobach Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success BMJ 2005 10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F [published 14Mar2005]
26. J.G. Zapka, E. Puleo, S. Taplin, L.I. Solberg, J. Mouchawar, and C. Somkin Breast and cervical cancer screening: clinicans' views on health plan guidelines and implementation efoorts J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 35 2005 46 54
27. E.G. Stone, S.C. Morton, M.E. Hulscher, M.A. Maglione, E.A. Roth, and J.M. Grimshaw Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis Ann Intern Med 136 2002 641 651