Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results

Canadian Family Physician

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Elit, Laurie ^a,b   Krzyzanowska, Monika ^c,d   Saskin, Refik ^e   Barbera, Lisa ^e,f,g   Razzaq, Asma ^e   Lofters, Aisha ^c   Yeritsyan, Naira ^e   Bierman, Arlene ^f,h  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b JURAVINSKI CANCER CENTRE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^e INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EVALUATIVE SCIENCES   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^g SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^h ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABNORMAL LABORATORY RESULT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CANCER SCREENING; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLPOSCOPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCOME; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; RESIDENTIAL AREA; SOCIAL STATUS; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CANADA; COHORT STUDIES; COLPOSCOPY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856113686     PISSN: 0008350X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Canadian Cancer Society, National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian cancer statistics 2008. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2008. Available from: www.cancer.ca/~/media/CCS/Canada%20wide/Files%20List/ English%20files%20heading/pdf%20not%20in%20publications%20section/ Canadian%20Cancer%20Society%20Statistics%20PDF%20 2008-614137951.ashx. Accessed 2011 Nov 22.
2. Fehringer G, Howlett R, Cotterchio M, Klar N, Majpruz-Moat V, Mai V. Comparison of Papanicolaou (Pap) test rates across Ontario and factors associated with cervical screening. Can J Public Health 2005;96(2):140-4. (Pubitemid 40528716)
3. Spayne J, Ackerman I, Milosevic M, Seidenfeld A, Covens A, Paszat L. Invasive cervical cancer: a failure of screening. Eur J Public Health 2008;18(2):162-5. Epub 2007 May 4.
4. Glazier R; North American Primary Care Research Group. Mapping the future of primary healthcare research in Canada. Ann Fam Med 2008;6(1):89-90.
5. Yabroff KR, Washington KS, Leader A, Neilson E, Mandelblatt J. Is the promise of cancer-screening programs being compromised? Quality of follow-up care after abnormal screening results. Med Care Res Rev 2003;60(3):294-331. (Pubitemid 36993502)
6. Bastani R, Yabroff KR, Myers RE, Glenn B. Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening. Cancer 2004;101(5 Suppl):1188-200. (Pubitemid 39100413)
7. Cancer Care Ontario. Ontario Cervical Cancer Screening Program: program report, 1997-2000. Toronto, ON: Cancer Care Ontario; 2000.
8. Cancer Care Ontario. Cervical screening: a practice guideline. Toronto, ON: Cancer Care Ontario; 2006. Available from: www.cancercare.on.ca/pdf/pebc- cervical-screen.pdf. Accessed 2009 Feb 9.
9. Krzyzanowska MK, Barbera L, Elit L, Kwon J, Lofters A, Saskin R, et al. Cancer. In: Bierman AS, editor. Project for an Ontario Women's Health Evidence-Based Report. Volume 1. Toronto, ON: St Michael's Hospital and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2009.
10. Wilkins R. PCCF + version 3G user's guide: automated geographic coding based on the Statistics Canada postal code conversions files. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada; 2001.
11. Chan BTB, Schultz SE. Supply and utilization of general practitioner and family physician services in Ontario. ICES investigative report. Toronto, ON: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2005.
12. Ontario Women's Health Council, Cancer Care Ontario, Cancer Quality Council of Ontario. The quality of cancer services for women in Ontario. Toronto, ON: Ontario Women's Health Council; 2006. Available from: www.cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/UserFile.aspx?fileId=13712. Accessed 2011 Nov 22.
13. Cancer Quality Council of Ontario. Cancer system quality index - 2006. Toronto, ON: Cancer Quality Council of Ontario; 2006. Available from: www.cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/UserFile.aspx?fileId=13228. Accessed 2010 Feb 7.
14. Ontario Cervical Screening Program. Selected extracts from the OCSP program report 2001-2005. Toronto, ON: Cancer Care Ontario; 2007. Available from: www.cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/UserFile.aspx?fileId=13744. Accessed 2011 Nov 22.
15. Gorey KM, Holowaty EJ, Laukkanen E, Fehringer G, Richter NL. Association between socioeconomic status and cancer incidence in Toronto, Ontario: possible confounding of cancer mortality by incidence and survival. Cancer Prev Control 1998;2(5):236-41. (Pubitemid 29030236)
16. Tabnak F, Müller HG, Wang JL, Zhang W, Howell LP. Timeliness and follow-up patterns of cervical cancer detection in a cohort of medically underserved California women. Cancer Causes Control 2010;21(3):411-20. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
17. Engelstad LP, Stewart S, Otero-Sabogal R, Leung MS, Davis PI, Pasick RJ. The effectiveness of a community outreach intervention to improve follow-up among underserved women at highest risk for cervical cancer. Prev Med 2005;41(3-4):741-8. (Pubitemid 41400038)
18. Tomlinson A, Kyrgiou M, Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener H, Martin-Hirsch P. Does improving communication and information for women increase attendance at colposcopy in an inner city clinic? A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2004;25(4):445-8. (Pubitemid 38954520)
19. Ogilvie GS, Shaw EA, Lusk SP, Zazulak J, Kaczorowski JA. Access to colposcopy services for high-risk Canadian women: can we do better? Can J Public Health 2004;95(5):346-51. (Pubitemid 39328278)
20. Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS, Jayant K, Muwonge R, Budukh AM, et al. HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N Engl J Med 2009;360(14):1385-94.