Systems strategies to support cancer screening in U.S. primary care practice

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 20, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2471-2479

  Yabroff, K Robin ^a   Zapka, Jane ^b   Klabunde, Carrie N ^a   Yuan, Gigi ^c   Buckman, Dennis W ^c   Haggstrom, David ^d   Clauser, Steven B ^a   Miller, Jacqueline ^e   Taplin, Stephen H ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC   (United States)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL RECORD; NURSE PRACTITIONER; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PERFORMANCE; PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADULT; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIANS, PRIMARY CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 83055198325     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0783     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale. Am J Nurs 2003;103:101-9.
2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:129-31.
3. Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:132-41. (Pubitemid 34779159)
4. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54:41-52. (Pubitemid 38443419)
5. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:716-26.
6. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening recommendations for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:680-2.
7. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, Saslow D, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:99-119.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: breast cancer screening among women aged 50-74 years - United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010;59:813-6.
9. Klanbunde CN. Trends in the Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States. In: NIH State-of-the-Science Conference: Enhancing Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening, February 2-4, 2010, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 35-9. http://consensus.nih.gov/2010/colorectalabstracts. htm. Accessed October 17, 2011.
10. Klabunde CN, Schenck AP, Davis WW. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among Medicare consumers. Am J Prev Med 2006;30:313-9. (Pubitemid 43357920)
11. Glasgow RE, Orleans TC, Wagner EH, Curry SJ, Solberg LI. Does the Chronic Care Model serve also as a template for prevention? Milbank Q 2001;79:579-612. (Pubitemid 33636206)
12. Coleman K, Mattke S, Perrault PJ, Wagner EH. Untangling practice redesign from disease management: how do we best care for the chronically ill? Annu Rev Public Health 2009;30:385-408.
13. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1223-38. (Pubitemid 40327908)
14. Anhang Price R, Zapka J, Edwards H, Taplin SH. Organizational factors and the cancer screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;40:38-57.
15. Zapka J, Taplin SH, Anhang Price R, Cranos C, Yabroff R. Factors in quality care - the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests-problemsin the steps and interfaces of care. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;40:58-71.
16. Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, Maglione MA, Roth EA, Grimshaw JM, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:641-51. (Pubitemid 34462676)
17. Mandelblatt J, Yabroff KR. Effectiveness of interventions designed to increase mammography use: a meta-analysis of provider-targeted strategies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:759-67. (Pubitemid 29445012)
18. Yabroff KR, Mandelblatt JS. Interventions targeted to patients to increase mammography use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:749-57. (Pubitemid 29445011)
19. Baron RC, Rimer BK, Breslow RA, Coates RJ, Kerner J, Melillo S, et al. Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2008;35:S34-55. (Pubitemid 351787500)
20. Baron RC, Melillo S, Rimer BK, Coates RJ, Kerner J, Habarta N, et al. Intervention to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers: a systematic review of provider reminders. Am J Prev Med 2008;38:110-7.
21. Department of Veterans Affairs. Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture (VISTA). VistA-HealtheVet Monograph. July 2008; http://www.va.gov/vista-monograph/. Accessed October 17, 2011.
22. The HMO Cancer Research Network (CRN): Capacity, Collaboration, and Investigation; 2010. [cited 2011 Sep 12]. Available from: http://crn.cancer.gov/ .
23. Romano MJ, Stafford RS. Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:897-903.
24. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, Donelan K, Ferris TG, Jha A, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care: a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med 2008;359:50-60. (Pubitemid 351931096)
25. Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K. Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care? JAMA 2003;290:259-64. (Pubitemid 37430067)
26. National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' recommendations & practice for breast, cervical, colorectal, & lung cancer screening;2011. [cited 2011 Sep 4]. Available from: http://healthservices cancer gov/surveys/screening-rp/.
27. The American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 5th ed. Lenexa, KS: AAPOR; 2008.
28. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:347-60. (Pubitemid 34977137)
29. Friedberg MW, Coltin KL, Safran DG, Dresser M, Zaslavsky AM, Schneider EC. Associations between structural capabilities of primary care practices and performance on selected quality measures. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:456-63.
30. Klabunde CN, Lanier D, Breslau ES, Zapka JG, Fletcher RH, Ransohoff DF, et al. Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice: innovative strategies and future directions. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:1195-205. (Pubitemid 47038049)
31. Naylor MD, Kurtzman ET. The role of nurse practitioners in reinventing primary care. Health Aff 2010;29:893-9.
32. Pohl JM, Hanson C, Newland JA, Cronenwett L. Analysis & commentary. Unleashing nurse practitioners' potential to deliver primary care and lead teams. Health Aff 2010;29:900-5.
33. Sequist TD, Zaslavsky AM, Marshall R, Fletcher RH, Ayanian JZ. Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:364-71.
34. Klabunde CN, Frame PS, Meadow A, Jones E, Nadel M, Vernon SW. A national survey of primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Prev Med 2003;36:352-62. (Pubitemid 36299087)
35. Yabroff KR, Klabunde CN, Yuan G, McNeel TS, Brown ML, Casciotti D, et al. Are physicians' recommendations for colorectal cancer screening guideline-consistent? J Gen Intern Med 2011;26:177-84.
36. Graubard BI, Korn EL. Predictive margins with survey data. Biometrics 1999;55:652-9. (Pubitemid 29302598)
37. Research Triangle Institute. SUDAAN language manual: release 9.0. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 2004.
38. Glasgow RE, Marcus AC, Bull SS, Wilson KM. Disseminating effective cancer screening interventions. Cancer 2004;101:1239-50. (Pubitemid 39100417)
39. Green LW, Glasgow RE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof 2006;29:126-53. (Pubitemid 43797500)
40. Weiner BJ, Amick H, Lee SY. Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change: a review of the literature in health services research and other fields. Med Care Res Rev 2008;65:379-436. (Pubitemid 351990020)
41. Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care 1998;7:149-58.
42. Malin JL, Kahn K, Dulai G, Farmer MM, Rideout J, Simon LP, et al. Organizational systems used by California capitated medical groups and independent practice associations to increase cancer screening. Cancer 2000;88:2824-31. (Pubitemid 30417945)
43. Oliveria SA, Altman JF, Christos PJ, Halpern AC. Use of nonphysician health care providers for skin cancer screening in the primary care setting. Prev Med 2002;34:374-9. (Pubitemid 34969597)
44. Hudson SV, Ohman-Strickland P, Cunningham R, Ferrante JM, Hahn K, Crabtree BF. The effects of teamwork and system support on colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices. Cancer Detect Prev 2007;31:417-23. (Pubitemid 350166788)
45. Chaudhry B, Want J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:742-52. (Pubitemid 46780634)
46. Taplin SH, Rollason D, Camp A, diDonato K, Maggenheimer E. Imagining an electronic medical record for turning cancer screening knowledge into practice. Am J Prev Med 2010;38:89-97.
47. Dentzer S. One year after the stimulus, will we get health IT right? Health Aff 2010;29:582.
48. Linder JA, Ma J, Bates DW, Middleton B, Stafford RS. Electronic health record use and the quality ofambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1400-5. (Pubitemid 47052439)
49. Rao SR, Desroches CM, Donelan K, Campbell EG, Miralles PD, Jha AK. Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:271-5.
50. Halamka JD. Making the most of federal health information technology regulations. Health Aff 2010;29:596-600.
51. Bates DW, Bitton A. The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Aff 2010;29:614-21.
52. Ralston JD, Coleman K, Reid RJ, Handley MR, Larson EB. Patient experience should be part of meaningful-use criteria. Health Aff 2010;29:607-13.
53. Hesse BW, Hanna C, Massett HA, Hesse NK. Outside the box: will information technology be a viable intervention to improve the quality of cancer care? J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;40:81-9.
54. Holden DJ, Jonas DE, Porterfield DS, Reuland D, Harris R. Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:668-76.
55. Nemeth LS, Nietert PJ, Ornstein SM. High performance in screening for colorectal cancer: a Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet) case study. J Am Board Fam Pract 2009;22:141-6.
56. Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Smith KC, for the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda (MD): NIH [cited 2011 Aug]. Available from: http://obssr.od.nih.gov/mixed-methods-research.
57. De Moor G, O'Brien J, Fridsma D, Bean C, Devlies J, Cusack CM, et al. Policy brief on the current status of certification of electronic health records in the US and Europe. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;170:83-106.