Conducting a multicentre and multinational qualitative study on patient transitions

BMJ Quality and Safety

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2012, Pages

  Johnson, Julie K ^a   Barach, Paul ^b,c   Vernooij Dassen, Myrra ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e Kalorama Foundation   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL HANDOVER; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; METHODOLOGY; PLANNING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; EUROPE; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MANAGEMENT; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); PERSONNEL; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PILOT STUDY; PROCEDURES; PUBLIC RELATIONS; STANDARDS; STATISTICS;

COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; EUROPE; HUMANS; INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT TEAMS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; PATIENT HANDOFF; PERSONNEL SELECTION; PILOT PROJECTS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84871925994     PISSN: 20445415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001197     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. The European HANDOVER Research Collaborative. HANDOVER.
2. Barach P, Gademan P, Kalkman C, et al. Identify basic elements of effective communication. Utrecht, Netherlands: The European HANDOVER Research Collaborative, 2010.
3. Johnson J, Barach P. Quality improvement methods to study and improve the process and outcomes of pediatric cardiac surgery. Prog Pediatric Cardiol 2011;32:147-53.
4. Lilford RJ, Chilton PJ, Hemming K, et al. Evaluating policy and service interventions: framework to guide selection and interpretation of study end points. BMJ 2010;341:c4413.
5. Division of Cancer Prevention. Clinical Trials Management: National Cancer Institute, 2012.
6. Aisen M, Schafer K. Basic principles of setting up multicenter trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1997;11:185-88. (Pubitemid 27449466)
7. Irving SY, Curley MA. Challenges to conducting multicenter clinical research: ten points to consider. AACN Adv Crit Care 2008;19:164-9.
8. Appel LJ. A primer on the design, conduct, and interpretation of clinical trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol CJASN 2006;1:1360-7.
9. Kearney N, Miller M, Sermeus W, et al. Multicentre research and the WISECARE experience. Workflow Information Systems for European Nursing Care. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:999-1007.
10. Dean S, Harpera C, Cappuccioa F, et al. The challenges of cross-national research in primary health care across Europe. Fam Pract 2005;22:341-46.
11. Nail LM, Barsevick AM, Meek PM, et al. Planning and conducting a multi-institutional project on fatigue. Oncol Nurs Forum 1998;25:1398-403.
12. Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder W. Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press. Boston, MA. 2002.
13. Wenger EC, Snyder WM. Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harvard Bus Rev 2000;78:139-+.
14. Kislov R, Harvey G, Walshe K. Collaborations for leadership in applied health research and care: lessons from the theory of communities of practice. Implement Sci: IS 2011;6:64.
15. Serious games to teach quality and safety competencies. IHI/BMJ International Forum on Quality and Safety in Healthcare; 2012; 20 April 2012; Paris, France.
16. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, et al. Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10(Suppl 1):21-34. (Pubitemid 40993882)
17. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 2000;320:50-2. (Pubitemid 30173021)
18. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349-57. (Pubitemid 350186969)
19. Reynolds J, Kizito J, Ezumah N, et al. Quality assurance of qualitative research: a review of the discourse. Health Res Policy Syst/BioMed Central 2011;9:43.
20. Grol R, Wensing M, Hulscher M, et al. Theories on implementation of change in healthcare. In: Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. eds. Improving patient care: The implementation of change in clinical practice. London: Elsevier 2005:273-84.
21. Corbin J, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 1990;10:3-21.
22. Brassard M, Ritter D. The memory jogger. Methuen, MA: GOAL/QPC, 1994.
23. Williams M. Generalization in interpretive research. In: May T.ed. Qualitative research in action. London: Sage, 2002:125-43.
24. Finfgeld-Connett D. Generalizability and transferability of meta-synthesis research findings. J Adv Nurs 2010;66:246-54.
25. Johnson JK, Woods DM, Stevens DP, et al. Joy and challenges in improving chronic illness care: capturing daily experiences of academic primary care teams. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25(Suppl 4):S581-5.