An analysis of the readability of patient information and consent forms used in research studies in anaesthesia in Australia and New Zealand

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 995-998

  Taylor, H E ^a   Bramley, D E P ^a  

^a WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Consent; Readability; Research

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT INFORMATION; READING; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMPREHENSION; METHODOLOGY; NEW ZEALAND; PATIENT EDUCATION; RESEARCH SUBJECT; STANDARD;

ANESTHESIA; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COMPREHENSION; CONSENT FORMS; HUMANS; NEW ZEALAND; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 84871915836     PISSN: 0310057X     EISSN: 14480271     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0310057x1204000610     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for research involving human subjects. From www.wma.net. Accessed October 2011.
2. European Medicines Agency. Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice: Note for Guidance for Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH/135/95) London: EMEA, 2006. p. 48.
3. Hanlon SF, Shapiro RS. Ethical issues in biomedical research: Diaz v. Hillsborough County Hospital Authority. Hum Rights 2003; 30:16-18.
4. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S. Do they understand? (part I): parental consent for children participating in clinical anesthesia and surgery research. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:603-608.
5. National Health and Research Council (NHMRC). National Statement on ethical conduct in human ethics. Australian Research Council, and Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia 2007.
6. National Health and Medical Research Council. Human Research and Ethics Portal. From hrep.nhmrc.gov.au. Accessed April 2012.
7. Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey, Summary Results. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics 2008; p. 87 Report No: 4228.0.
8. OECD, Statistics Canada. Literacy for Life: Further Results from the Adult Literacy and Life. Ottawa: OECD Publishing 2011.
9. The Adult Literacy and Life Skills (ALL) Survey: Overview and International Comparisons. Wellington: Ministry of Education 2008. p. 35.
10. Health Literacy, Australia. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics 2008; p. 80 Report No: 4223.0.
11. Selzer, J. What constitutes a 'readable' technical style? In: Anderson PV, Brockmann RJ, Miller CR, ed. New essays in scientific and technical communication: research, theory and practice. New York: Baywood, 1983.
12. McLaughlin GH. SMOG grading - a new readability formula. J Reading 1969; 639-646.
13. Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 1948; 32:221-233.
14. Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count, and Flesch Readability Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Memphis: Naval Air Station 1975. Research Branch Report 8-75.
15. Utilities for online operating systems. Readability Calculator. From www.online-utility.org/english/readability-test-and-improve.jsp. Accessed February 2012.
16. Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:721-726.
17. Menoni V, Lucas N, Leforestier JF, Dimet J, Doz F, Chatellier G et al. The readability of information and consent forms in clinical research in France. PLoS One 2010; 5:e10576.
18. Menoni V, Lucas N, Leforestier J-F, Doz F, Chatellier G, Jacqz-Aigain E et al. Readability of the written study information in pediatric research in France. PLoS One 2011; 6:e18484.
19. Fitzsimmons PR, Michael BD, Hulley JL, Scott GO. A readability assessment of online Parkinson's Disease information. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2010; 40:292-296.
20. Buccini LD, Iverson D, Caputi P, Jones C. An Australian based study on the readability of HIV/AIDS and Type 2 Diabetes clinical trial informed consent documents. J Bioeth Inq 2010; 7:313-319.
21. Wegner MV, Girasek DC. How readable are child safety seat installation instructions? Pediatrics 2003; 111:588-591.
22. Terblanche M, Burgess L. Examining the readability of patient-informed consent forms. Open Access J Clin Trials 2010; 2:157-162.
23. Estrada CA, Hryniewicz MM, Higgs VB, Collins C, Byrd JC. Anticoagulant patient information material is written at high readability levels. Stroke 2000; 31:2966-2970.
24. DuBay, WH. Smart language: readers, readability and the grading of test. Costa Mesa: Impact Information 2007.
25. Marnell G. Measuring readability. Part 1: the spirit is willing but the Flesch is weak. Part 2: validation and its pitfalls. 2009. From www.abelard.com.au/readability%20statistics.pdf. Accessed October 2011.
26. Taylor W. Cloze procedure: a new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quart 1953; 30:415-433.
27. Meade CD, Smith CF. Readability formulas: cautions and criteria. Patient Educ Couns 1991; 17:153-158.
28. L ey P, Florio T. The use of readability formulas in healthcare. Psychol Health Med 1996; 1:7-28.
29. Ridpath JR, Greene SM, Wiese CJ. PRISM Readability Toolkit: 3rd ed. Seattle: Group Health Research Institute 2007.