The current role of percutaneous biopsy of renal masses

Canadian Journal of Urology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 6243-6249

  Mally, Abhijith Dev ^a   Gayed, Bishoy ^a   Averch, Timothy ^a   Davies, Benjamin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Active surveillance; Fineneedle aspiration; Renal mass biopsy; Renal tumors

Indexed keywords

FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY; HUMAN; KIDNEY TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; REVIEW;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84871896595     PISSN: 11959479     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62(1):10-29.
2. Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98(18):1331-1334.
3. Chow WH, Devesa SS, Warren JL, Fraumeni JF. Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA 1999;281(17): 1628-1631.
4. Bosniak MA. The small (less than or equal to 3.0 cm) renal parenchymal tumor: detection, diagnosis, and controversies. Radiology 1991;179(2):307-317.
5. Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 2003;170(6):2217-2221.
6. Wehle MJ, Thiel DD, Petrou SP, Young PR, Frank I, Karsteadt N. Conservative management of incidental contrast-enhancing renal masses as safe alternative to invasive therapy. Urology 2004; 64(1):49-52.
7. Rosales JC, Haramis G, Moreno J et al. Active surveillance for renal cortical neoplasms. J Urol 2010;183(5):1698-1702.
8. Crispen PL, Wong YN, Greenberg RE, Chen DY, Uzzo RG. Predicting growth of solid renal masses under active surveillance. Urol Oncol 2008;26(5):555-559.
9. Kunkle DA, Crispen PL, Chen DY, Greenberg RE, Uzzo RG. Enhancing renal masses with zero net growth during active surveillance. J Urol 2007;177(3):849-853.
10. Kouba E, Smith A, McRackan D, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS. Watchful waiting for solid renal masses: insight into the natural history and results of delayed intervention. J Urol 2007;177(2):466-470.
11. Crispen PL, Viterbo R, Fox EB, Greenberg RE, Chen DY, Uzzo RG. Delayed intervention of sporadic renal masses undergoing active surveillance. Cancer 2008;112(5):1051-1057.
12. Beisland C, Hjelle KM, Reisaeter LA, Bostad L. Observation should be considered as an alternative in management of renal masses in older and comorbid patients. Eur Urol 2009;55(6):1419-1427.
13. Youssif A, Kassouf W, Steinberg J, Aprikian AG, Laplante MP, Tanguay S. Active surveillance for selected patients with renal masses: updated results with long-term follow-up. Cancer 2007; 110(5):1010-1014.
14. Abouassaly R, Lane BR, Novick AC. Active surveillance of renal masses in elderly patients. J Urol 2008;180(2):505-508.
15. Crispen PL, Viterbo R, Boorjian SA, Greenberg RE, Chen DY, Uzzo RG. Natural history, growth kinetics, and outcomes of untreated clinically localized renal tumors under active surveillance. Cancer 2009;115(13):2844-2852.
16. Link RE, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME et al. Exploring the learning curve, pathological outcomes and perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed for renal mass. J Urol 2005;173(5):1690-1694.
17. Gill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM et al. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol 2003;170(1):64-68.
18. Novick AC, Campbell SC, Belldegrun A et al. Guidelines for the management of clinical stage 1 renal mass. Available at http://www.auanet.org/content/media/renalmass09.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2011.
19. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1982;6(7):655-663.
20. Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Hanlon AL, Greenberg RE, Chen DY, Uzzo RG. The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J Urol 2006; 175(2):425-431.
21. Eshed I, Elias S, Sidi AA. Diagnositc value of CT-guided biopsy of indeterminate renal masses. Clin Radiol 2004;59(3) 262-267.
22. Rybicki FJ, Shu KM, Cibas ES, Fielding JR, vanSonnenberg E, Silverman SG. Percutaneous biopsy of renal masses: sensitivity and negative predictive value stratified by clinical setting and size of masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(5):1281-1287.
23. Lane BR, Samplaski MK, Herts BR, Zhou M, Novick AC, Campbell SC. Renal mass biopsy - A renaissance? J Urol 2008;179(1): 20-27.
24. Neuzillet Y, Lechevallier E, Andre M, Daniel L, Coulange C. Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses. J Urol 2004;171(5):1802-1805.
25. Volpe A, Mattar K, Finelli A et al. Contemporary results of percutaneous biopsy of 100 small renal masses: a single center experience. J Urol 2008;180(6):2333-2337.
26. Shannon B, Cohen RJ, de Bruto H, Davies RJ. The value of preoperative needle core biopsy for diagnosing benign lesions among small, incidentally detected renal masses. J Urol 2008; 180(4):1257-1261.
27. Wang R, Wolf JS Jr, Wood DP Jr, Higgins EJ, Hafez KS. Accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy in management of small renal masses. Urology 2009;73(3):586-590.
28. Lebret T, Poulain JE, Molinie V et al. Percutaneous core biopsy for renal masses: indications, accuracy and results. J Urol 2007;178(4): 1184-1188.
29. Veltri A, Garetto I, Tosetti I. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of imaging-guided needle biopsy of renal masses. Retrospective analysis on 150 cases. Eur Radiol 2010;21(2):393-401.
30. Maturen KE, Nghiem HV, Caoili EM, Higgins EG, Wolf JS Jr, Wood DP Jr. Renal mass core biopsy: accuracy and impact on clinical management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(2):563-570.
31. Ralls PW, Barakos JA, Kaptein EM et al. Renal biopsy-related hemorrhage: frequency and comparison of CT and sonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11(6):1031-1034.
32. Lechevallier E, Andre M, Barriol D et al. Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical CT guidance. Radiology 2000;216(2):506-510.
33. Richter F, Kasabian NG, Irwin RJ, Watson RA, Lang EK. Accuracy of diagnosis by guided biopsy of renal mass lesions classified indeterminate by imaging studies. Urology 2000 55(3): 348-352.
34. Hara I, Miyake H, Hara S, Arakawa S, Hanioka K, Kamidono S. Role of percutaneous image-guided biopsy in the evaluation of renal masses. Urol Int 2001;67(3):199-202.
35. Caoili EM, Bude RO, Higgins EJ, HoffDL, Nghiem HV. Evaluation of sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179(2):373-378.
36. Dechet CB, Zincke H, Sebo TJ et al. Prospective analysis of computerized tomography and needle biopsy with permanent sectioning to determine the nature of solid renal masses in adults. J Urol 2003;169(1):71-74.
37. Shah RB, Bakshi N, Hafez KS, Wood DP Jr, Kunju LP. Imageguided biopsy in the evaluation of renal mass lesions in contemporary urological practice: indications, adequacy, clinical impact, and limitations of the pathological diagnosis. Hum Pathol 2005;36(12):1309-1315.
38. Juul N, Torp-Pedersen S, Gronvall S, Holm HH, Koch F, Larsen S. Ultrasonically guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of renal masses. J Urol 1985;133(4):579-581.
39. Cristallini EG, Paganelli C, Bolis GB. Role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the assessment of renal masses. Diagn Cytopathol 1991; 7(1):32-35.
40. Niceforo J, Coughlin BF. Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma: value of fine-needle aspiration cytology in patients with metastases or contraindications to nephrectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161(6): 1303-1305.
41. Murphy WM, Zambroni BR, Emerson LD, Moinuddin S, Lee LH. Aspiration biopsy of the kidney. Simultaneous collection of cytologic and histologic specimens. Cancer 1985;56(1):200-205.
42. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Herts B et al. Prospective evaluation of fine needle aspiration of small, solid renal masses: accuracy and morbidity. Urology 1997;50(1):25-29.
43. Truong LD, Todd TD, Dhurandhar B, Ramzy I. Fine-needle aspiration of renal masses in adults: analysis of results and diagnostic problems in108 cases. Diagn Cytopathol l999;20(6):339-349.
44. Al Nazer M, Mourad WA. Successful grading of renal-cell carcinoma in fine-needle aspirates. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;22(4): 223-226.
45. Cajulis RS, Katz RL, Dekmezian R, el-Naggar A, Ro JY. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of renal cell carcinoma. Cytologic parameters and their concordance with histology and flow cytometric data. Acta Cytol 1993;37(3):367-372.
46. Volpe A, Kachura JR, Geddie WR et al. Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy. J Urol 2007;178(2):379-386.
47. Barocas DA, Mathew S, Delpizzo JJ et al. Renal cell carcinoma subtyping by histopathology and fluorescence in situ hybridization on a needle biopsy specimen. BJU Int 2007;99(2):290-295.
48. Barocas DA, Rohan SM, Kao J et al. Diagnosis of renal tumors on needle biopsy specimens by histological and molecular analysis. J Urol 2006;176(5):1957-1962.
49. Lam JS, Leppert JT, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS. Role of molecular markers in the diagnosis and therapy of renal cell carcinoma. Urology 2005;66(5):1-9.
50. Kümmerlin I, Ten KF, Smedts F et al. Core biopsies of renal tumors: a study on diagnostic accuracy, interobserver, and intraobserver variability. Eur Urol 2008;53(6):1219-1225.
51. Wood BJ, Khan MA, McGovern F, Harisinghani M, Hahn PF, Mueller PR. Imaging guided biopsy of renal masses: indications, accuracy and impact on clinical management. J Urol 1999;161(5):1470-1474.
52. Silverman SG, Gan YU, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Cibas ES. Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology 2006;240(1):6-22.
53. Gibbons RP, Bush WH, Burnett LL. Needle tract seeding following aspiration of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1977;118(5):865-867.
54. Kiser GC, Totonchy M, Barry JM. Needle tract seeding after percutaneous renal adenocarcinoma aspiration. J Urol 1986;136(6): 1292-1293.
55. Shenoy PD, Lakhkar BN, Ghosh MK, Patil UD. Cutaneous seeding of renal carcinoma by Chiba needle aspiration biopsy. Case report. Acta Radiol 1991;32(1):50-52.
56. Wehle MJ, Grabstald H. Contraindications to needle aspiration of solid renal mass: tumor dissemination by renal needle aspiration. J Urol 1986;136(2):446-448.
57. Auvert J, Abbou CC, Lavarenne V. Needle tract seeding following puncture of renal oncocytoma. Prog Clin Biol Res 1982;100:597-598.
58. Abe M, Saitoh M. Selective renal tumour biopsy under ultrasonic guidance. Br J Urol 1992;70(1):7-11.
59. Brierly RD, Thomas PJ, Harrison NW, Fletcher MS, Nawrocki JD, Ashton-Key M. Evaluation of fine-needle aspiration cytology for renal masses. BJU Int 2000;85(1):14-18.
60. Silverman SG, Gan YU, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Cibas ES. Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology 2006;24 (1):6-22.
61. Schmidbauer J, Remzi M, Memarsadeghi M et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses. Eur Urol 2008;53(5):1003-1011.
62. Lane BR, Abouassaly R, Gao T et al. Active treatment of localized renal tumors may not impact overall survival in patients aged 75 years or older. Cancer 2010;116(13):3119-3126.
63. Parsons JK, Schoenber MS, Carter HB. Incidental renal tumors: casting doubt on the efficacy of early intervention. Urology 2001; 57(6):1013-1015.
64. Pandharipande PV, Gervais DA, Hartman RI et al. Renal mass biopsy to guide treatment decisions for small incidental renal tumors: a cost effectiveness analysis. Radiology 2010;256(3):429-438.
65. Kunkle DA, Egleston BL, Uzzo RG. Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma - A meta-analysis and review. J Urol 2008;179(4):1227-1234
66. Jewett MA, Finelli A, Link I et al. Active surveillance of small renal masses: a prospective multi-center Canadian uro-oncology group trail. J Urol 2009;181(4):320.