Developmental onset of reproductive barriers and associated proteome changes in stigma/styles of Solanum pennellii

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 265-279

  Chalivendra, Subbaiah C ^a,d   Lopez Casado, Gloria ^b,f   Kumar, Aruna ^c,e   Kassenbrock, Alina R ^a   Royer, Suzanne ^a   Tovar Mèndez, Alejandro ^c   Covey, Paul A ^a   Dempsey, Laura A ^a   Randle, April M ^a   Stack, Stephen M ^a   Rose, Jocelyn K C ^b   McClure, Bruce ^c   Bedinger, Patricia A ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c University of Missouri   (United States)

^d Valent BioSciences Corporation   (United States)

^e AMITY UNIVERSITY   (India)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

pistil development; reproductive barriers; self incompatibility; Solanum pennellii; stigma stylar proteins; unilateral incongruity incompatibility

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME; RIBONUCLEASE; RIBONUCLEASE S; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FLOWER; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN TUBE; POLLINATION; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCTION; SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY (PLANT); SOLANUM; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FLOWERS; PLANT PROTEINS; POLLEN TUBE; POLLINATION; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCTION; RIBONUCLEASES; SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY IN FLOWERING PLANTS; SOLANUM; TIME FACTORS;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PENNELLII;

EID: 84871810671     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ers324     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Amien S, Kliwer I, Márton ML, Debener T, Geiger D, Becker D, Dresselhaus T. 2010. Defensin-like ZmES4 mediates pollen tube burst in maize via opening of the potassium channel KZM1. PLOS Biology 8, e1000388.
2. Bedinger PA, Chetelat RT, McClure BA, Moyle LC, Rose JKC, Stack SM, van der Knaap E, Baek YS, Lopez-Casado G, Covey PA, Kumar A, Li W, Nunez R, Cruz-Garcia F, Royer S. 2011. Interspecifc reproductive barriers in the tomato clade: opportunities to decipher mechanisms of reproductive isolation. Sexual Plant Reproduction 24, 171-187.
3. Bernacchi D, Tanksley SD. 1997. An interspecifc backcross of Lycopersicon esculentum x L. hirsutum: linkage analysis and a QTL study of sexual compatibility factors and foral traits. Genetics 147, 861-877. (Pubitemid 27418593)
4. Camadro EL, Peloquin SJ. 1981. Cross-incompatibility between two sympatric polyploid Solanum species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 60, 65-70.
5. Castric V, Bechsgaard JS, Grenier S, Noureddine R, Schierup MH, Vekemans X. 2010. Molecular evolution within and between Self-Incompatibility species. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27, 11-20.
6. Chae K, Li Z, Li K, Morikis D, Kim ST, Mollet JC, de la Rosa N, Tan K, Lord EM. 2007. Two SCA (stigma/style cysteine-rich adhesin) isoforms show structural differences that correlate with their levels of in vitro pollen tube adhesion activity. Journal of Biological Chemistry 282, 33845-33858. (Pubitemid 350159545)
7. Chae K, Kieslich CA, Morikis D, Kim, SC, Lord EM. 2009. A gain-of-function mutation of Arabidopsis lipid transfer protein 5 disturbs pollen tube growth and fertilization. The Plant Cell 21, 3902-3914.
8. Chae K, Gonong BJ, Kim SC, Kieslich CA, Morikis D, Balasubramanian S, Lord EM. 2010. A multifaceted study of stigma/style cysteine-rich adhesin (SCA)-like Arabidopsis lipid transfer protein (LTPs) suggests diversifed roles for these LTPs in plant growth and reproduction. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 4277-4290.
9. Chetelat RT, DeVerna JW. 1991. Expression of unilateral incompatibility in pollen of Lycopersicon pennellii is determined by major loci on chromosome 1, 6 and 10. Theoretical Applied Genetics 82, 704-712.
10. Covey PA, Kondo K, Welch L, Frank E, Sianta S, Kumar A, Nuñez R, Lopez-Casado G, Van Der Knaap E, Rose JKC, McClure BA, Bedinger PA. 2010. Multiple features that distinguish unilateral incongruity and self-incompatibility in the tomato clade. The Plant Journal 64, 367-378.
11. Cresti M, van Went JL, Pacini E, Willemse MTM. 1976. Ultrastructure of transmitting tissue of Lycopersicon peruvianum style: development and histochemistry. Planta 132, 305-312.
12. de Nettancourt D. 2001. Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
13. Dumas CM, Rougier M, Zandonella P, Ciampolini F, Cresti M, Pacini E. 1978. The secretory stigma in Lycopersicon peruvianum Mill.: ontogenesis and grandular activity. Protoplasma 96, 173-187.
14. Emerson S. 1940. Growth of incompatible pollen tubes in Oenothera organensis. Botanical Gazette 101, 890-911.
15. Faegri K, van der Pijl L. 1979. The Principles of Pollination Ecology, Ed 3. Pergamon, Oxford.
16. Franklin-Tong V. 2008. Self-Incompatibility in Flowering Plants-Evolution, Diversity, and Mechanisms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
17. Gradziel TM, Robinson RW. 1989. Breakdown of self-incompatibility during pistil development in Lycopersicon peruvianum by modifed bud pollination. Sexual Plant Reproduction 2, 38-42.
18. Gradziel TM, Robinson RW. 1991. Overcoming unilateral breeding barriers between Lycopersicon peruvianum and cultivated tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Euphytica 54, 1-9.
19. Grun P, Aubertin M. 1966. The inheritance and expression of unilateral incompatibility in Solanum. Heredity 21, 131-138.
20. Hammami R, Ben Hamida J, Vergoten G, Fliss I. 2009. PhytAMP: a database dedicated to antimicrobial plant peptides. Nucleic Acids Research 37, D963-D968.
21. Hancock CN, Kent L, McClure BA. 2005. The stylar 120 kDa glycoprotein is required for S-specifc pollen rejection in Nicotiana. The Plant Journal 43, 716-723.
22. Hardon JJ. 1967. Unilateral incompatibility between SOLANUM PENNELLII and LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM. Genetics 57, 795-808.
23. Haring V, Gray JE, McClure BA, Anderson MA, Clarke AE. 1990. Self-incompatibility: a self-recognition system in plants. Science 250, 937-941. (Pubitemid 120031792)
24. Herrero M, Dickinson HG. 1980. Ultrastructural and physiological differences between buds and mature fowers of Petunia hybrida prior to and following pollination. Planta 148, 138-145.
25. Hogenboom NG. 1975. lncompatibility and incongruity: Two different mechanisms for the non-functioning of intimate partner relationships. Proceedings of The Royal Society of London Series B 188, 361-375.
26. Kachroo A, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB. 2002. Self-incompatibility in the Brassicaceae: Receptor-ligand signaling and cell-to-cell communication. The Plant Cell 14 (suppl), S227-S238. (Pubitemid 34609240)
27. Kearns, CA, Inouye, DW, eds. 1993. Techniques for Pollination Biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, CO.
28. Kermicle JL, Evans MMS. 2005. Pollen-pistil barriers to crossing in maize and teosinte result from incongruity rather than active rejection. Sexual Plant Reproduction 18, 187-194. (Pubitemid 41712836)
29. Kessler SA, Shimosato-Asano H, Keinath NF, Wuest SE, Ingram G, Panstruga R, Grossniklaus U. 2010. Conserved molecular components for pollen tube reception and fungal invasion. Science 330, 968-972.
30. Konar RN, Linskens HF. 1966. Physiology and biochemistry of the stigma fuid of Petunia hybrida. Planta 71, 372-387.
31. Kondo K, Yamamoto M, Itahashi R, Sato T, Egashira H, Hattori T, Kowyama Y. 2002a. Insights into the evolution of self-compatibility in Lycopersicon from a study of stylar factors. The Plant Journal 30, 143-153. (Pubitemid 34536235)
32. Kondo K, Yamamoto M, Matton DP, Sato T, Hirai M, Norioka S, Hattori T, Kowyama Y. 2002b. Cultivated tomato has defects in both S-RNase and HT genes required for stylar function of self-incompatibility. The Plant Journal 29, 627-636. (Pubitemid 34248754)
33. Kuboyama T, Chung CS, Takeda G. 1994. The diversity of interspecifc pollen-pistil incongruity in Nicotiana. Sexual Plant Reproduction 7, 250-258.
34. Lewis D, Crowe LK. 1958. Unilateral interspecifc incompatibility in fowering plants. Heredity 12, 233-256.
35. Li W, Royer S, Chetelat RT. 2010. Fine mapping of ui6.1, a gametophytic factor controlling pollen-side Unilateral Incompatibility in interspecifc Solanum hybrids. Genetics 185, 1069-1080.
36. Liedl BE, McCormick S, Mutschler MA. 1996. Unilateral incongruity in crosses involving Lycopersicon pennellii and L. esculentum is distinct from self-incompatibility in expression, timing and location. Sexual Plant Reproduction 9, 299-308. (Pubitemid 26381022)
37. Lin P, Xia L, Ng TB. 2007. First isolation of an antifungal lipid transfer peptide from seeds of a Brassica species. Peptides 28, 1514-1519. (Pubitemid 47247959)
38. Linskens HF. 1975. Incompatibility in Petunia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 188, 299-311
39. Lowry DB, Modliszewski JL, Wright KM, Wu CA, Willis JH. 2008. The strength and genetic basis of reproductive isolating barriers in fowering plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 363, 3009-3021.
40. Lush WM. 1999. Whither chemotropism and pollen tube guidance? Trends in Plant Science 4, 413-418.
41. Marín-Rodríguez MC, Orchard J, Seymour GB. 2002. Pectate lyases, cell wall degradation and fruit softening. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 2115-2119. (Pubitemid 35181202)
42. Marshall E, Costa LM, Gutierrez-Marcos, J. 2011. Cysteine-Rich Peptides (CRPs) mediate diverse aspects of cell-cell communication in plant reproduction and development. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 1677-1686.
43. Matsuzaki T, Koiwai A, Kawashima N. 1983. Changes in stigma-specifc lipids in tobacco plant during fower development. Plant and Cell Physiology 24, 207-213.
44. McClure B. 2009. Darwin's foundation for investigating self-incompatibility and the progress toward a physiological model for S-RNase-based SI. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 1069-1081.
45. McClure BA, Franklin-Tong V. 2006. Gametophytic self-incompatibility: understanding the cellular mechanisms involved in "self" pollen tube inhibition. Planta 224, 233-245. (Pubitemid 43946043)
46. McClure BA, Mou B, Canevascini S, Bernatzky R. 1999. A small asparagine-rich protein required for S-allele-specifc pollen rejection in Nicotiana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 96, 13548-13553.
47. McCubbin AG, Kao T-H. 2000. Molecular recognition and response in pollen-pistil interactions. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 16, 333-364. (Pubitemid 32037510)
48. Murfett J, Bourque JE, McClure BA. 1995. Antisense suppression of S-RNase expression in Nicotiana using RNA polymerase II-and III-transcribed gene constructs. Plant Molecular Biology 29, 201-212.
49. Murfett J, Strabaia JT, Zurek DM, Mou B, Beecher B, McClure BA. 1996. S RNase and interspecifc pollen rejection in the genus Nicotiana: multiple pollen rejection pathways contribute to unilateral incompatibility between self-incompatible and self-compatible species. The Plant Cell 8, 943-958.
50. Muschietti J, Dirchs L, Vancanneyt G, McCormick S. 1994. LAT52 protein is essential for tomato pollen development: pollen expressing antisense LAT52 RNA hydrates and germinates abnormally and cannot achieve fertilization. The Plant Journal 6, 321-388.
51. Nakamura Y, Arimitsu H, Yamaryo Y, Awai K, Masuda T, Shimada H, Takamiya K, Ohta H. 2003. Digalactosyldiacylglycerol is a major glycolipid in foral organs of Petunia hybrida. Lipids 38, 1107-1112. (Pubitemid 37444635)
52. Nakamura Y, Kobayashi K, Ohta H. 2009. Activation of galactolipid biosynthesis in development of pistils and pollen tubes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 47, 535-539.
53. O'Brien M, Kapfer C, Major G, Laurin M, Bertrand C, Kondo K, Kowyama Y, Matton DP. 2002. Molecular analysis of the stylar-expressed Solanum chacoense asparagine-rich protein family related to the HT modifer of gametophytic self-incompatibility in Nicotiana. The Plant Journal 32, 1-12.
54. Okuda S, Tsutsui H, Shiina K, Sprunck S, Takeuchi H, Yui R, Kasahara RD, Hamamura Y, Mizukami A, Susaki D, Kawano N, Sakakibara T, Namiki S, Itoh K, Otsuka K, Matsuzaki M, Nozaki H, Kuroiwa T, Nakano A, Kanaoka MM, Dresselhaus T, Sasaki N, Higashiyama T. 2009. Defensin-like polypeptide LUREs are pollen tube attractants secreted from synergid cells. Nature 458, 357-361.
55. Pandey KK. 1981. Evolution of unilateral incompatibility in fowering plants: further evidence in favour of twin specifcities controlling intra-and interspecifc incompatibility. New Phytologist 89, 705-728.
56. Park SY, Lord EM. 2003. Expression studies of SCA in lily and confrmation of its role in pollen tube adhesion. Plant Molecular Biology 51, 183-189. (Pubitemid 36189183)
57. Puerta AR, Ushijima K, Koba T, Sassa H. 2009. Identifcation and functional analysis of pistil-part self-incompatibility factor HT-B of Petunia. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 1309-1318.
58. R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. www.R-project.org/.
59. Rick CM, Holle M, Thorp RW. 1978. Rates of cross-pollination in Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium: impact of genetic variation in foral characters. Plant Systamatics and Evolution 129, 31-44.
60. Rieseberg LH, Willis JH. 2007. Plant speciation. Science 317, 910-914. (Pubitemid 47301311)
61. Sánchez AM, Bosch M, Bots M, Nieuwland J, Feron R, Mariani C. 2004. Pistil factors controlling pollination. The Plant Cell 16, S98-S106. (Pubitemid 38774220)
62. Singh PK, Rathore SVS, Tripathi SK. 2004. Studies on self-incompatibility and heterotic response in sprouting broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica Plenck). Acta Horticulturae 706, 179-187. (Pubitemid 43882204)
63. Sink KC, Power JB. 1978. Incongruity of interspecifc and intergeneric crosses involving Nicotiana and Petunia species that exhibit potential for somatic hybridization. Euphytica 27, 725-730.
64. Spooner DM, Peralta IE, Knapp S. 2005. Comparison of AFLPs with other markers for phylogenetic inference in wild tomatoes [Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst.]. Taxon 54, 43-61. (Pubitemid 40440895)
65. Stephenson AG, Good SV, Vogler DW. 2000. Interrelationships among inbreeding depression, plasticity in the self-incompatibility system, and the breeding system of Campanula rapunculoides L. (Campanulaceae). Annals of Botany 85, 211-219.
66. Stotz HU, Spence B, Wang YJ. 2009. A defensin from tomato with dual function in defense and development. Plant Molecular Biology 71, 131-143.
67. Tang W, Kelley D, Ezcurra I, Cotter R, McCormick S. 2004. LeSTIG1, an extracellular binding partner for the pollen receptor kinases LePRK1 and LePRK2, promotes pollen tube growth in vitro. The Plant Journal 39, 343-353. (Pubitemid 39040140)
68. The Tomato Genome Consortium. 2012. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into feshy fruit evolution. Nature 485, 635-641.
69. Tung C, Dwyer KG, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB. 2005. Genome-wide identifcation of genes expressed in Arabidopsis pistils specifcally along the path of pollen tube growth. Plant Physiology 138, 977-989. (Pubitemid 43793173)
70. Verhoeven T, Feron R, Wolters-Arts M, Edqvist J, Gerats T, Derksen J, Mariani C. 2005. STIG1 controls exudate secretion in the pistil of petunia and tobacco. Plant Physiology 138, 153-160. (Pubitemid 43138116)
71. Waser NM, Ollerton J. 2006. Plant-Pollinator Interactions: from Specialization to Generalization. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
72. Webb MC, Williams EG. 1988. Effects of temperature, light, nutrients and carbon dioxide on the strength of the self-incompatibility response in detached fowers of Lycopersicon peruvianum. Annals of Botany (London) 61, 395-404.
73. Williams EG, Knox RB. 1982. Quantitative analysis of pollen tube growth in Lycopersicon peruvianum. Journal of Palynology 18, 65-74.
74. Wise S, Reidegeld KA, Meyer HE, Warscheid B. 2007. Protein labeling by iTRAQ: a new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research. Proteomics 7, 340-350. (Pubitemid 46293976)
75. Wolters-Arts M, Mary Lush W, Mariani C. 1998. Lipids are required for directional pollen-tube growth. Nature 392, 818-821. (Pubitemid 28225322)
76. Wu Y, Meeley RB, Cosgrove DJ. 2001. Analysis and expression of the α-expansin and β-expansin gene families in maize. Plant Physiology 126, 222-232. (Pubitemid 32532875)
77. Yeats TH, Rose JKC. 2008. The biochemistry and biology of extracellular plant lipid-transfer proteins (LTPs). Protein Science 17, 191-198. (Pubitemid 351171831)