Sampling of alternatives in Multivariate Extreme Value (MEV) models

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 48, Issue , 2013, Pages 31-52

  Guevara, C Angelo ^a   Ben Akiva, Moshe E ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Chile)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

GEV models; MEV; Sampling of alternatives

Indexed keywords

RESEARCH; TRANSPORTATION;

ASYMPTOTIC NORMALITY; FINITE SAMPLE PROPERTIES; MULTIVARIATE EXTREMES; PAPER FINISH; PORTUGAL; RESIDENTIAL LOCATIONS; SMALL SAMPLES;

SAMPLING;

LOCATION DECISION; LOGIT ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; SAMPLING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

LISBOA [PORTUGAL]; LISBON; PORTUGAL;

MINK ENTERITIS VIRUS;

EID: 84871799111     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ben-Akiva, M., 1973. Structure of Passenger Travel Demand Models. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
2. Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S. Discrete Choice Analysis, Theory and Application to Travel Demand 1985, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Berkovec J., Rust J. A nested logit model of automobile holdings for one vehicle households. Transportation Research Part B 1985, 19(4):275-285.
4. Berndt E., Hall H., Hall R., Hausman J. Estimation and inference in nonlinear structural models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 1974, 3(4):653-665.
5. Bertsekas D., Tsitsiklis J. Introduction to Probability 2002, Athena Scientific Press, Belmont, MA.
6. Bierlaire M., 2003. BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference. Ascona, Switzerland.
7. Bierlaire M. A theoretical analysis of the cross-nested logit model. Annals of Operations Research 2001, 144(1):287-300.
8. Bierlaire M., Bolduc D., McFadden D. The estimation of generalized extreme value models from choice-based samples. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42(4):381-394.
9. Chen Y., Duann L., Hu W. The estimation of discrete choice models with large choice-set. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 2005, 6:1724-1739.
10. Daly A.J. ALOGIT 3.2 User's Guide. Hague Consulting Group 1992, The Hague, Netherlands.
11. Daly, A., Zachary, S., 1979. Improved multiple choice models. In: Hensher, Dalvi (Eds.), Identifying and Measuring the Determinants of Model Choice. Teakfild. London.
12. Domanski, A., 2009. Estimating mixed logit recreation demand models with large choice sets. Presented at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Milwaukee, WI.
13. Frejinger E., Bierlaire M., Ben-Akiva M. Sampling of alternatives for route choice modeling. Transportation Research Part B 2009, 43(10):984-994.
14. Garrow L., Bodea T., Lee M. Generation of synthetic datasets for discrete choice analysis. Transportation 2010, 37(2):183-202.
15. Garrow, L., Koppelman, F., Nelson, L., 2005. Efficient estimation of nested logit models using choice-based samples. In: Mahmassani (Ed.), Transportation and Traffic Theory Flow, Dynamics and Interactions: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Oxford, UK, pp. 525-544.
16. Guevara, C.A., 2010. Endogeneity and Sampling of Alternatives in Spatial Choice Models. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
17. Guevara C.A., Ben-Akiva M. Change of scale and forecasting with the control-function method in logit models. Transportation Science 2012, 46(3):425-437.
18. Guevara C.A., Ben-Akiva M. Endogeneity in residential location choice models. Transportation Research Record 2006, 1977:60-66.
19. Hansen E. Industrial location choice in Sao Pablo Brazil, a nested logit model. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1987, 17(1):89-108.
20. Heckman J. Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica 1978, 46(4):931-959.
21. Imbens G., Lancaster L. Combining micro and macro data in microeconometric models. Review of Economic Studies 1994, 61(4):655-680.
22. Lee B., Waddell P. Residential mobility and location choice: a nested logit model with sampling of alternatives. Transportation 2010, 37(4):587-601.
23. Manski C., Lerman S. The estimation of choice probabilities from choice based samples. Econometrica 1977, 45(8):1977-1988.
24. Manski, C., McFadden, D., 1981. Alternative estimators and sample designs for discrete choice analysis. In: Manski, McFadden (Eds.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 2-50.
25. Martinez L., Viegas J. Effects of transportation accessibility on residential property values: a hedonic price model in the Lisbon metropolitan area. Transportation Research Record 2009, 2115:127-137.
26. Martinez, L., Abreu, J., Viegas, J., 2010. Assessment of residential location satisfaction in Lisbon metropolitan area. Presented at the 89th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
27. McConnel K., Tseng W. Some preliminary evidence on sampling of alternatives with the random parameters logit. Marine Resource Economics 2000, 14(4):317-332.
28. McFadden, D., 1978. Modeling the choice of residential location. In: Karlquist, Lundqvist, Snickers, Weibull (Eds.), Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 75-96.
29. Nerella S., Bhat C. A numerical analysis of the effect of sampling of alternatives in discrete choice models. Transportation Research Record 2004, 1894:11-19.
30. Parsons G., Kealy M. Randomly drawn opportunity sets in a random utility model of lake recreation. Land Economics 1992, 68(1):93-106.
31. Papola A. Some developments on the cross-nested logit model. Transportation Research Part B 2004, 38(9):833-851.
32. Petrin, A., Train, K., 2002. Omitted Product Attributes in Discrete Choice Models. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
33. R Development Core Team, 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
34. Rayle, L., 2008. Initial Insights from Spatial Analysis of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, Working Paper, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
35. Rivera M., Tiglao N. Modeling residential location choice, workplace location choice and mode choice of two-worker households in Metro Manila. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 2005, 5:1167-1178.
36. Small K. A discrete choice model for ordered alternatives. Econometrica 1987, 55(2):409-424.
37. Sermons M., Koppelman F. Representing the differences between female and male commute behavior in residential location choice models. Geography 2001, 9(2):101-110.
38. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. second ed.
39. Train K., McFadden D., Ben-Akiva M. The demand for local telephone service: a fully discrete model of residential calling patterns and service choice. Rand Journal of Economics 1987, 18(1):109-123.
40. Vovsha, P., 1999. Comparative analysis of different spatial interaction models. Presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
41. Vovsha P., Bekhor S. The link-nested logit model of route choice: overcoming the route overlapping problem. Transportation Research Record 1998, 1645:133-142.
42. Waddell, P., Wang, L., Liu, X., 2008. UrbanSim: an evolving planning support system for evolving communities. In: Brail (Ed.), Planning Support Systems for Cities and Regions. Lincoln Institute for Land Policy, Cambridge, MA, pp. 103-138.
43. Walker, J., 2001. Extended Discrete Choice Models: Integrated Framework, Flexible Error Structures, and Latent Variables. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
44. Watanatada T., Ben-Akiva M. Forecasting urban travel demand for quick policy analysis with disaggregate choice models: a Monte Carlo simulation approach. Transportation Research Part A 1979, 13(4):241-248.
45. White H. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 1982, 50(1):1-25.
46. Williams H. On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of users benefit. Environment and Planning 1977, 9(3):285-344.
47. Williams H., Ortúzar J. Behavioural theories of dispersion and the mis-specification of travel demand models. Transportation Research Part B 1982, 16(3):167-219.