Some preliminary evidence on sampling of alternatives with the random parameters logit

Marine Resource Economics

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 317-332

  McConnell, Kenneth E ^a   Tseng, Wei Chun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative sampling; Choice set; Heterogeneity; Parameter estimates; Random parameters logit

Indexed keywords

EID: 13244250159     PISSN: 07381360     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/mre.14.4.42629276     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Ben-Akiva, M., and S.R. Lerman. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Boston, MA: MIT Press
2. Bockstael, N.E., M. Hanemann, I.E. Strand. 1986. Measuring the Benefits of Water Quality Improvement Using Recreation Demand Models. Environmental Protection Agency. Cooperative Agreement CR-81143-01-1
3. Haab, T., and R. Hicks. 1997. Accounting for Choice Set Endogeneity in Random Utility Models for Recreational Demand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34(2):127-47 (Pubitemid 28010319)
4. Herriges, J.A., and D.J. Phaneuf. 1999. Controlling Correlation across Choice Occasions and Sites in a Repeated Mixed Logit Model of Recreation Demand. Working paper, pp. 32
5. Hicks, R., S. Steinback, A. Gautam, and E. Thunberg. 1999. Volume II: The Economic Value of New England and Mid-Atlantic Sportfishing in 1994. NOAA Technical Memorandum pp. 1-26. NMFS Office of Science and Technology, Silver Spring, MD
6. Hicks, R., and I.E. Strand. 1999. The Extent of Information: Its Relevance for Random Utility Models. Land Economics In press
7. McFadden, D. 1978. Modeling the Choice of Residential Location. Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, A. Karlqvist, L. Loudqvist, F. Snickars, and J.W. Weibull, eds. pp. 75-96. Amsterdam: North-Holland
8. Parsons, G.R., and M.J. Kealy. 1992. Randomly Drawn Opportunity Sets in a Random Utility Model of Lake Recreation. Land Economics 68(1):93-106
9. Parsons, G.R., M. Massey, and T. Tomasi. 1999. Familiar and Favorite Sites in Random Utility Models of Recreation Demand. Working paper, pp. 1-16
10. Train, K.E. 1998. Recreation Demand Models with Taste Difference over People. Land Economics 74(2):230-39 (Pubitemid 28437633)
11. -. 1999. Mixed Logit Models for Recreation Demand. Valuing Recreation and the Environment: Revealed Preference Methods in Theory and Practice, J.A. Herriges and C.L. Kling eds. pp. 121-40. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd