Linking habitats for multiple species

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 40, Issue , 2013, Pages 336-339

  Brás, Raul ^a   Cerdeira, J Orestes ^b,c   Alagador, Diogo ^d   Araújo, Miguel B ^d,e,f  

^a ISEG LISBON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

^c Universidade de Lisboa   (Portugal)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

^e MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

^f UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Connectivity; Cost efficiency; Graph theory; Minimum Steiner tree; Multispecies conservation plan

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVITY; COST-EFFICIENCY; COST-EFFICIENT; MULTI-SPECIES; MULTIPLE SPECIES; OPEN-SOURCE PROGRAM; STEINER TREES;

BIODIVERSITY; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; GRAPH THEORY;

ECOSYSTEMS;

ALGORITHM; BIODIVERSITY; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONNECTIVITY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DISPERSAL; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT TYPE;

EID: 84871751865     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alagador D., Cerdeira J.O. Designing spatially-explicit ecological reserve networks in the presence of mandatory sites. Biological Conservation 2007, 137:254-262.
2. Alagador D., Triviño M., Cerdeira J.O., Brás R., Araújo M.B. Linking like with like: optimising connectivity between environmentally-similar habitats. Landscape Ecology 2012, 27:291-301.
3. Araújo M.B., Alagador D., Cabeza M., Nogués-Bravo D., Thuiller W. Climate change threatens European conservation areas. Ecology Letters 2011, 14:484-492.
4. Araújo M.B., New M. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2007, 22:42-47.
5. Brooks T.M., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., da Fonseca G.A.B., Rylands A.B., Konstant W.R., Flick P., Pilgrim J., Oldfield S., Magin G., Hilton-Taylor C. Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 2002, 16:909-923.
6. Carroll C., McRae B.H., Brookes A. Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America. Conservation Biology 2012, 26:78-87.
7. Cerdeira J.O., Gaston K.J., Pinto L.S. Connectivity in priority area selection for conservation. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 2005, 10:183-192.
8. Cerdeira J.O., Pinto L.S., Cabeza M., Gaston K.J. Species specific connectivity in reserve-network design using graphs. Biological Conservation 2010, 143:408-415.
9. Du D., Hu X. Steiner Tree Problems in Computer Communication Networks 2008, World Scientific Publishing Company.
10. Fall A., Fortin M.-J., Manseau M., O'Brien D. Spatial graphs: principles and applications for habitat connectivity. Ecosystems 2007, 10:448-461.
11. Feo T.A., Resende M.G.C. Greedy randomized adaptive search procedures. Journal of Global Optimization 1995, 6:109-133.
12. Fuller T., Mungua M., Mayfield M., Sánchez-Cordero V., Sarkar S. Incorporating connectivity into conservation planning: a multi-criteria case study from central Mexico. Biological Conservation 2006, 133:131-142.
13. Fuller T., Sarkar S. LQGraph: a software package for optimizing connectivity in conservation planning. Environmental Modelling and Software 2006, 21:750-755.
14. Garey M.R., Johnson D.S. Computers and Intractability: a Guide to the Theory of NP Completeness 1979, W. H. Freeman & Company, San Francisco.
15. Hanski I. The Shrinking World: Ecological Consequences of Habitat Loss. Excellence in Ecology 2005, vol. 14. International Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany.
16. Hwang F., Richards D., Winter P. The Steiner Tree Problem. Annals of Discrete Mathematics 1992, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
17. Lai, K.J., Gomes, C.P., Schwartz, M.K., McKelvey, K.S., Calkin, D.E., Montgomery, C.A., 2011. The Steiner multigraph problem: wildlife corridor design for multiple species. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-11); San Francisco, CA, USA; August 7-11, 2011. AAAI Press, 8 p.
18. Landguth E.L., Hand B.K., Glassy J., Cushman S.A., Sawaya M.A. Unicor: a species connectivity and corridor network simulator. Ecography 2012, 35:9-14.
19. Luque S., Saura S., Fortin M.-J. Landscape connectivity analysis for conservation: insights from combining new methods with ecological and genetic data. Landscape Ecology 2012, 27:153-157.
20. McRae B.H., Beier P. Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2007, 104:19885-19890.
21. McRae B.H., Shah V.B. Circuitscape User Guide 2011, The University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
22. Önal H., Briers R.A. Incorporating spatial criteria in optimum reserve network selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 2002, 269:2437-2441.
23. Önal H., Briers R.A. Selection of minimum-boundary reserve network. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 2003, 270:1487-1491.
24. Önal H., Briers R.A. Designing a conservation reserve network with minimal fragmentation: a linear integer programming approach. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 2005, 10:193-202.
25. Pressey R.L., Nicholls A.O. Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring versus iterative approaches. Biological Conservation 1989, 50:199-218.
26. Saura S., Torné J. Conefor sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. Environmental Modelling and Software 2009, 24:135-139.
27. Sessions J. Solving for habitat connections as a Steiner network problem. Forest Science 1992, 38:203-207.
28. Urban D., Keitt T. Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 2001, 82:1205-1218.
29. Vazirani V.V. Steiner forest. Approximation Algorithms 2003, 197-211. Springer-Verlag.
30. Williams J.C. Delineated protected wildlife corridors with multi-objective programming. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 1998, 3:77-86.