Linguistic intuition and calibration

Linguistics and Philosophy

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 443-460

  Maynes, Jeffrey ^a  

^a ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Linguistic intuition; Linguistic methodology; Philosophy of linguistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871720692     PISSN: 01650157     EISSN: 15730549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10988-012-9122-0     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Asudeh, A., & Keller, F. (2001). Experimental evidence for a prediction-based binding theory. In M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston, & S. Neuvel (Eds.), Papers from the 37th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (Vol. 1). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
2. Badecker, W., & Straub, K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 748-769.
3. Bogen, J., & Woodward, J. (1988). Saving the phenomena. Philosophical Review, 97(3), 303-352.
4. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, M. (2007). The wolf in sheep's clothing: Against a new judgment-driven imperialism. Theoretical Linguistics, 33(3), 319-333.
5. Büring, D. (2005). Binding theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
7. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: It's nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
8. Cowart, W. (1997). Experimental syntax. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Culbertson, J., & Gross, S. (2009). Are linguists better subjects? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 721-736.
10. Cummins, R. (1998). Reflection on reflective equilibrium. In M. R. DePaul & W. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers.
11. Dabrowska, E. (2010). Naive v. expert intuitions: An empirical study of acceptability judgments. The Linguistic Review, 27, 1-23.
12. den Dikken, M., Bernstein, J. B., Tortora, C., & Zanuttini, R. (2007). Data and grammar: Means and individuals. Theoretical Linguistics, 33, 335-352.
13. Devitt, M. (2006a). Ignorance of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Devitt, M. (2006b). Intuitions in linguistics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 481-513.
15. Devitt, M. (2010). Linguistic intuitions revisited. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(4), 833-865.
16. Evans, V. (2012). Cognitive linguistics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(2), 129-141.
17. Featherston, S. (2007). Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot. Theoretical Linguistics, 33, 269-318.
18. Ferreira, F. (2005). Psycholinguistics, formal grammars and cognitive science. The Linguistic Review, 22, 365-380.
19. Fitzgerald, G. (2009). Linguistic intuitions. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(1), 123-160.
20. Keller, F., & Asudeh, A. (2001). Constraints on linguistic coreference: Structural vs pragmatic factors. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Labov, W. (1975). What is a linguistic fact?. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.
22. Labov, W. (1996). When intuitions fail. In L. McNair, K. Singer, L. Dolbrin, & M. Aucon (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on theory and data in linguistics. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
23. Ludlow, P. (2011). The philosophy of generative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Lycan, W. (1988). Judgment and justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Maynes, J., & Gross, S. (Manuscript). Linguistic intuitions.
26. Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(1), 5-19.
27. Phillips, C. (2009). Should we impeach armchair linguists? In S. Iwasaki (Ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics. Chicago: CLSI Publications.
28. Phillips, C., Wagers, M., & Lau, E. (2011). Grammatical illusions and selective fallibility in real time language comprehension. In J. Runner (Ed.), Experiments at the interfaces, Vol. 37 of Syntax & semantics. Bingley: Emerald Publications.
29. Riemer, N. (2009). Grammaticality as evidence and as prediction in a Galilean linguistics. Language Sciences, 31, 612-633.
30. Runner, J. T., Sussman, R. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2006). Processing reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrases. Cognitive Science, 30, 193-241.
31. Schütze, C. T. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
32. Segall, M., Campbell, D., & Herskovits, M. J. (1966). The influence of culture on visual perception. Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.
33. Sprouse, J. (2007). A program for experimental syntax: Finding the relationship between acceptability and grammatical knowledge. Dissertation, University of Maryland.
34. Sprouse, J. (2011). A test of the cognitive assumptions of magnitude estimation: Commutativity does not hold for acceptability judgments. Language, 87(2), 274-288.
35. Sprouse, J., & Almeida, D. (2012). Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger's Core Syntax. Journal of Linguistics, 48, 609-652.
36. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632-1634.
37. Textor, M. (2009). Devitt on the epistemic authority of linguistic intuitions. Erkenntnis, 71, 395-405.
38. Wasow, T., & Arnold, J. (2005). Intuitions in linguistic argumentation. Lingua, 115, 1481-1496.
39. Weinberg, J. M., Crowley, S., Gonnerman, C., Vanderwalker, I., & Swain, S. (2012). Intuition & calibration. Essays in Philosophy, 13(1), 256-283.
40. Weiskrantz, L. (1990). Blindsight: A case study and its implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Weskott, T., & Fanselow, G. (2011). On the informativity of different measures of linguistic acceptability. Language, 87(2), 249-273.
42. Xiang, M., Dillon, B., & Phillips, C. (2009). Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence. Brain & Language, 108, 40-55.