Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot

Theoretical Linguistics

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 269-318

  Featherston, Sam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37149040455     PISSN: 03014428     EISSN: 16134060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/TL.2007.020     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bader M. and Bayer J. (2006). Case and Linking in Language Comprehension. Dordrecht: Springer.
2. Bard E., Robertson D. and Sorace A. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72 (1), 32-68.
3. Bayer J. (1990). Notes on the ECP in English and German. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanischen Linguistik 30, 1-55.
4. Bech G. (1955). Studien über das deutsche verbum infinitum, volume 1. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
5. Boersma P. and Hayes B. (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 45-86.
6. Bresnan J., Dingare S. and Manning C. (2001). Soft constraints mirror hard constraints: Voice and person in English and Lummit. In: Butt M. and King T. (eds). Proceedings of LFGOl Conference, 13-32. Stanford: CSLI.
7. Bybee J. and Hopper P. (eds) (2001). Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
8. Cowart W. (1997). Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgements. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
9. Chomsky N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
10. _. (1964). Degrees of grammaticalness. In: Fodor J. A. and Kate J. (eds). The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language, 384-389. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11. _. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
12. _. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
13. Culicover P. and Jackendoff R. (2005). Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP.
14. Fanselow G. (1987). Konfiguationalität: Untersuchungen zur Universalgrammatik am Beispiel des Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.
15. Featherston S. (2002). Coreferential objects in German: Experimental evidence on reflexivity. Linguistische Berichte 192, 457-484.
16. _. (2003). That-trace in German. Lingua 1091, 1-26.
17. _. (2004). The Decathlon Model: Design features for an empirical syntax. In: Kepser S. and Reis M. (eds). Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives. Berlin: de Gruyter.
18. _. (2005). Universals and grammaticality: Wh-constraints in German and English. Linguistics 43 (4), 667-7'11.
19. Gärtner H.-M. (2001). Are There V2 Relative Clauses in German? Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3 (2), 97-141.
20. Greenbaum S. (1977). The linguist as experimenter. In: Eckman F. (ed). Current Themes in Linguistics: Bilingualism, Experimental Linguistics, and Language Typologies, 125-144. New York: Wiley.
21. Grewendorf G. (1985). Anaphern bei Objekt-Koreferenz im Deutschen. Ein Problem für die Rektions-Bindungs-Theorie. In: Abraham. W. (ed). Erklaerende Syntax des Deutschen, 137-171. Tübingen: Narr.
22. _. (1988). Aspekte der Deutschen Syntax. Eine Rektions-Bindungs- Anatyse. Tübingen: Narr.
23. _. (1995). German. A grammatical sketch. In: Jacobs J., von. Stechow A., Sternefeld W. and Vennemann T. (eds). Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, 1288-1319. Berlin: de Gruyter.
24. Haider H. (1983). Connectedness effects in German. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanischen Linguistik 23, 82-11.9.
25. _. (1993). Deutsche Syntax- Generativ. Tübingen: Narr.
26. Hemforth B. and Konieczny L. (eds) (2000). German Sentence Processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
27. Huddieston R. and Pullum. G. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Keller F. (2000). Gradience in grammar: Experimental and computational aspects of degrees of grammaticality. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
29. Keller F., Corley M., Corley S., Konieczny L. and Todirascu A. (1998). WebExp: A Java Toolbox for Web-Based Psychological Experiments. Technical Report HCRC/TR-99, University of Edinburgh.
30. Kiziak T. (2007). Long Extraction or Parenthetical Insertion? Evidence from Judgement Studies. In: Dene N. and Kavalova Y. (eds). Parentheticals, 121-144. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
31. Labov W. (1.975). Empirical foundations of linguistic theory In: Austerlitz R. (ed). The Scope of American Linguistics, 77-133. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.
32. _. (1996). When intuitions fail. In: McNair L., Singer K., Dolbrin L. and Aucon M. (eds). Papers from the Parasession on Theory and Data in Linguistics. Chicago Linguistics Society 32, 77-1.06.
33. Lakoff G. (1.973). Fuzzy grammar and the performance/competence terminology game. Chicago Linguistics Society 9, 271-291.
34. Lutz U. (1996). Some notes on extraction theory. In: Lutz U. and Pafel J. (eds). On Extraction and Extraposition in German, 1-44, Amsterdam.: Benjamins.
35. Müller G. (1995). A-bar Syntax. A Study in Movement Types. Berlin: de Gruyter.
36. Newmeyer F. (1983). Grammatical Theory: Its limits and possibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. _. (2003). Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language 79, 682-707.
38. Pechmann T., Uszkoreit H., Engelkamp J. and Zerbst D. (1996). Wortstellung im deutschen Mittelfeld: Linguistische Theorie und psycholinguistische Evidenz. In: Habel C., Kanngießer S. and Rickheit G. (eds). Perspektiven der Kognitiven Linguistik, 257-299. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
39. Penke M. and Rosenbach A. (2004). What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics? The case of innateness. Studies in Language 28: 3. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
40. Pollard C. and Sag I, (1.994). Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Poulton E. C. (1989). Bias in Quantifying Judgments. Hove and London: Erlbaum.
42. Primus B. (1987). Grammatische Hierarchien. Eine Beschreibung und Erklärung von Regularitäten des Deutschen ohne grammatische Relationen. München: Fink.
43. Quirk R. and Svartvik J. (1966). Investigating linguistic acceptability. London: Mouton.
44. Quirk R., Greenbaum. S., Leech G. and Svartvik J. (1.985). A Comprehensive Grammar of English. London: Longman.
45. Radford A. (1988). Transformational Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
46. Roeper T. (1982). Review of Halle, Bresnan and Miller (eds). Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. Language 52, 467-470.
47. Schmid T., Bader M. and Bayer J. (2005). Coherence effects: An experimental approach. In: Kepser S. and Reis M. (eds). Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives, 435-56. Berlin: de Gruyter.
48. Schütze C. (1996). The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgements and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Stechow A. von and Sternefeld W. (1989). Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens. Opladen: West-deutscher Verlag.
50. Uszkoreit H. (1987). Word Order and Constituent Structure in German. CLSI Lecture notes no. 8, Stanford: CSLI.
51. Wasow T., Jaeger F. and Orr D. (2005). Lexical, variation in relativizer frequency. Paper at DGfS annual conference 2005, Cologne.
52. Winkler S. (2005). Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar. Berlin: de Gruyter.
53. Wurmbrand S. (2001). Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure. Berlin: de Gruyter.