Short (5 and 7 mm long) porous implants in the posterior atrophic maxilla: A 5-year report of a prospective single-cohort study

European Journal of Oral Implantology

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 265-272

  Perelli, Michele ^a   Abundo, Roberto ^a,b   Corrente, Giuseppe ^a,b   Saccone, Carlo ^a  

^a Private Practice   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Deproteinised bovine bone; Implant prosthesis; Osteotome sinus elevation; Posterior maxilla; Short dental implants

Indexed keywords

BIO OSS; BIO-OSS; MINERAL;

ARTICLE; ATROPHY; BONE MATRIX; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REGENERATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOTOMY; PERIIMPLANTITIS; PHYSIOLOGY; POROSITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ATROPHY; BONE MATRIX; BONE SUBSTITUTES; COHORT STUDIES; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MAXILLA; MINERALS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOTOMY; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; POROSITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84871700582     PISSN: 17562406     EISSN: 17562414     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants - an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:86-93.
2. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980; 38:613-616.
3. Bahat O, Fontanessi RV. Efficacy of implant placement after bone grafting for three dimensional reconstruction of the posterior jaw. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:220-231.
4. Tatum HJ. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:207-229.
5. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15:152, 154-156,158 passim, quiz 162.
6. Summers RB. The osteotome technique: Part 3-Less invasive methods for elevating the sinus floor. Compendium 1994;15:689,700,702-704.
7. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Rees J, Karasoulos D, Felice P, Alissa R, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(3):CD008397.
8. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172.
9. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae. A 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:303-311.
10. Smiler DG, Johnson PW, Lozada JL, Misch C, Rosenlicht JL, Tatum OH Jr, Wagner JR. Sinus lift grafts and endosseous implants. Treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:151-186.
11. Garg AK. Augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus for placement of dental implants: Anatomy, physiology, and procedures. Implant Dent 1999;8:36-46.
12. Rose PS, Summers RB, Mellado JR, Salkin LM, Shanaman RH, Marks MH, Fugazzotto PA. The bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: Multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:853-858.
13. Wallace SS, Froum SJ,. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:328-343.
14. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24: 565-577.
15. Raghoebar GM, Timmenga NM, Reintsema H, Stegenga B, Vissink A. Maxillary bone grafting for insertion of endosseous implants: Results after 12-124 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:279-286.
16. Hurzeler MB, Kirsch A, Ackermann KL, Quinones CR. Reconstruction of severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: A 5-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:466-475.
17. Bahat O. Brånemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: Clinical study of 660 implants folowed for 5 to 12 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:646-653.
18. Regev E, Smith RA, Perrot DH, Pogrel MA. Maxillary sinus complications related to endosseous implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:451-461.
19. Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol 2004;75:511-516.
20. Coatam GW, Krieger JT. A four-year study examining the results of indirect sinus augmentation procedures. J Oral Implantol 1997;23:117-127.
21. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:8-17.
22. Deporter D, Todescan R, Caudry S. Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porous-surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:476-485.
23. Cosci F, Luccioli M. A new sinus lift technique in conjunction with placement of 265 implants: a 6-year retrospective study. Implant Dent 2000;9:363-368.
24. Felice P, Checchi V, Pistilli R, Scarano A, Pellegrino G, Esposito M. Bone augmentation versus 5-mm dental implants in posterior atrophic jaws. Four-month post-loading results from a randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009;2:267-281.
25. Esposito M, Pellegrino G, Pistilli R, Felice P. Rehabilitation of posterior atrophic edentulous jaws: prostheses supported by 5 mm short implants or by longer implants in augmented bone? One-year results from a pilot randomised clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2011;4:21-30.
26. Cannizzaro G, Felice P, Leone M, Viola P, Esposito M. Early loading of hydroxyapatite coated implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: lateral sinus lift with autogenous bone and Bio-Oss versus crestal mini sinus lift and 8-mm hydroxyapatite-coated implants. A randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009;2:25-38.
27. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:35-51.
28. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM, Chipman ML, Valiquette N. A histological comparison in the dog of porous-coated vs. threaded dental implants. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1138-1145.
29. Deporter DA, Todescan R, Watson PA, Pharoah M, Pilliar RM, Tomlinson GA. A prospective human clinical trial of Endopore dental implants in restoring the partially edentulous maxilla using fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:527-536.
30. Deporter DA, Watson P, Pharoah M, Todescan R, Tomlinson G. Ten-year results of prospective study using porous-surfaced dental implants and a mandibular overdenture. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:183-189.
31. Pilliar RM. Overview of surface variability of metallic endosseous dental implants: Textured and porous surface-structured designs. Implant Dent 1998;7:305-314.
32. Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999;70:1523-1539.
33. Pilliar RM, Simmons CA. Mechanical factors and osseointegration: Influence of implant design. In: Zarb GA (ed). Osteoporosis and dental implants. Chicago: Quintessence, 2001:35-44.
34. Oyonarte R, Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Woodside DG. Peri-implant bone response to orthodontic loading: Part 2. Implant surface geometry and its effect on regional bone remodeling. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:182-189.
35. Pilliar RM, Sagals G, Meguid SA, Oyonoarte R, Deporter DA. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: Three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:879-889.
36. Vaillancourt H, Pilliar RM, McCammond D. Factors affecting crestal bone loss with dental implants partially covered with a porous coating: A finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:351-359.
37. Hagi D, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, Arenovich T. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< or = 7mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol 2004;75:798-804.
38. Felice P, Cannizzaro G, Checchi V, Pellegrino G, Censi P, Esposito M. Vertical bone augmentation versus 7-mm-long dental implants in posterior atrophic mandibles. Results of a randomised controlled clinical trial of up to 4 months after loading. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009;2:7-20.
39. Felice P, Pellegrino G, Checchi L, Pistilli R, Esposito M. Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7 mm-long implants in posterior mandibles: 1-year results of a randomised clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:1934-1943.
40. Felice P, Soardi E, Pellegrino G, Pistilli R, Marchetti C, Gessaroli M, Esposito M. Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants. Five-month post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2011;4:191-202.
41. Checchi L, Felice P, Soardi E, Cosci F, Pellegrino G, Esposito M. Crestal sinus lift for implant rehabilitation: a randomised clinical trial comparing the Cosci and the Summers techniques. A preliminary report on complications and patient preference. Eur J Oral Implantol 2010;3:221-232.
42. Emmerich D, Att W, Stappert C. Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2005;76:1237-1251.