Crestal sinus lift for implant rehabilitation: A randomised clinical trial comparing the Cosci and the Summers techniques. A preliminary report on complications and patient preference

European Journal of Oral Implantology

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 221-232

  Checchi, Luigi ^a   Felice, Pietro ^a   Antonini, Elisa Soardi ^a   Cosci, Ferdinando ^b   Pellegrino, Gerardo ^a   Esposito, Marco ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b Private Practice   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone augmentation; Crestal sinus lift; Patient morbidity; Patient preference; Surgical techniques

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEADACHE; HUMAN; MALE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL SURGERY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TIME; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, TEMPORARY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEADACHE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78049420870     PISSN: 17562406     EISSN: 17562414     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-616
2. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:328-343
3. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:565-577
4. Brånemark PI, Gröndahl K, öhrnell LO, Nilsson P, Petruson B, Svensson B, Engstrand P, Nannmark U. Zygoma fixture in the management of advanced atrophy of the maxilla: technique and long-term results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2004;38:70-85
5. Esposito M, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the severely deficient edentulous maxilla. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;4:CD004151
6. Tatum HJ. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:207-229
7. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1994;15:152-158
8. Emmerich D, Att W, Stappert C. Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2005;76:1237-1251
9. Cosci F, Luccioli M. A new sinus lift technique in conjunction with placement of 265 implants: a 6-year retrospective study. Implant Dent 2000;9:363-368
10. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Rees J, Karasoulos D, Felice P, Alissa R, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;3:CD008397
11. Cannizzaro G, Felice P, Leone M, Viola P, Esposito M. Early loading of implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: lateral sinus lift with autogenous bone and Bio-Oss versus crestal mini sinus lift and 8-mm hydroxyapatite-coated implants. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009;2:25-38