Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: Three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 879-889

  Pilliar, Robert M ^a,b   Sagals, Genadijs ^b   Meguid, Shaker A ^b   Oyonarte, Rodrigo ^c   Deporter, Douglas A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Chile)

Author keywords

Crestal bone loss; Finite element analysis; Implant surfaces

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BONE REGENERATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOG; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; MANDIBLE; MECHANICAL STRESS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; OSTEOLYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POROSITY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANIMALS; BICUSPID; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DOGS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MANDIBLE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE PROCEDURES; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; POROSITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33846331705     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Goodacre O, Brown DT, Roberts WE, Jeiroudi MT. Prosthodontic considerations when using implants for orthodontic anchorage. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:162-170.
2. Henry PJ, Singer S. Implant anchorage for the occlusal management of developmental defects in children: A preliminary report. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1999;11:699-706.
3. Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:763-767.
4. Kyung SH, Hong SG, Park YC. Distalization of maxillary molars with a midpalatal miniscrew. J Clin Orthod 2003;37:22-26.
5. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Ziberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod 1984;86:95-111.
6. Akin-Nerzig N, Nergiz I, Schulz A, Arpak N, Niedermeie W. Reactions of peri-implant tissues to continuous loading of osseointegrated implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:292-298.
7. Majzoub Z, Finotti M. Miotti F, Giardino R, Aldini NN, Cordioli G. Bone response to orthodontic loading of endosseous implants in the rabbit calvaria: Early continuous distalizing forces. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:223-230.
8. Wehrbein H, Glatzmaier J, Yildrim M. Orthodontic anchorage capacity of short titanium screw implants in the maxilla. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:131-141.
9. Cheng S-J, Tseng I-Y, Lee J-J, Kok S-H. A prospective study of risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:100-106.
10. Pilliar RM. Overview of surface variability of metallic endosseous dental implants: Textured and porous-surfaced designs. Implant Dent 1998;7:305-314.
11. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pharoah M, Todescan R, Tomlinson G. Ten-year results of a prospective study using porous-surfaced dental implants and a mandibularoverdenture. Clin Implants Dent Relat Res 2002;4:183-189.
12. Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, Todescan R, Watson PA, Pharoah M. Managing the posterior mandible of partially edentulous patients with short, porous-surfaced dental implants: Early data from a clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:653-658.
13. Hagi D, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, Arenovich T. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (7 mm or less) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol 2004;75:796-802.
14. Deporter DA, Todescan R, Watson PA, Pharoah M, Pilliar RM, Jomlinson G. A prospective human clinical trial of Endopore dental implants in restoring partially edentulous maxilla using fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:527-536.
15. Pilliar RM. Processing and properties of endosseous dental implant surfaces: Design for increased osseointegration potential. Oral Health 2000;(August):51-58.
16. Dziedic DM. Effects of Implant Surface Topography on Osteoconduction [thesis]. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1994.
17. Simmons CA, Valiquette N, Pilliar RM. Osseointegration of sintered porous-surfaced and plasma-spray coated implants: An animal model study of early post-implantation healing response and mechanical stability. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;47:127-138.
18. Carter DR, Beaupre GS, Giori NJ, Helms JA. Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clin Orthop 1998;355(suppl):S41-S45.
19. Simmons CA, Meguid SA, Pilliar RM. Mechanical regulation of localized and appositional bone formation around bone-interfacing implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;55:63-71.
20. Oyonarte R, Deporter D, Pilliar RM, Woodside DG. Peri-implant bone response to orthodontic loading: Part 1. The effects of implant surface design, a histomorphometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:173-181.
21. Oyonarte R, Deporter D, Pilliar RM, Woodside DG. Peri-implant bone response to orthodontic loading: Part 2. Implant surface geometry and its impact on regional bone remodeling. Am J Orthod Dentofacia Orthop, 2005;128;182-189.
22. Van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander Sloten J, Van der Perre G, Naert I. Peri-implant bone tissue strains in cases of dehiscence: A finite element study. CMn Oral Implants Res 2002;13:327-333.
23. ANSYS Structural Analysis Guide, Version 5.6 and higher, ANSYS Online Help, SAS [unpublished work, 2003]. Available at: http://www.oulu.fi/atkk/ tkpalv/unix/ansys6.1/content/index.html
24. ANSYS User's Manual, ver. 5.6-8.0. Cary, NC: SAS, 2000-2004.
25. Dammak M, Shirazi-Adl M, Schwartz Jr M, Gustavson L. Friction properties at the bone-metal interface: Comparison of four different porous metal surfaces. J Biomechanics 1997;35:329-336.
26. Vaillancourt H, Pilliar RM, McCammond D. Finite element analysis of crestal bone loss around porous-coated dental implants. J Appl Biomater 1995;6:267-282.
27. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA, et al. The effect of partial coating with hydroxyapatite on bone remodeling in relation to porous-coated titanium-alloy dental implants in the dog. J Dent Res 1991;70:1338-1345.
28. Al-Sayyed A, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, et al. Predictable crestal bone remodelling around two porous-coated titanium alloy dental implant designs. A radiographic study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:131-141.
29. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The periimplant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:212-219.
30. Roberts WE. Fundamental principles of bone physiology, metabolism and loading. In: Naert I, van Steenberghe D, Worthington P (eds). Osseointegration in Oral Rehabilitation: An Introductory Textbook. London: Quintessence, 1993:157-180.
31. Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:527-536.