Access Patterns of Online Materials in a Blended Course

Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 107-123

  Asarta, Carlos J ^a   Schmidt, James R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Blended Courses; Business Statistics; Online Accesses; Student Performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871673781     PISSN: 15404595     EISSN: 15404609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2012.00366.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Arbaugh, J., Godfrey, M., Johnson, M., Pollack, B., Niendorf, B., & Wresch, W. (2009). Research in online and blended learning in the business disciplines: Key findings and possible future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 12(2), 71-87.
2. Baugher, D., Varanelli, A., & Weisbord, E. (2003). Student hits in an internet-supported course: How can instructors use them and what do they mean? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 1(2), 159-179.
3. Biktimirov, E., & Klassen, K. (2008). Relationship between use of online support materials and student performance in an introductory finance course. Journal of Education for Business, 83(3), 153-158.
4. Brown, B., & Liedholm, C. E. (2002). Can web courses replace the classroom in principles of microeconomics? American Economic Review, 92(2), 444-448.
5. Chong, S. (1998). Models of asynchronous computer conferencing for collaborative learning in large college classes. In C. Bonk & K. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship and discourse (pp. 157-182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Crouch, M. (2001). Using the internet to facilitate student learning in a large therapeutics course: A three-year perspective. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 65(1), 7-13.
7. Donnon, T., Violato, C., & DesCoteaus, J. (2006). Engagement with online curriculum materials and the course test performance of medical students. In Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia. IEEE Computer Society.
8. Dunlap, J., & Lowenthal, P. (2009). Tweeting the night away: Using twitter to enhance social presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 129-135.
9. Garrison, D., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
10. Gratton-Lavoie, C., & Stanley, D. (2009). Teaching and learning principles of microeconomics online: An empirical assessment. Journal of Economic Education, 40(1), 3-25.
11. Healy, D., Fleming, F., Gilhooley, D., Felle, P., Wood, A., Gorey, T., McDermott, E., Fitzpatrick, J., O'Higgins, N., & Hill, A. (2005). Electronic learning can facilitate student performance in undergraduate surgical education: A prospective observational study. BMC Medical Education, 5(23), 1-8.
12. Hwang, A., & Arbaugh, J. (2006). Virtual and traditional feedback-seeking behaviors: Underlying competitive attitudes and consequent grade performance. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 1-28.
13. Hwang, A., & Arbaugh, J. (2009). Seeking feedback in blended learning: Competitive versus cooperative student attitudes and their links to learning outcome. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(3), 280-293.
14. Johnson, G. (2005). Student alienation, academic achievement, and WebCT use. Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 179-189.
15. Johnson, M., & Kuennen, E. (2006). Basic math skills and performance in an introductory statistics course. Journal of Statistics Education, 14(2). Retrieved on September 8, 2011, from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v14n2/johnson.html.
16. Klein, H., Noe, R., & Wang, C. (2006). Motivation to learn and course outcomes: The impact of delivery mode, learning goal orientation, and perceived barriers and enablers. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 665-702.
17. Navarro, P., & Shoemaker, J. (2000). Performance and perceptions of distance learners in cyberspace. The American Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 15-35.
18. Palocsay, S., & Stevens, S. (2008). A study of the effectiveness of web-based homework in teaching undergraduate business statistics. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(2), 213-232.
19. Parsad, B., Lewis, L., & Tice, P. (2008). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006-07. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.
20. Picciano, A. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40.
21. Wang, A., & Newlin, M. (2000). Characteristics of students who enroll and succeed in psychology web-based classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 137-143.
22. Wells, P., de Lange, P., & Fieger, P. (2008). Integrating a virtual learning environment into a second-year accounting course: Determinants of overall student perception. Accounting and Finance, 48(3), 503-518.
23. Wilson, A. (2003). Evidence of effectiveness of course management software and asynchronous communication in a first finance course. Journal of Financial Education, 29(Fall), 40-54.