Relationship Between Use of Online Support Materials and Student Performance in an Introductory Finance Course

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 153-158

  Biktimirov, Ernest N ^a   Klassen, Kenneth J ^a  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

course Web site; finance; hits; homework; student performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959597651     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.83.3.153-158     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Anstine, J., & Skidmore, M. (2005). A small sample study of traditional and online courses with sample selection adjustment. Journal of Economic Education, 36, 107-128.
2. Bartsch, R. A., & Cobern, K. M. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers & Education, 41, 77-86.
3. Baugher, D., Varanelli, A., & Weisbord, E. (2003). Student hits in an internet-supported course: How can instructors use them and what do they mean? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 1, 159-179.
4. Chan, K. C., & Shum, C. (2004). An empirical analysis of a cumulative/rework testing strategy: Its effect on student performance in principles of finance. Journal of Financial Education, 30(Winter), 16-31.
5. Cudd, M., Tanner, J., & Lipscomb, T. (2004). A profile of classroom technology usage in finance instruction. Journal of Financial Education, 30(Spring), 28-40.
6. DenBeste, M. (2003). Power Point, technology and the Web: More than just an overhead projector for the new century? History Teacher, 36, 491-504.
7. Didia, D., & Hasnat, B. (1998). The determinants of performance in the university introductory finance course. Financial Practice and Education, 8, 102-107.
8. Farooqi, N., & Saunders, K. T. (2004). Teaching methods and assessment techniques for the undergraduate finance course: A Canadian survey. Advances in Financial Education, 2(Spring), 52-56.
9. Krishnan, V. S., Bathala, C. T., Bhattacharya, T. K., & Ritchey, R. (1999). Teaching the introductory finance course: What can we learn from student perceptions and expectations? Financial Practice and Education, 9, 70-82.
10. Lefcort, H., & Eiger, S. M. (2003). Preparatory versus practice homework. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(1), 16-18.
11. Lowry, R. B. (1999). Electronic presentation of lectures: Effect upon student performance. University Chemistry Education, 3(1), 18-21.
12. Peters, M., Kethley, B., & Bullington, K. (2002). The relationship between homework and performance in an introductory operations management course. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 340-344.
13. Rankin, E. L., & Hoaas, D. J. (2001). Teaching note: Does the use of computer-generated slide presentations in the classroom affect student performance and interest? Eastern Economic Journal, 27, 355-366.
14. Rayburn, L. G., & Rayburn, J. M. (1999). Impact of course length and homework assignments on student performance. Journal of Education for Business, 74, 325-331.
15. Saunders, K. T. (2001). Teaching methods and assessment techniques for the undergraduate introductory finance course: A national survey. Journal of Applied Finance, 11, 110-112.
16. Szabo, A., & Hastings, N. (2000). Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: Should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Computers & Education, 35, 175-187.
17. Van Ness, B. F., Van Ness, R. A., & Adkins, R. L. (2000). Student performance in principles of finance: Differences between traditional and internet settings. Financial Practice and Education, 10, 160-166.
18. Wilson, A. H. (2003). Evidence of the effectiveness of course management software and asynchronous communication in a first finance course. Journal of Financial Education, 29(Fall), 40-54.