Phenotypic diversity of traditional cherry accessions present in the Tuscan region

Scientia Horticulturae

Volumn 150, Issue , 2013, Pages 334-347

  Petruccelli, Raffaella ^a   Ganino, Tommaso ^b   Chiaccheri, Leonardo ^c   Maselli, Fabio ^d   Mariotti, Pierluigi ^a  

^a CNR IVALSA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

^c IFAC CNR   (Italy)

^d INSTITUTE OF BIOMETEOROLOGY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Germplasm; Morphological characterization; Multivariate analysis; Prunus avium L.

Indexed keywords

AGRONOMY; BIODIVERSITY; CULTIVAR; FRUIT; GERMPLASM; MORPHOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PLANTATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ITALY; TUSCANY;

PRUNUS AVIUM;

EID: 84871668611     PISSN: 03044238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.11.034     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Acosta-Quezada P.G., Martinez-Laborde J.B., Prohens J. Variation among tree tomato (Solanum betaceum Cav.) accessions from different cultivars groups: implications for conservation of genetic resources and breeding. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2011, 58:943-960.
2. Antonius K., Aaltonen M., Uosukainen M., Hurme T. Genotypic and phenotypic diversity in Finnish cultivated sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2011, 59:375-388.
3. Baldini E. Contributo allo studio delle cultivar di ciliegio della Provincia di Firenze. Descrizione delle cultivar. Rivista Ortoflorofrutticoltura Italiana 1955, 5/6:233-262.
4. Bargioni G., Bassi G. Ciliegie senza peduncolo perché non riscoprirle?. L'Inf. Agrario 2007, 26:55-57.
5. Basso M. Ciliegie. Agrumi, Frutta e Uve nella Firenze di Bartolomeo Bimbi Pittore Mediceo 1982, 57-70. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Roma. E. Baldini, E. Bellini, P. Fiorino, P.L. Pisani, F. Scaramuzzi (Eds.).
6. Basso M., Bellini E., Bini G., Casini E., Magherini R., Natali S. Indagine Sulle Cultivar di Ciliegio Diffuse in Italia 1973, Università di Bologna, Pisa, Firenze (Italy), pp. 85-138.
7. Basso M., Natali S. Contributo allo studio delle cultivar di ciliegio della provincia di Pisa. Rivista Ortoflorofrutticoltura Italiana 1959, 11/12:508-540.
8. Bellini E., Giordani E., Giannelli G., Picardi E. Cherry. The Fruit Woody Species Descriptor List 2007, 177-201.
9. Brown S.K., Iezzoni A.F., Fogle H.W. Cherries. Fruit Breeding, Tree and Tropical Fruits 1996, vol. I:213-255. John Wiley & Sons Inc., NY.
10. Cantín C.M., Gogorcena Y., Moreno M.á. Phenotypic diversity and relationships of fruit quality traits in peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] breeding progenies. Euphityca 2010, 171:211-226.
11. Christenses J.V. Numerical studies of morphological distinction marks in sweet cherry cultivars, identification key for 34 cultivars. Tidsskr. Planteavl. 1970, 74:44-74.
12. Cordeiro-Rodrigues L., Remedios Morales M., Bartolo Fernandes A.J., Ortiz J.M. Morphological characterization of sweet and sour cherry cultivars in a germplasm bank at Portugal. Genet. Resuor. Crop Evol. 2008, 55:593-601.
13. Davarynejad G.H., Nyéki J., Sbazò T., Totnyai J., Soltéz M., Aryanpooya Z., Szabò Z. First evaluation of fruit quality of some new and old sour cherry cultivars in Hungarian climatic condition. Intern. J. Hortic. Sci. 2009, 15:37-43.
14. Day Rubestein K., Smale M., Widrlechner M.P. Demand for genetic resources and the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System. Crop Sci. 2006, 46:1021-1031.
15. Del Riccio, A., 1595. Trattato di Agricoltura. MS (manuscripts). Biblioteca Botanica, Università di Firenze.
16. Demirsoy H., Demirsoy L. A study on the relationships between some fruit characteristics in cherries. Fruits 2004, 59:219-223.
17. Esquinas-Alcázar J. Protecting crop genetic diversity for food security: political, ethical and technical challenges. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6:946-953.
18. Esti M., Cinquanta L., Sinesio F., Moneta E., Di Matteo M. Physicochemical and sensory fruit characteristics of two sweet cherry cultivars after cool storage. Food Chem. 2002, 76:399-405.
19. Everitt B.S., Landau S., Leese M., Stahl D. Cluster analysis 2011, Book Series: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Son, Chichester, UK, ISBN: 9780470749913, doi:10.1002/9780470977811. 5th ed.
20. FAO Global Plan of Action for the Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture 1996, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. http://www.fao.org/.
21. Ferreira J.J., Garcia-González C., Tous J., Rovira M. Genetic diversity revealed by morphological traits and ISSR markers in hazelnut germplasm from northern Spain. Plant Breeding 2010, 129:435-441.
22. Furone-Pérez P., Fernández-López J. Morphological and phenological description of 38 sweet chestnut cultivars (Castanea sativa Miller) in a contemporary collection. Spanish J. Agric. Res. 2009, 7:829-843.
23. Génard M., Bruchou C. Multivariate analysis of within-tree factors accounting for the variation of peach fruit quality. Sci. Hort. 1992, 52:37-51.
24. Gonçalves B., Silva A.P., Moutinho-Pereira J., Bacelar E., Rosa E., Meyer S.A. Effect of ripeness and postharvest storage on the evolution of colour and anthocyanins in cherries (Prunus avium L.). Food Chem. 2007, 103:976-984.
25. Hammer K., Arrowsmith N., Gladis T. Agrobiodiversity with emphasis on plant genetic resources. Naturwissenschften 2003, 90:241-250.
26. Hjalmarsson I., Ortiz R. In situ and ex situ assessment of morphological and fruit variation in Scandinavian sweet cherry. Sci. Hort. 2000, 85:37-49.
27. Iezzoni A.F., Pritts M.P. Application of principal component analysis to horticultural research. HortScience 1991, 26:334-338.
28. IBPGR Cherry. Descriptor List 1985, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.
29. Lacis G., Trajkovski V., Rashal I. Phenotypical variability and genetic diversity within accessions of the Swedish sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) genetic resources collection. Biologija 2010, 56:1-8.
30. Jackson L.E., Pascual U., Hodgkin T. Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 121:196-210.
31. Jain S.K., Qualset C.O., Bhatt G.M., Wu K.K. Geographical patterns of phenotypic diversity in world collection of durum wheat. Crop Sci. 1975, 15:700-704.
32. Kappel F., Fisher-Fleming B., Hogue E. Fruit characteristics and sensory attributes of an ideal sweet cherry. HortScience 1996, 31:443-446.
33. Khadivi-Khub A., Zamani Z., Fatahi M.R. Multivariate analysis of Prunus subgen. Cerasus germplasm in Iran using morphological variables. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2011, 59:909-926.
34. Mac Key J. A plant breeder's aspect on the taxonomy of cultivate plants. Biol. Zentrablatt 1988, 107:369-379.
35. Micheli, P.A., 1679-1737. Lista di tutte le frutta che giorno per giorno dentro all'anno sono poste alla mensa dell'A. Re del Ser.mo Gran Duca di Toscana. MS (manuscripts). Biblioteca Botanica, Università di Firenze.
36. Milatović D., Nikolić D., Durović D. Variability, heritability and correlations of some factors affecting productivity in peach. Hort. Sci. (Prague) 2010, 7:79-87.
37. Mohammadi S.A., Prasanna B.M. Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants-salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Sci. 2003, 43:1235-1248.
38. Naderiboldaji M., Khadivi Khub A., Tabatabaeefar A., Ghasemi Varnamkhasti M., Zamani Z. Some physical properties of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruit. American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2008, 3:513-520.
39. Negri V. Agro-biodiversity conservation in Europe: ethical issues. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2005, 18(1):1-23.
40. Nikolić D., Rakonjać V., Milatović D., Fotirić M. Multivariate analysis of vineyard peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.] germplasm collection. Euphytica 2010, 171:227-234.
41. Norman P.E., Tongoona P., Shanahan P.E. Determination of interrelationships among agr-morphological traits of yams (Discorea spp.) using correrlation and factor analyses. J. Appl. Biosci. 2011, 45:3059-3070.
42. Odong T.I., van Heerwaarden J., Jansen J., van Hintum T.J.L., van Ecuwijk F.A. Determination of genetic structure of germplasm collections: are traditional hierarchical clustering methods appropriate for molecular marker data?. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 123:195-205.
43. Oliveira E.J., Dias N.L.P., Dantas J.L.L. Selection of morpho-agronomic descriptors for characterization of papaya cultivars. Euphitica 2012, 185:253-265.
44. Pascual U., Perrings C. Developing incentives and economic mechanisms for in situ biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 121:256-268.
45. Pereira-Lorenzo S., Ferreira Dos Santos A.R., Ramos-Cabrer A.M., Sau F., Díaz-Hernández M.B. Morphological variation in local pears from north-western Spain. Sci. Hort. 2012, 138:176-182.
46. Pérez-Sánchez R., Gòmez-Sànchez M.A., Morales-Corts M.R. Descriptorn and quality evaluation of sweet cherry cultured in Spain. J. Food Quality 2010, 33:490-506.
47. Pérez-Sánchez R., Gómez-Sánchez M.A., Morales-Corts M.R. Agromorphological characterization of traditional Spanish sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.), sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) and duke cherry (Prunus×gondouinii Rehd.) cultivars. Spanish J. Agric. Res. 2008, 6:42-55.
48. Pérez-Sánchez R., Gómez-Sánchez M.A., Morales-Corts M.R. Description and quality evaluation of sweet cherries cultured in Spain. J. Food Quality 2010, 33:490-506.
49. Podgornik M., Vuk I., Vrhovnik I., Mavsar D.B. A survey and morphological evaluation of fig (Ficus carica L.) genetic resources from Slovenia. Sci. Hort. 2010, 125:380-389.
50. Porceddu E., Damania A.B. Sampling variation in genetic resources of seed crops: a review. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 1992, 39:39-49.
51. Qualset C.O., McGuire P.E., Warburton M.L. Agrobiodiversity key to agricultural productivity. Calif. Agric. 1995, 49:45-49.
52. Rakonjac V., Fotirić AkŠić M., Milatović D., Nikolić D., čolić S. Morphological characterization of 'Oblačinska' sour cherry by multivariate analysis. Sci. Hort. 2010, 125:679-684.
53. Ruiz D., Egea J. Phenotypic diversity and relationships of fruit quality traits in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) germplasm. Euphytica 2008, 163:143-158.
54. Sapra R.L., Narain P., Chauhan S.V.S. A general model for sample size determination for collecting germplasm. J. Biosci. 1998, 23:647-652.
55. Sansavini S., Watkins R. Conservazione ed uso del germoplasma nella coltivazione del melo. Frutticoltura 1991, 1:45-55.
56. Shahi-Gharahlar A., Zamani Z., Fatahi M.R., Bonzari N. Assessment of morphological variation betwwen some Cerasus genotypes. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol. 2010, 51:308-318.
57. Shannon C.E., Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication 1949, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
58. Skinner D.Z., Bauchan G.R., Auricht G., Hughes S. A methods for the efficient management and utilization of large germplasm collection. Crop Sci. 1999, 39:1237-1242.
59. Swift M.J., Izac A.M.N., van Noordwijk M. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes-are we asking the right questions?. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2004, 104:113-124.
60. Thrupp L.A. Linking agricultural biodiversity and food security: the valuable role of agrobiodiversity for sustainable agriculture. Int. Aff. 2000, 76:265-281.
61. Trentacoste E., Puertas C. Preliminary characterization and morpho-agronomic evaluation of the olive germplasm collection of the Mendoza province (Argentina). Euphitica 2011, 177:99-109.
62. Upadhyaya H.D., Dwivedi S.L., Baum M., Varshney R.K., Udupa S.M., Gowda C.L.L., Hoisington D., Singh S. Genetic structure, diversity and allelic richness in composite collection and reference set in in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8:106. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/8/106.
63. UPOV Guidelines for the Conduct of Test for Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability. Cherry. TG/35/7 2006, International Union for the protection of New Varieties of Plants, Geneva, Switzerland.
64. Vursavuş K., Kelebek H., Selli S. A study on some chemical and physic-mechanic proprieties of three sweet cherry varieties (Prunus avium L.) in Turkey. J. Food. Eng. 2006, 74:568-575.
65. Ward Jr.J.H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 1963, 48:236-244.
66. Zeven A.C. Landraces: a review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 1998, 104:127-139.