Quantifying the association between personality similarity and marital adjustment using profile correlations: A cautionary tale

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 97-106

  Humbad, Mikhila N ^a   Brent Donnellan, M ^a   Iacono, William G ^b   McGue, Matthew ^b   Alexandra Burt, S ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Marital adjustment; Personality traits; Profile correlation; Profile similarity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871667623     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: 10957251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Acitelli L.K., Kenny D.A., Weiner D. The importance of similarity and understanding of partners' marital ideals to relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships 2001, 8:167-185. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00034.x.
2. Blanton H., Jaccard J. Arbitrary metrics in psychology. American Psychologist 2006, 61:27-41. 10.1037/0003-066X.61.1.27.
3. Caughlin, J. P., Huston, T. L., & Houts, R. M. (2000). How does personality matter in marriage? An examination of trait anxiety, interpersonal negativity, and marital satisfaction. doi: doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.326.
4. Cohen J. Rc: A profile similarity coefficient invariant over variable reflection. Psychological Bulletin 1969, 71:281-284.
5. Corsini R. Understanding and similarity in marriage. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1956, 52:327-332.
6. Cronbach L.J., Gleser G.C. Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin 1953, 50:456-473. 10.1037/h0057173.
7. Donnellan M.B., Assad K.K., Robins R.W., Conger R.D. Do negative interactions mediate the effects of Negative Emotionality, Communal Positive Emotionality, and Constraint on relationship satisfaction?. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 2007, 24:557. 10.1177/0265407507079249.
8. Dyrenforth P.S., Kashy D.A., Donnellan M.B., Lucas R.E. Predicting relationship and life satisfaction in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects for personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2010, 99:690-702. 10.1037/a0020385.
9. Eysenck H.J., Wakefield J.A. Psychological factors as predictors of marital satisfaction. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy 1981, 3:151-192. 10.1016/0146-6402(81)90002-3.
10. Feingold A. Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1994, 116:429-456. 10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429.
11. Finkel E.J., Eastwick P.W., Karney B.R., Reis H.T., Sprecher S. Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2012, 13:3-66. 10.1177/1529100612436522.
12. Furr R.M. A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality 2008, 76:1267-1316. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00521.x.
13. Gattis K.S., Berns S., Simpson L.E., Christensen A. Birds of a feather or strange birds? Ties among personality dimensions, similarity, and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology 2004, 18:564-574. 10.1037/0893-3200.18.4.564.
14. Gonzaga G.C., Campos B., Bradbury T. Similarity, convergence, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 93:34-48. 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.34.
15. Gonzaga G.C., Carter S., Buckwalter J.G. Assortative mating, convergence, and satisfaction in married couples. Personal Relationships 2010, 17:634-644. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01309.x.
16. Graham J.M., Liu Y.J., Jeziorski J.L. The Dyadic Adjustment Scale: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family 2006, 68:701-717.
17. Heller D., Watson D., Ilies R. The role of person versus situation in life satisfaction: A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin 2004, 130:574-600. 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.574.
18. Humbad M.N., Donnellan M.B., Iacono W.G., Burt S.A. Marital quality is associated with externalizing personality and psychopathology: Results from a very large sample of married couples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2010, 119:151-162. 10.1037/a0017981.
19. Humbad M.N., Donnellan M.B., Iacono W.G., McGue M., Burt S.A. Is spousal similarity for personality a matter of convergence or selection?. Personality and Individual Differences 2010, 49:827-830. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.010.
20. Iacono W.G., Carlson S.R., Taylor J., Elkins I.J., McGue M. Behavioral disinhibition and the development of substance-use disorders: Findings from the Minnesota Twin Family Study. Development and Psychopathology 1999, 11:869-900. 10.1017/S0954579499002369.
21. Karney B.R., Bradbury T.N. The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin 1995, 118:3-34. 10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3.
22. Kelly E.L., Conley J.J. Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 52:27-40. 10.1037//0022-3514.52.1.27.
23. Kenny D.A., Acitelli L.K. Measuring similarity in couples. Journal of Family Psychology 1994, 8:417-431. 10.1037/0893-3200.8.4.417.
24. Kenny D.A., Acitelli L.K. Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 80:439-448. 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.439.
25. Kenny D.A., Cook W.L. Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships 1999, 6:433-448. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00202.x.
26. Kenny D.A., Kashy D.A., Cook W.L. Dyadic data analysis 2006, Guilford Press.
27. Keyes M.A., Malone S.M., Elkins I.J., Legrand L.N., McGue M., Iacono W.G. The enrichment study of the Minnesota twin family study: Increasing the yield of twin families at high risk for externalizing psychopathology. Twin Research and Human Genetics 2009, 12:489-501. 10.1375/twin.12.5.489.
28. Luo S., Chen H., Yue G., Zhang G., Zhaoyang R., Xu D. Predicting marital satisfaction from self, partner, and couple characteristics: Is it me, you, or us?. Journal of Personality 2008, 76:1231-1265. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00520.x.
29. Malouff J.M., Thorsteinsson E.B., Schutte N.S., Bhullar N., Rooke S.E. The Five-Factor Model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality 2010, 44:124-127. 16/j.jrp. 2009.09.004.
30. McCartney K., Rosenthal R. Effect size, practical importance, and social policy for children. Child Development 2000, 71:173-180. 10.1111/1467-8624.00131.
31. McCrae R.R. Agreement of personality profiles across observers. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1993, 28:25-40. 10.1207/s15327906mbr2801_2.
32. McCrae R.R. A note on some measures of profile agreement. Journal of Personality Assessment 2008, 90:105-109. 10.1080/00223890701845104.
33. McGue M., Keyes M., Sharma A., Elkins I., Legrand L., Johnson W., et al. The environments of adopted and non-adopted youth: Evidence on range restriction from the Sibling Interaction and Behavior Study (SIBS). Behavior Genetics 2007, 37:449-462. 10.1007/s10519-007-9142-7.
34. Montoya R.M., Horton R.S., Kirchner J. Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 2008, 25:889-922. 10.1177/0265407508096700.
35. Reich W. Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2000, 39:59-66. 10.1097/00004583-200001000-00017.
36. Robins R.W., Caspi A., Moffitt T.E. Two personalities, one relationship: Both partners' personality traits shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 79:251-259. 10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.251.
37. Schmitt D.P., Realo A., Voracek M., Allik J. Why can't a man be more like a women? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 94:168-182. 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168.
38. Simmons J., Nelson L., Simonsohn U. False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science 2011, 22:1359-1366.
39. Spanier G.B. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1976, 38:15-28. 10.2307/350547.
40. Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the multidimensional personality questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
41. Watson D., Hubbard B., Wiese D. General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self- and partner-ratings. Journal of Personality 2000, 68:413-449. 10.1111/1467-6494.00102.