Predicting Relationship and Life Satisfaction From Personality in Nationally Representative Samples From Three Countries: The Relative Importance of Actor, Partner, and Similarity Effects

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 690-702

  Dyrenforth, Portia S ^a   Kashy, Deborah A ^b   Donnellan, M Brent ^b   Lucas, Richard E ^b  

^a HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Big five; Dyadic data analysis; Life satisfaction; Relationship satisfaction; Similarity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; GERMANY; HAPPINESS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MARRIAGE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SATISFACTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPOUSE; UNITED KINGDOM;

AUSTRALIA; FEMALE; GERMANY; GREAT BRITAIN; HAPPINESS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MARRIAGE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PERSONALITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEX FACTORS; SPOUSES;

EID: 77957823268     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020385     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Acitelli L.K., Kenny D.A., Weiner D. The importance of similarity and understanding of relationship partners' beliefs about their ideal marriage. Personal Relationships 2001, 8:167-185. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00034.x.
2. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
3. Anderson C., Keltner D., John O.P. Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 84:1054-1068. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1054.
4. Barelds D.P.H. Self and partner personality in intimate relationships. European Journal of Personality 2005, 19:501-518. doi: 10.1002/per.549.
5. Blum J.S., Mehrabian A. Personality and temperament correlates of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality 1999, 67:93-125. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00049.
6. Botwin M.D., Buss D.M., Shackelford T.K. Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality 1997, 65:107-136. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.x.
7. Brauer M., Judd C.M. Defining variables in relationship to other variables: When interactions suddenly turn out to be main effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2000, 36:410-423. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1420.
8. Caspi A., Herbener E.S. Continuity and change: Assortative marriage and the consistency of personality in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 58:250-258. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.250.
9. Cooper M.L., Sheldon M.S. Seventy years of research on personality and close relationships: Substantive and methodological trends over time. Journal of Personality 2002, 70:783-812.
10. Cronbach L.J. Processes affecting scores on " understanding of others" and " assumed similiarity." Psychological Bulletin 1955, 52:177-193. doi: 10.1037/h0044919.
11. Cronbach L.J., Gleser G.C. Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin 1953, 50:456-473. doi: 10.1037/h0057173.
12. Diener E., Suh E.M., Lucas R.E., Smith H.L. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin 1999, 125:276-302. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.
13. Donnellan M.B., Assad K.K., Robins R.W., Conger R.D. Do negative interactions mediate the effects of negative emotionality, communal positive emotionality, and constraint on relationship satisfaction?. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 2007, 24:557-573. doi: 10.1177/0265407507079249.
14. Donnellan M.B., Lucas R.E. Age differences in the Big Five across the life span: Evidence from two national samples. Psychology and Aging 2008, 23:558-566. doi: 10.1037/a0012897.
15. Eysenck H.J., Wakefield J.A. Psychological factors as predictors of marital satisfaction. Advances in Behavioral Research and Therapy 1981, 3:151-192. doi: 10.1016/0146-6402(81)90002-3.
16. Furr R.M. Framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality 2008, 76:1267-1316. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00521.x.
17. Gattis K.S., Berns S., Simpson L.E., Christensen A. Birds of a feather or strange birds? Ties among personality dimensions, similarity, and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology 2004, 18:564-574. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.18.4.564.
18. Gaunt R. Couple similarity and marital satisfaction: Are similar spouses happier?. Journal of Personality 2006, 74:1401-1420. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00414.x.
19. German Socio-Economic Panel Study-2005 (Wave 2005) [Data file] 2008, German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), Author, Berlin, Germany.
20. Glicksohn J., Golan H. Personality, cognitive style and assortative mating. Personality and Individual Differences 2001, 30:1199-1209. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00103-3.
21. Gonzaga G.C., Campos B., Bradbury T. Similarity, convergence, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 93:34-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.34.
22. Griffin D., Murray S., Gonzalez R. Difference score correlations in relationship research: A conceptual primer. Personal Relationships 1999, 6:505-518. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00206.x.
23. Heller D., Watson D., Ilies R. The role of person versus situation in life satisfaction: A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin 2004, 130:574-600. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.574.
24. John O.P., Srivastava S. The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research 1999, 102-138. Guilford Press, New York, NY. 2nd ed. L.A. Pervin, O.P. John (Eds.).
25. Karney B.R., Bradbury T.N. The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin 1995, 118:3-34. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3.
26. Kelly E.L., Conley J.J. Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 52:27-40. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.27.
27. Kenny D.A., Acitelli L.K. Measuring similarity in couples. Journal of Family Psychology 1994, 8:417-431. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.8.4.417.
28. Kenny D.A., Kashy D.A., Cook W.L. Dyadic data analysis 2006, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
29. Kurdek L.A. Predicting marital dissolution: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study of newlywed couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 64:221-242. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.221.
30. Lucas R.E., Diener E. Personality and subjective well-being. Handbook of personality: Theory and research 2008, 795-814. Guilford Press, New York, NY. 4th ed. O.P. John, R.W. Robins, L.A. Pervin (Eds.).
31. Luo S., Chen H., Yue G., Zhang G., Zhaoyang R., Xu D. Predicting marital satisfaction from self, partner, and couple characteristics: Is it me, you, or us?. Journal of Personality 2008, 76:1231-1266. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00520.x.
32. Luo S., Klohnen E.C. Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88:304-326. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.304.
33. Malouff J.M., Thorsteinsson E.B., Schutte N.S., Bhullar N., Rooke S.E. The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality 2010, 44:124-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.004.
34. McCrae R.R. Agreement of personality profiles across observers. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1993, 28:25-40. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2801_2.
35. McCrae R.R. A note on some measures of profile agreement. Journal of Personality Assessment 2008, 90:105-109. doi: 10.1080/00223890701845104.
36. Murray S.L., Holmes J.G., Bellavia G., Griffin D.W., Dolderman D. Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:563-581. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.563.
37. Robins R.W., Caspi A., Moffitt T.E. Two personalities, one relationship: Both partners' personality traits shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 79:251-259. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.251.
38. Russell R.J., Wells P.A. Personality similarity and quality of marriage. Personality and Individual Differences 1991, 12:407-412. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(91)90057-I.
39. Saucier G. Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment 1994, 63:506-516.
40. Schimmack, U., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Environmental influences on well-being: A dyadic latent panel analysis of spousal similarity. Unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto.
41. Shiota M.N., Levenson R.W. Birds of a feather don't always fly farthest: Similarity in Big Five personality predicts more negative marital satisfaction trajectories in long-term marriages. Psychology and Aging 2007, 22:666-675. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.666.
42. Steel P., Schmidt J., Schultz J. Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin 2008, 134:138-161. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138.
43. Terman L.M., Buttenweiser P. Personality factors in marital compatibility. Journal of Social Psychology 1935, 6:143-171.
44. Institute for Social and Economic Research, British Household Panel Survey: Wave 15 [Data file] 2008, University of Essex, UK Data Archive [Distributor], Colchester, Essex.
45. Watson D., Hubbard B., Wiese D. General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self- and partner-ratings. Journal of Personality 2000, 68:413-449. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00102.
46. Watson D., Klohnen E.C., Casillas A., Simms E.N., Haig J., Berry D.S. Match makers and deal breakers: Analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. Journal of Personality 2004, 72:1029-1068. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00289.x.
47. Watson N. HILDA user manual-Release 5.0 2005, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
48. Zentner M.R. Ideal mate personality concepts and compatibility in close relationships: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 89:242-256. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.242.