Developing commitment for horizontal G2G integration: A stakeholder governance approach

Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Government, ECEG

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 131-140

  Flak, Leif Skiftenes ^a   Nordheim, Stig ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Action case; Dialectics; G2G; Horizontal integration; Municipal cooperation; Stakeholder theory

Indexed keywords

DIALECTICS; G2G; HORIZONTAL INTEGRATIONS; MUNICIPAL COOPERATION; STAKEHOLDER THEORY;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 84871661854     PISSN: 20491034     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Beynon-Davies, P. (2005) Constructing Electronic Government: The Case Of The Uk Inland Revenue. International Journal Of Information Management, 25, 3-20.
2. Boyne, G. A. (2002) Public And Private Management: What's The Difference? Journal Of Management Studies, 39, 97-122.
3. Bretschneider, S. (1990) Management-Information-Systems In Public And Private Organizations - An Empirical-Test. Public Administration Review, 50, 536-545.
4. Choudrie, J., Papazafeiropoulou, A. & Lee, H. (2003) Applying Stakeholder Theory To Analyse The Diffusion Of Broadband In South Korea: The Importance Of The Government s Role. In Ciborra Cu, M. R., De Marco M, Martinez M, Carignani A (Ed.) European Conference On Information Systems. Naples, Italy.
5. Contenti, M., Termini, A., Mecella, M. & Baldoni, R. (2003) An E-Service-Based Framework For Inter-Administration Cooperation. Knowledge Management In Electronic Government.
6. De, R. (2005) E-Government Systems In Developing Countries: Stakeholders And Conflict. In Traunmuller, R. (Ed.) International Conference On E-Government. Copenhagen, Denmark, Springer Verlag.
7. Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. E. (1995) The Stakeholder Theory Of The Corporation - Concepts, Evidence, And Implications. Academy Of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
8. Edmiston, K. D. (2003) State And Local E-Government - Prospects And Challenges. American Review Of Public Administration, 33, 20-45.
9. Flak, L. S. & Nordheim, S. (2006) Stakeholders, Contradictions And Salience: An Empirical Study Of A Norwegian G2g Effort. Hawaiian International Conference On System Sciences, Hicss. Kauai, Hawaii, Us, Ieee Computer Society.
10. Flak, L. S., Olsen, D. H. & Wolcott, P. (2005) Local E-Government In Norway: Current Status And Emerging Issues. Scandinavian Journal Of Information Systems, Forthcoming.
11. Flak, L. S. & Rose, J. (2005) Stakeholder Governance: Adapting Stakeholder Theory To The E-Government Field. Communications Of The Association For Information Systems, 16, 642 - 665.
12. Georgiadis, P., Lepouras, G., Vassilakis, C., Boukis, G., Tambouris, E., Gorilas, S., Davenport, E., Macintosh, A., Fraser, J. & Lochhead, D. (2002) Smartgov*: A Knowledge-Based Platform For Transactional Electronic Services. Electronic Government, Proceedings.
13. Grönlund, Å. (2004) State Of The Art In E-Gov Research - A Survey. In Traunmuller, R. (Ed.) Third International Conference On Electronic Government, Egov. Zaragoza, Spain, Springer Verlag.
14. Hood, C. (1991) A Public Management For All Seasons. Public Administration, 69, 3-19.
15. Hughes, J. & Wood-Harper, T. (1999) Systems Development As A Research Act. Journal Of Information Technology, 14, 83-94.
16. Joia, L. A. (2004) Developing Government-To-Government Enterprises In Brazil: A Heuristic Model Drawn From Multiple Case Studies. International Journal Of Information Management, 24, 147-166.
17. Klischewski, R. & Scholl, H. J. (2006) Information Quality As A Common Ground For Key Players In E-Government Integration And Interoperability. Hicss '06. 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences. Hawaii, Us, Ieee.
18. Layne, K. & Lee, J. W. (2001) Developing Fully Functional E-Government: A Four Stage Model. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 122-136.
19. Scholl, H. J. (2001) Applying Stakeholder Theory To E-Government: Benefits And Limits. 1st Ifip Conference On E-Commerce, E-Business And E-Government. Zurich, Switzerland.
20. Scholl, H. J. (2004) Electronic Government: Scope And Scale Of Process Change. Electronic Government, Proceedings.
21. Scholl, H. J. (2005) Involving Salient Stakeholders: Beyond The Technocratic View On Change. Action Research (Ar), 2, 281-308.
22. Sharifi, H. & Zarei, B. (2004) An Adaptive Approach For Implementing E-Government In Ir Iran. Journal Of Government Information, 30, 600-619.
23. Tan, C. W., Pan, S. L.& Lim, E. T. K. (2005) Managing Stakeholder Interests In E-Government Implementation: Lessons Learned From A Singapore E-Government Project. Journal Of Global Information Management, 13, 31-53.
24. Vidgen, R. & Braa, K. (1997) Balancing Interpretation And Intervention In Information Systems Research: The Action Case Approach. In Lee, A., Liebenau, J. & Degross, J. (Eds.) Ifip Wg8.2 International Conference On Information Systems And Qualitative Research. Philadelphia, Usa.