More enduring questions in cognitive is research

Journal of the Association for Information Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1000-1011

  Browne, Glenn J ^a   Parsons, Jeffrey ^b  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

Behavioral decision making; Biases; Categorization; Cognition; Conceptual modelling; Heuristics; Information requirements determination; Memory; Systems analysis Design

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKINGS; BIASES; CATEGORIZATION; COGNITION; CONCEPTUAL MODELLING; HEURISTICS; INFORMATION REQUIREMENT;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84871639106     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15369323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00318     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Allen, G., & Parsons, J. (2010). Is query reuse potentially harmful? Anchoring and adjustment in adapting existing database queries. Information Systems Research, 21, 56-77.
2. Appan, R., & Browne, G. J. (2010). Investigating retrieval-induced forgetting during information requirements determination. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(5), 250-275.
3. Appan, R., & Browne, G. J. (2012). The Impact of Analyst-Induced 'Misinformation' on the Requirements Elicitation Process. MIS Quarterly, 36, 85-106.
4. Arnott, D. (2006). Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: A design science approach. Information Systems Journal, 16, 55-78.
5. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence and J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 89-195). New York: Academic Press.
6. Bajaj, A., Batra, D., Hevner, A., Parsons, J., & Siau, K. (2005). Systems analysis and design: Should we be researching what we teach? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 478-493.
7. Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2009). Judgment in managerial decision making (7th Ed.). New York: Wiley & Sons.
8. Browne, G. J., & Pitts, M. G. (2004). Stopping rule use during information search in design problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 208-224.
9. Browne, G. J., Pitts, M. G., & Wetherbe, J. C. (2007). Cognitive stopping rules for terminating information search in online tasks. MIS Quarterly, 31, 89-104.
10. Browne, G. J., & Ramesh, V. (2002). Improving information requirements determination: A cognitive perspective. Information & Management, 39, 625-645.
11. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
12. Chakraborty, S., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2010). An exploration into the process of requirements elicitation: A grounded approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(4), 212-249.
13. Cowan, N. (1993). Activation, attention, and short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 21, 162-167.
14. Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. New York: Taylor & Francis.
15. Crowder, R. G., & Neath, I. (1991). The microscope metaphor in human memory. In W. E. Hockley and S. Lewandowski (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 11-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
16. Davern, M., Shaft, T., & Te'eni, D. (2012). Cognition matters: Enduring questions in cognitive IS research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(4), 273-314.
17. Davis, G.B. (1982). Strategies for information requirements determination. IBM Systems Journal, 21(1), 4-30.
18. Davidson, E. J. (2002). Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 329-358.
19. Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12(5), 391-396.
20. Gemino, A., & Wand, Y. (2003). Evaluating modeling techniques based on models of learning. Communications of the ACM, 46(10), 79-84.
21. Gemino, A., & Wand, Y. (2005). Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: Comparison of mandatory and optional properties. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 55, 301-326.
22. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Griffith, T. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1996). Cognitive elements in the implementation of new technology: Can less information provide more benefits? MIS Quarterly, 20(1), 99-110.
24. Healy, A. F., & McNamara, D. S. (1996). Verbal learning and memory: Does the modal model still work? Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 143-172.
25. Heng, C. -S., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. -K. (2003). Willingness to continue with software projects: Effects of feedback direction and optimism under high and low accountability conditions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4(4), 171-194.
26. Hitch, G. (2012). Working memory. In N. Braisby and A. Gellaty (Eds.), Cognitive psychology (pp. 266-297). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Jayanth, R., Jacob, V. S., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2011). Vendor and client interaction for requirements assessment in software development: implications for feedback process. Information Systems Research, 22(2), 289-305.
28. Jørgenson, M., Indahl, U., & Sjøberg, D. (2003). Software effort estimation by analogy and "regression toward the mean". Journal of Systems and Software, 68, 253-262.
29. Jun, H. E., Butler, B. S., & King, W. R. (2007). Team cognition: Development and evolution in software project teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(2), 261-292.
30. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Strous and Giroux.
31. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341-350.
32. Keil, M. (1995). Pulling the plug: Software project management and the problem of project escalation. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 421-447.
33. Keil, M., Mann, J., & Rai, A. (2000). Why software projects escalate: An empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 631-664.
34. Kendall, K. E., & Kendall, J. E. (2010). Systems analysis and design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35. Kim, H. -W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009). Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status quo bias perspective. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 567-582.
36. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Lim, L. -H., & Benbasat, I. (1997). The debiasing role of group support systems: An experimental investigation of the representativeness bias. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47(3), 453-471.
38. Lindsay, D. S. (1990). Misleading suggestions can impair eyewitnesses' ability to remember event details. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(6), 1077-1083.
39. MacLeod, M. D. (2002). Retrieval-induced forgetting in eyewitness memory: Forgetting as a consequence of remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 135-149.
40. Mähring, M., & Keil, M. (2008). Information technology project escalation: A process model. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 239-272.
41. Mayer, R. E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 43-64.
42. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
43. Montazemi, A. R., & Conrath, D. W. (1986). The use of cognitive mapping for information requirements analysis. MIS Quarterly, 10(1), 45-56.
44. Moody, J. W., Blanton, J. E., & Cheney, P. W. (1998). A theoretically grounded approach to assist memory recall during information requirements determination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(1), 79-98.
45. Nickles, K. R., Curley, S. P., & Benson, P. G. (1996). Judgment-based and reason-based stopping rules in decision making under uncertainty (Working paper). Wake Forest University.
46. Parsons, J. (1996). An information model based on classification theory. Management Science, 42(10), 1437-1453.
47. Parsons, J. (2003). Effects of local versus global schema diagrams on verification and communication in conceptual data modeling. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(3), 155-183.
48. Parsons, J., & Saunders, C. (2004). Cognitive heuristics in software engineering: Applying and extending anchoring and adjustment to artifact reuse. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30(12), 873-888.
49. Parsons, J., & Wand, Y. (1997). Choosing classes in conceptual modeling. Communications of the ACM, 40(6), 63-69.
50. Parsons, J., & Wand, Y. (2000). Emancipating instances from the tyranny of classes in information modeling. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 25(2), 228-268.
51. Parsons, J., & Wand, Y. (2008a). A question of class. Nature, 23(455), 1040-1041.
52. Parsons, J., & Wand, Y. (2008b). Using cognitive principles to guide classification in information systems modeling. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 839-868.
53. Pitts, M. G., & Browne, G. J. (2007). Improving requirements elicitation: An empirical investigation of procedural prompts. Information Systems Journal, 17, 89-110.
54. Rehder, B., & Burnett, R. (2005). Feature inference and the causal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 264-314.
55. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 349-363.
57. Roy, M. C., & Lerch, F. J. (1996). Overcoming Ineffective mental representations in base-rate problems. Information Systems Research, 7(2), 233-247.
58. Rutherford, A., Markopoulos, G., Bruno, D., & Brady-Van den Bas, M. (2012). Long-term memory: Encoding to retrieval. In N. Braisby and A. Gellaty (Eds.), Cognitive psychology (pp. 229-265). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.
60. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Smith, E., & Medin, D.L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. Stacy, W., & MacMillan, J. (1995). Cognitive bias in software engineering. Communications of the ACM, 38, 57-63.
63. Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(1), 27-44.
64. Tan, W. -K., Tan, C. -H., & Teo, H. -H. (2012). Consumer-based decision aid that explains which to buy: Decision confirmation or overconfidence bias? Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 127-141.
65. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
66. Urquhart, C. (1997). Exploring analyst-client communication: Using grounded theory techniques to investigate interaction in informal requirements gathering. In A. S. Lee, J. Liebenau, & J. DeGross (Eds.), Information systems and qualitative research (pp. 149-181). London: Chapman and Hall.
67. Valacich, J. S., George, J., & Hoffer, J. A. (2011). Essentials of systems analysis and design (5th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
68. Wand, Y., & Weber, R. (1990). An ontological model of an information system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 16(11), 1282-1292.
69. West, R. (2008). The psychology of security. Communications of the ACM, 51(4), 34-40.
70. Xiao, B., & Benbasat, I. (2007). E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 137-209.