Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 575-591

  Colombani, C ^a   Legarra, A ^a   Fritz, S ^b   Guillaume, F ^c   Croiseau, P ^d   Ducrocq, V ^d   Robert Granie C ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b Union Nationale des Coopératives d'Elevage et d'Insémination Animale UNCEIA   (France)

^c Institut de l'Elevage   (France)

^d UMR1313 GÉNÉTIQUE ANIMALE ET BIOLOGIE INTÉGRATIVE   (France)

Author keywords

Bayesian method; Genomic selection; Holstein and Montb liarde breeds; Variable selection

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BREEDING; CATTLE; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; LACTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BREEDING; CATTLE; FEMALE; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; LACTATION; MALE; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE;

BOS;

EID: 84871617098     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-5225     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Boichard D., Manfredi E. Genetic analysis of conception rate in French Holstein cattle. Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci. 1994, 44:138-145.
2. Chun H., Keleş S. Expression quantitative trait loci mapping with multivariate sparse partial least squares regression. Genetics 2009, 182:79-90.
3. Cole J.B., VanRaden P.M., O'Connell J.R., Van Tassell C.P., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Wiggans G.R. Distribution and location of genetic effects for dairy traits. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:2931-2946.
4. Colombani C., Croiseau P., Fritz S., Guillaume F., Legarra A., Ducrocq V., Robert-Granié C. A comparison of partial least squares (PLS) and sparse PLS regressions in genomic selection in French dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:2120-2131.
5. Colombani, C., A. Legarra, P. Croiseau, F. Guillaume, S. Fritz, V. Ducrocq, and C. Robert-Granié. 2010. Application of PLS and sparse PLS regression in genomic selection. In 9th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Leipzig, Germany. Gesellschaft für Tierzuchtwissenschaften eV, Gießen, Germany.
6. Coster A., Bastiaansen J.W.M., Calus M.P.L., van Arendonk J.A.M., Bovenhuis H. Sensitivity of methods for estimating breeding values using genetic markers to the number of QTL and distribution of QTL variance. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2010, 42:9.
7. Croiseau P., Legarra A., Guillaume F., Fritz S., Baur A., Colombani C., Robert-Granié C., Boichard D., Ducrocq V. Fine tuning genomic evaluations in dairy cattle through SNP preselection with the elastic-net algorithm. Genet. Res. (Camb.) 2011, 93:409-417.
8. de los Campos G., Naya H., Gianola D., Crossa J., Legarra A., Manfredi E., Weigel K., Cotes J.M. Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. Genetics 2009, 182:375-385.
9. Druet T., Georges M. A hidden Markov model combining linkage and linkage disequilibrium information for haplotype reconstruction and quantitative trait locus fine mapping. Genetics 2010, 184:789-798.
10. Duchemin S.I., Colombani C., Legarra A., Baloche G., Larroque H., Astruc J.-M., Barillet F., Robert-Granié C., Manfredi E. Genomic selection in the French Lacaune dairy sheep breed. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:2723-2733.
11. Gianola D., de los Campos G., Hill W.G., Manfredi E., Fernando R. Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Genetics 2009, 183:347-363.
12. Gredler, B., K. G. Nirea, T. R. Solberg, C. Egger-Danner, T. H. E. Meuwissen, and J. Sölkner. 2009. Genomic selection in Fleckvieh/Simmental-First results. In Proc. Interbull Mtg., Barcelona, Spain. Interbull Centre, Dept. Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agriculture Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.
13. Grisart B., Farnir F., Karim L., Cambisano N., Kim J.-J., Kvasz A., Mni M., Simon P., Frère J.-M., Coppieters W., Georges M. Genetic and functional confirmation of the causality of the DGAT1 K232A quantitative trait nucleotide in affecting milk yield and composition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:2398-2403.
14. Habier D., Fernando R.L., Dekkers J.C.M. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 2007, 177:2389-2397.
15. Habier D., Fernando R.L., Kizilkaya K., Garrick D.J. Extension of the Bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12:186.
16. Habier D., Tetens J., Seefried F.-R., Lichtner P., Thaller G. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2010, 42:5.
17. Harris, B. L., D. L. Johnson, and R. J. Spelman. 2009. Genomic selection in New Zealand and the implications for national genetic evaluation. Pages 325-330 in Identification, Breeding, Production, Health and Recording of Farm Animals. Proceedings of the 36th ICAR Biennial Session, Niagara Falls. International Committee for Animal Recording (ICAR), Rome, Italy.
18. Hayes, B. J. 2009. Genomic selection in the era of the $1000 genome sequence. In Proc. Symposium Statistical Genetics of Livestock for the Post-Genomic Era, Madison, WI. Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
19. Hayes B.J., Chamberlain A.J., Maceachern S., Savin K., McPartlan H., MacLeod I., Sethuraman L., Goddard M.E. A genome map of divergent artificial selection between Bos taurus dairy cattle and Bos taurus beef cattle. Anim. Genet. 2009, 40:176-184.
20. Kizilkaya K., Fernando R.L., Garrick D.J. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88:544-551.
21. Lê Cao K.-A., González I., Déjean S. integrOmics: An R package to unravel relationships between two omics datasets. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2855-2856.
22. Lê Cao K.-A., Rossouw D., Robert-Granié C., Besse P. A sparse PLS for variable selection when integrating omics data. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2008, 7:35.
23. Legarra A., Robert-Granié C., Croiseau P., Guillaume F., Fritz S. Improved Lasso for genomic selection. Genet. Res. (Camb.) 2011, 93:77-87.
24. Liu Z., Seefried F.R., Reinhardt F., Rensing S., Thaller G., Reents R. Impacts of both reference population size and inclusion of a residual polygenic effect on the accuracy of genomic prediction. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2011, 43:19.
25. Long N., Gianola D., Rosa J.M., Weigel K.A. Dimension reduction and variable selection for genomic selection: Application to predicting milk yield in Holsteins. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2011, 128:247-257.
26. Meuwissen T.H.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001, 157:1819-1829.
27. Mevik B.-H., Cederkvist H.R. Mean squared error of prediction (MSEP) estimates for principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR). J. Chemometr. 2004, 18:422-429.
28. Moser G., Tier B., Crump R., Khatkar M., Raadsma H. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2009, 41:56.
29. Mrode, R. A., T. Krzyzelewski, K. Moore, M. Winters, and M. Coffey. 2011. The implementation of genomic evaluations in the UK. In Proc. of Interbull meeting, Stavanger, Norway. Interbull Centre, Dept. Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agriculture Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.
30. Mrode R.A., Swanson G.J. Calculating cow and daughter yield deviations and partitioning of genetic evaluations under a random regression model. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2004, 86:253-260.
31. Ostersen T., Christensen O.F., Henryon M., Nielsen B., Su G., Madsen P. Deregressed EBV as the response variable yield more reliable genomic predictions than traditional EBV in purebred pigs. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2011, 43:38.
32. Patry C., Ducrocq V. Evidence of biases in genetic evaluations due to genomic preselection in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:1011-1020.
33. Robert-Granié C., Duchemin S., Larroque H., Baloche G., Barillet F., Moreno C., Legarra A., Manfredi E. A comparison of various methods for the computation of genomic breeding values in French Lacaune dairy sheep. Proc. Annual Meeting 2011, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
34. Shen H.P., Huang J.H.Z. Sparse principal component analysis via regularized low rank matrix approximation. J. Multivariate Anal. 2008, 99:1015-1034.
35. Solberg T.R., Sonesson A.K., Woolliams J.A., Meuwissen T.H.E. Reducing dimensionality for prediction of genome-wide breeding values. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2009, 41:29.
36. Sorensen D., Gianola D. Likelihood, Bayesian and MCMC Methods in Quantitative Genetics 2002, Springer, New York, NY.
37. Steiger J.H. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol. Bull. 1980, 87:245-251.
38. Sun X., Habier D., Fernando R.L., Garrick D.J., Dekkers J.C.M. Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2010 data using Bayesian methods. BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl. 3):S13.
39. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J. Royal Stat. Soc. B 1996, 58:267-288.
40. VanRaden P.M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:4414-4423.
41. VanRaden P.M., Van Tassell C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Schenkel F.S. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:16-24.
42. VanRaden P.M., Wiggans G.R. Derivation, calculation, and use of national animal model information. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74:2737-2746.
43. Van Sickle J. Analyzing correlations between stream and watershed attributes. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2003, 39:717-726.
44. Vitezica Z.G., Aguilar I., Misztal I., Legarra A. Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection. Genet. Res. (Camb.) 2011, 93:357-366.
45. Weigel K.A., de los Campos G., González-Recio O., Naya H., Wu X.L., Long N., Rosa G.J.M., Gianola D. Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:5248-5257.
46. Wold H. Estimation of principal components and related models by iterative least squares. Multivariate Analysis 1966, 391-420. Academic Press, New York, NY. P.R. Krishnaiah (Ed.).