Breast reconstruction: A review and rationale for patient selection

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 124, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 55-62

  Nahabedian, Maurice Y ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRCA1 PROTEIN; BRCA2 PROTEIN;

ADVANCED CANCER; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; BIOPROSTHESIS; BODY BUILD; BREAST AREOLA; BREAST CANCER; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; BREAST PROSTHESIS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMORBIDITY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DEEP INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR FLAP; EARLY CANCER; EXPECTATION; FAT NECROSIS; GENE MUTATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MASTECTOMY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MYOCUTANEOUS FLAP; NIPPLE; ONCOGENE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PERFORATOR FLAP; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TRANSVERSE RECTUS ABDOMINIS MUSCULOCUTANEOUS FLAP; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; PATIENT SELECTION; SURGICAL FLAPS;

EID: 84975247185     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818b8c23     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Bondurant S. Safety of silicone breast implants. Committee on the Safety of Silicone Breast Implants, Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C., 1999.
2. Langstein HN, Cheng MH, Singeltary S, et al. Breast cancer recurrence after immediate reconstruction: Patterns and significance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:712.
3. Slavin SA, Love SM, Goldwyn RM. Recurrent breast cancer following immediate reconstruction with myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:1191.
4. Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris TE, Momen B, Manson PN. Infectious complications following breast reconstructions with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:467.
5. Disa JJ, Ad-El DD, Cohen SM, Cordeiro PG, Hidalgo DA. The premature removal of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1662.
6. Rogers NE, Allen RJ. Radiation effects on breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:1919.
7. Foster RD, Hansen SL, Esserman L, et al. Safety of immediate TRAM breast reconstruction for patients with locally advanced disease. Arch Surg. 2005;140:196.
8. Newman LA, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK. Presentation, treatment, and outcome of local recurrence after skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:571.
9. Nahabedian MY, Momen B. The impact of breast reconstruction on the oncologic efficacy of radiation therapy: A retrospective analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:244.
10. Nahabedian MY, Momen B. Lower abdominal bulge after DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54:124.
11. Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pockaj BA, Gray RJ, Samson TD. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in overweight and obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:447.
12. Chang DW, Wang B, Robb G, et al. Effect of obesity of flap and donor site complications in free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1640.
13. Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN. Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: Patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:466.
14. Guerra AB, Metzinger S, Bidros R, et al. Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator (GAP) flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:118.
15. Nahabedian MY. Symmetrical breast reconstruction: Analysis of secondary procedures following reconstruction with implants and with autologous tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115:257.
16. Salzberg CA. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix graft (AlloDerm). Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57:1.
17. Breuing KH, Colwell AS. Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59:250.
18. Zienowicz RJ, Karacauglu E. Implant based breast reconstruction will allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;20:373.
19. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow- up of a randomized study comparing breast conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227.
20. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233.
21. Girotto JA, Schreiber J, Nahabedian MY. Breast reconstruction in the elderly: Preserving excellent quality of life. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:572.
22. Lipa J, Youssef AA, Kuerer HM, Robb GL, Chang DW. Breast reconstruction in older women: Advantages of autologous tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1110.
23. Metcalfe KA, Semple JL, Narod SA. Satisfaction with breast reconstruction in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: A descriptive study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:360.
24. Spear SL, Carter ME, Schwarz K. Prophylactic mastectomy: indications, options, and reconstructive alternatives. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:891.
25. Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris TN. Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: A critical appraisal of the nipple-areolar complex. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1083.
26. Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros A, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: Oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:704.
27. Schecter AK, Freeman MB, Giri D, Sabo E, Weinzweig J. Applicability of the nipple areola complex sparing mastectomy: A prediction model using mammography to estimate risk of nipple areolar complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:498.
28. Sense HA, Rutgers EJ, Lopes Cardozo M, Van Lanschot JJ. Nipple sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: A viable option? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:521.
29. Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Skin sparing mastectomy with preservation of the nipple areolar complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238:120.
30. Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Tsangaris T. Breast reconstruction with the muscle sparing (MS-2) free TRAM and the DIEP flap: Is there a difference? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:436.
31. Rosson GD, Williams CG, Fishman EK, Singh NK. 3D CT angiography of abdominal wall vascular perforators to plan DIEAP flaps. Microsurgery 2007;27:641.
32. Alonso-Burgos A, Bastarrika Garcia-Totor E, et al. Preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap reconstruction with multislice-CT angiography: imaging findings and initial experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:585.
33. Chang BW, Leuthke R, Berg WA, Hamper UM., Manson PN. Two-dimensional color Doppler imaging for precise preoperative mapping and size determination of TRAM flap perforators. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:197.