The simulation game: An analysis of interactions between students and simulated patients

Medical Education

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 49-58

  De la Croix, Anne ^a   Skelton, John ^b  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STANDARD; TEACHING; UNITED KINGDOM;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; ENGLAND; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PATIENT SIMULATION; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84871533785     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12064     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Stubbs M. Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press 1983.
2. Brown G, Yule G. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983.
3. University of Ghent. What is meant by discourse analysis?http://www.english.ugent.be/da. [Accessed 7 August 2012.]
4. Roberts C, Sarangi S. Theme orientated discourse analysis of medical encounters. Med Educ 2005;39;632-640.
5. Bellack AA, Kliebard HM, Hyman RT, Smith, Jr FLThe Language of the Classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press 1966.
6. Drew P, Heritage J. Analysing talk at work: an introduction. In: Drew P, Heritage J, eds. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992;3-65.
7. Maynard DW. Language, interaction, and social problems. Soc Probl 1988;35:311-34.
8. ten Have P. Talk and institution: a reconsideration of the 'asymmetry' of doctor-patient interaction. In: Boden D, Zimmerman DH, eds. Talk and Social Structure; Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Polity Press 1991;138-63.
9. Sarangi S, Roberts C. Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter 1999.
10. Ainsworth-Vaughn N. Claiming Power in Doctor-Patient Talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1998.
11. Roberts C, Wass V, Jones R, Sarangi S, Gillett A. A discourse analysis study of 'good' and 'poor' communication in an OSCE: a proposed new framework for teaching students. Med Educ 2003;37:192-201.
12. Seale C, Butler CC, Hutchby I, Kinnersley P, Rollnick S. Negotiating frame ambiguity: a study of simulated encounters in medical education. Commun Med 2007;4:177-187.
13. de la Croix A, Skelton J. The reality of role-play: interruptions and amount of talk in simulated consultations. Med Educ 2009;43:695-703.
14. Hanna M, Fins JJ. Power and communication; why simulation training ought to be complemented by experiential and humanist learning. Acad Med 2006;81:265-70.
15. Skelton JR, Hobbs FDR. Concordancing: exploring the uses of language-based research in medical education. Lancet 1999;353:108-11.
16. Linell P, Gustavsson L, Juvonen P. Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: a presentation of initiative-response analysis. Linguistics 1988;26:415-22.
17. Fairclough N. Language and Power, 2nd edn. London: Longman 2001.
18. Ng SH, Bradac JJ. Power in Language; Verbal Communication and Social Influence. Newbury Park, CA; London; New Delhi: Sage Publications 1993.
19. Woods N. Talking shop: sex and status as determinants of floor appointment in a work setting. In: Coates J, Cameron D, eds. Women in their Speech Communities. London; New York, NY: Longman 1988;141-57.
20. Itakura H. Conversational Dominance and Gender. A Study of Japanese Speakers in First and Second Language Contexts. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing 2001.
21. Diamond J. Status and Power in Verbal Interaction. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing 1996.
22. Okamoto DG, Smith-Lovin L. Changing the subject: gender, status, and the dynamics of topic change. Am Sociol Rev 2001;66:852-73.
23. Frankel R. Talking in interviews: a dispreference for patient-initiated questions in physician-patient encounters. In: Psathas G, ed. Interaction Competence. Washington DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, University Press of America 1990;231-62.
24. Button G. Moving out of closings. In: Button G, Lee JR, eds. Talk and Social Interaction. Clevedon; Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters 1987;101-51.
25. Schegloff EA. The routine as achievement. Hum Stud 1986;9:111-52.
26. Levinson SC. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983.
27. West C. Coordinating closings in primary care visits: producing continuity of care. In: Heritage J, Maynard DW, eds. Communication in Medical Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006;379-415.
28. Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G. A simplest systematic for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 1974;50:696-735.
29. Schegloff EA, Sacks H. Opening up closings. Semiotica 1973;7:289-327.
30. Johnson S. Preface to Shakespeare. In: Woudhuysen HR, ed. Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare. London: Penguin 1995;120-165.
31. Goffman E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Anchor Books 1959.
32. Monrouxe LV, Rees CE, Bradley P. The construction of patients' involvement in hospital bedside teaching encounters. Qual Health Res 2009;19:918-930.