Real-time maps of fluid flow fields in porous biomaterials

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1980-1986

  Mack, Julia J ^a   Youssef, Khalid ^a,b   Noel, Onika D V ^a   Lake, Michael P ^a   Wu, Ashley ^a   Iruela Arispe, M Luisa ^a   Bouchard, Louis S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Engineering IV   (United States)

Author keywords

3D scaffold; Flow; Fluid permeability; Hydrogel; NMR

Indexed keywords

3D SCAFFOLDS; CELL BEHAVIORS; COLLAGEN GELS; CONTROLLED FLOW; CRITICAL STEPS; FLOW; FLOW MAPS; FLUID FLOW PARAMETERS; FLUID PERMEABILITY; FLUID SHEAR; LOCAL HYDRODYNAMICS; MECHANICAL FORCE; MECHANISTIC EFFECTS; MICRO-FLOW; STRUCTURAL CHANGE;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; FLOW OF FLUIDS; HYDROGELS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SHEAR FLOW; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

BIOMATERIAL; BIOPOLYMER; COLLAGEN; FIBRIN; MATRIGEL; POLYCAPROLACTONE; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CELL FUNCTION; CELL GROWTH; CELL MATURATION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FLOW RATE; FLUID FLOW; FLUID PERMEABILITY; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYDROGEL; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SHEAR STRESS; VELOCITY;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOPOLYMERS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYDROGEL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; POLYESTERS; POROSITY; RHEOLOGY; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84871527670     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.030     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hollister S.J. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 2005, 4:518-524.
2. Dermenoudis S., Missirlis Y.F. Bioreactors for tissue engineering. Adv Mat 2010, 12:B592-B608.
3. Griffith L.G., Swartz M.A. Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006, 7:211-224.
4. Place E.S., Evans N.D., Stevens M.M. Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 2009, 8:457-470.
5. Adamo L., Naveiras O., Wenzel P.L., McKinney-Freeman S., Mack P.J., Gracia-Sancho J., et al. Biomechanical forces promote embryonic hematopoiesis. Nature 2009, 459:1131-1135.
6. Tzima E., Irani-Tehrani M., Kiosses W.B., Dejana E., Schultz D.A., Engelhardt B., et al. A mechanosensory complex that mediates the endothelial cell response to fluid shear stress. Nature 2005, 437:426-431.
7. Stolberg S., McCloskey K.E. Can shear stress direct stem cell fate?. Biotechnol Prog 2009, 25:10-19.
8. Obi S., Yamamoto K., Shimizu N., Kumagaya S., Masumura T., Sokabe T., et al. Fluid shear stress induces arterial differentiation of endothelial progenitor cells. J Appl Physiol 2009, 106:203-211.
9. Hahn C., Schwartz M.A. Mechanotransduction in vascular physiology and atherogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10:53-62.
10. Helm C.L., Fleury M.E., Zisch A.H., Boschetti F., Swartz M.A. Synergy between interstitial flow and VEGF directs capillary morphogenesis in vitro through a gradient amplification mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:15779-15784.
11. Boschetti F., Raimondi M.T., Migliavacca F., Dubini G. Prediction of the micro-fluid dynamic environment imposed to three-dimensional engineered cell systems in bioreactors. J Biomech 2006, 39:418-425.
12. Lesman A., Blinder Y., Levenberg S. Modeling of flow-induced shear stress applied on 3D cellular scaffolds: implications for vascular tissue engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng 2010, 105:645-654.
13. Jia Y., Bagnaninchi P.O., Yang Y., Haj A.E., Hinds M.T., Kirkpatrick S.J., et al. Doppler optical coherence tomography imaging of local fluid flow and shear stress within microporous scaffolds. J Biomed Opt 2009, 14:034014.
14. Santiago J.G., Wereley S.T., Melnhart C.D., Beebe D.J., Adrian R.J. A particle image velocimetry system for microfluidics. Exp Fluids 1998, 25:316-319.
15. Britton M., Callaghan P.T. Two-phase shear band structures at uniform stress. Phys Rev Lett 1997, 78:4930-4933.
16. Swider P., Conroy M., Pedrono A., Ambard D., Mantell S., Soballe K., et al. Use of high resolution MRI for investigation of fluid flow and global permeability in a material with interconnected porosity. J Biomech 2007, 40:2112-2118.
17. Youssef K., Mack J.J., Iruela-Arispe M.L., Bouchard L.-S. Macro-scale topology optimization for controlling internal shear stress in a porous scaffold bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 2012, 109:1844-1854.
18. Callaghan P.T. Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy 1991, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
19. Urchuk S.N., Plewes D.B. MR measurements of pulsatile pressure gradients. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994, 4:829-836.
20. Scheidegger A.E. The physics of flow through porous media 1974, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
21. Brandl F., Sommer F., Goepferich A. Rational design of hydrogels for tissue engineering: impact of physical factors on cell behavior. Biomaterials 2007, 28:134-146.
22. Drury J.L., Mooney D.J. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 2003, 24:4337-4351.
23. Lutolf M.P., Hubbell J.A. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol 2005, 23:47-55.
24. Seliktar D. Designing cell-compatible hydrogels for biomedical applications. Science 2012, 336:1124-1128.
25. Swartz M.A., Fleury M.E. Interstitial flow and its effects in soft tissues. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2007, 9:229-256.