Cognitive enhancements and the values of higher education

Health Care Analysis

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 347-355

  Lamkin, Matt ^a  

^a STANFORD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Enhancement; Higher education; Values

Indexed keywords

NOOTROPIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STUDENT; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

HUMANS; NOOTROPIC AGENTS; STUDENTS; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84871486304     PISSN: 10653058     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10728-012-0224-1     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bostrom, N., & Roache, R. (2009). Smart policy: Cognitive enhancement and the public interest. In J. Savulescu, et al. (Eds.), Enhancing human capacities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
2. Chau, V. (2007). Popping pills to study: Neuroethics in education. Stanford Journal of Neuroscience, 1(1), 18-20.
3. Faden, R., & Beauchamp, T. (1986). A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Farah, M. J., Illes, J., Cook-Deegan, R., Gardner, H., Kandel, E., King, P., et al. (2004). Neurocognitive enhancement: What can we do and what should we do? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(5), 421-425.
5. Grasgreen, A. (2010) Are prescription drugs "cheating"? Inside Higher Education, October 13, 2010.
6. Greely, H. T., Sahakian, B., Harris, J., Kessler, R., Gazzaniga, M. S., Campbell, P., et al. (2008). Towards responsible use of cognitive enhancing drugs by the healthy. Nature, 456, 702-705.
7. Hull, H. G. (2010). Regression by progression: Unleveling the classroom playing field through cosmetic neurology. 33 University of Hawai'i Law Review, 193, 193-221.
8. Jacobs, A. (2005). The Adderall advantage. Manhattan, New York: New York Times.
9. Pasquale, F. (2007). Technology, competition and values. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, 8, 607.
10. Pavisian, J. (2008-2009). The case for human ingenuity: How Adderall has sullied the game. 48 Washburn L.J. 175.
11. Quigley, M. (2008). Enhancing me enhancing you: Academic enhancement as a moral duty. Expositions, 2.2, 157-162.
12. Rosner, L. (Ed.). (2004). The technological fix: How people use technology to create and solve problems. New York: Routledge.
13. Sample, I. (2008). Exam cheating alert over brain drugs. London: The Guardian.
14. Schermer, M. (2008). Enhancements, easy shortcuts, and the richness of human activities. Bioethics, 22(7), 355-363.
15. Schermer, M. (2008). On the argument that enhancement is "cheating". Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 85-88.
16. Schermer, M. (2009). The future of psychopharmacological enhancements: Expectations and policies. Neuroethics, 2, 75-87.
17. Smith, C. A. (1936). "I certify on my honor", The real story of how the famed "Honor System" at University of Virginia Functions and what matriculating students should know about it. Richmond, Virginia: Richmond Times Dispatch.