Clinical application of prospective electrocardiogram-gated 320-detector computed tomography coronary angiography

National Medical Journal of China

Volumn 90, Issue 43, 2010, Pages 3079-3083

  Qin, Jie ^a   Liu, Ling Yun ^a   Meng, Xiao Chun ^a   Dong, Yun Xu ^a   Zhu, Jie Ming ^b   Zheng, Zhen Da ^b   Shan, Hong ^a  

^a THE THIRD AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Gated blood pool imaging; Tomography, X ray computed

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM GATED 320 DETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84871447064     PISSN: 03762491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2010.43.015     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Miller J M, Rochitte C E, Dewey M, et al. Dia gnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359:2324-2336.
2. 2010, 90:478-481.
3. Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology, 2008, 248:424-430.
4. Wink O, Hecht H S, Ruijters D. Coronary computed tomographic angiography in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: current applications and future developments. Cardiol Clin, 2009, 27: 513-529.
5. Rybicki F J, Otero H J, Steigner M L, et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2008, 24:535-546.
6. Blankstein R, Shah A, Pale R, et al. Radiation dose and image quality of prospective triggering with dual-source cardiac computed tomography. Am J Cardiol, 2009, 103:1168-1173.
7. 2008, 36:985-988.
8. Steigner M L, Otero H J, Cai T, et al. Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009, 25: 85-90.
9. 2010, 31:138-141.
10. Kim M J, Park C H, Choi S J, et al. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2009, 33:416-421.
11. Singh S, Kalra M K, Moore M A, et al. Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology, 2009, 252:200-208.
12. Park E A, Lee W, Kang J H, et al. The image quality and radiation dose of 100-kVp versus 120-kVp ECG-gated 16-slice CT coronary angiography. Korean J Radiol, 2009, 10: 235-243.
13. Fujioka C, Horiguchi J, Kiguchi M, et al. Survey of aorta and coronary arteries with prospective ECG-triggered 100-kV 64-MDCT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009, 193:227-233.
14. Einstein AJ, Elliston CD, Arai AE, et al. Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner. Radiology, 2010, 254:698-706.
15. van der Bijl N, de Bruin P W, Geleijns J, et al. Assessment of coronary artery calcium by using volumetric 320-row multi-detector computed tomography: comparison of 0.5 mm with 3.0 mm slice reconstructions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2010, 26:473-482.
16. Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T, et al. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol, 2009, 19:2576-2583.
17. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation, 2009, 120:867-875.
18. Meijboom W B, van Mieghem C A, Mollet N R, et al. 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 50:1469-1475.
19. Hamon M, Morello R, Riddell J W. Coronary arteries: diagnostic performance of 16-versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography: meta-analysis. Radiology, 2007, 245:720-731.
20. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Laule M, et al. Three-vessel coronary artery disease examined with 320-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Heart J, 2008, 29: 1669.
21. de Graaf F R, Schuijf J D, van Velzen J E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J, 2010, 31:1908-1915.