A 3D morphometric analysis of surface geometry in Levallois cores: Patterns of stability and variability across regions and their implications

Journal of Archaeological Science

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 1508-1517

  Lycett, Stephen J ^a   Von Cramon Taubadel, Noreen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Core variation; Geometric morphometric analysis; Levallois

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; ARCHAEOLOGY; GEOMETRY; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PALEOLITHIC; PLEISTOCENE; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

AFRICA; EUROPE; INDIA;

EID: 84871442389     PISSN: 03054403     EISSN: 10959238     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Archer W., Braun D.R. Variability in bifacial technology at Elandsfontein, Western cape, South Africa: a geometric morphometric approach. Journal of Archaeological Science 2010, 37:201-209.
2. Baumler M.F. Principles and properties of lithic core reduction: implications for Levallois technology. The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology 1995, 11-23. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin. H.L. Dibble, O. Bar-Yosef (Eds.).
3. Boëda E. Le concept laminaire: rupture et filiation avec le concept levallois. L'homme de Néanderthal. Etudes et Recherches Archéologiques de l'Université de Liège 35 1988, 41-49. M. Otte (Ed.).
4. Boëda E. Le Concept Levallois: Variabilité des Méthodes 1994, Centre de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris.
5. Boëda E. Levallois: a volumetric construction, methods, a technique. The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology 1995, 41-68. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin. H.L. Dibble, O. Bar-Yosef (Eds.).
6. Bookstein F.L. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1989, 11:567-585.
7. Bookstein F.L. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology 1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Bordes F. Principes d'une method d'étude des techniques de debitage et de la typologie du Paléolithique acient et moyen. L'Anthropologie 1950, 54:19-34.
9. Bordes F. Le débitage Levallois et ses variants. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 1980, 77:45-49.
10. Brantingham P.J., Kuhn S.L. Constraints on Levallois core technology: a mathematical model. Journal of Archaeological Science 2001, 28:747-761.
11. Brantingham P.J. The mathematics of chaînes opératoires. New Perspectives on Old Stones: Analytical Approaches to Palaeolithic Technologies 2010, 183-206. Springer, New York. S.J. Lycett, P.R. Chauhan (Eds.).
12. Braun D.R., Plummer T., Ferraro J.V., Ditchfield P., Bishop L.C. Raw material quality and Oldowan hominin toolstone preferences: evidence from Kanjera South, Kenya. Journal of Archaeological Science 2009, 36:1605-1614.
13. Buchanan B., Collard M. An assessment of the impact of resharpening on Paleoindian projectile point blade shape using geometric morphometric techniques. New Perspectives on Old Stones: Analytical Approaches to Palaeolithic Technologies 2010, 255-273. Springer, New York. S.J. Lycett, P.R. Chauhan (Eds.).
14. Buchanan B., Collard M. A geometric morphometrics-based assessment of blade shape differences among Paleoindian projectile point types from western North America. Journal of Archaeological Science 2010, 37:350-359.
15. Byrne R.W., Russon A.E. Learning by imitation: a hierarchical approach. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1998, 21:667-721.
16. Callahan E. An interview with flintknapper Jaques Pelegrin. Contract Abstracts 1982, 3:62-70.
17. Cardillo M. Some applications of geometric morphometrics to archaeology. Morphometrics for Nonmorphometricians 2010, 325-344. Springer, New York. A.M.T. Elewa (Ed.).
18. Chapman R.E. Conventional Procrustes approaches. Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop Special Publication No. 2 1990, 251-267. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor. F.J. Rohlf, F.L. Bookstein (Eds.).
19. Clarke D.L. Analytical Archaeology 1968, Methuen, London.
20. Clarkson C. Regional diversity within the core technology of the Howiesons Poort techno-complex. New Perspectives on Old Stones: Analytical Approaches to Paleolithic Technologies 2010, 43-59. Springer, New York. S.J. Lycett, P.R. Chauhan (Eds.).
21. Commont V. L'industrie moustérianne dans la région du Nord de la France. Congès Préhistorique de France 5ème session. Bureaux de la Société Préhistorique de France, Paris 1909, 115-157.
22. Copeland L. Are Levallois flakes in the Levantine Acheulian the result of biface preparation?. The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology 1995, 171-183. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin. H.L. Dibble, O. Bar-Yosef (Eds.).
23. Costa A.G. A geometric morphometric assessment of plan shape in bone and stone Acheulean bifaces from the Middle Pleistocene site of Castel di Guido, Latium, Italy. New Perspectives on Old Stones: Analytical Approaches to Paleolithic Technologies 2010, 23-41. Springer, New York. S.J. Lycett, P.R. Chauhan (Eds.).
24. DeBono H., Goren-Inbar N. Note of a link between Acheulian handaxes and the Levallois method. Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society 2001, 31:9-23.
25. The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology 1995, Prehistory Press, Wisconsin. H.L. Dibble, O. Bar-Yosef (Eds.).
26. Dryden I.L., Mardia K.V. Statistical Shape Analysis 1998, Wiley, London.
27. Eren M., Bradley B. Experimental evaluation of the Levallois " core shape maintenance" hypothesis. Lithic Technology 2009, 34:119-125.
28. Eren M.I., Lycett S.J. Why Levallois? A morphometric comparison of experimental 'preferential' Levallois flakes versus debitage flakes. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(e29273):1-10.
29. Eren M.I., Bradley B., Sampson C.G. Middle Paleolithic skill-level and the individual knapper: an experiment. American Antiquity 2011, 76:229-251.
30. Eren M.I., Lycett S.J., Roos C., Sampson C.G. Toolstone constraints on knapping skill: Levallois reduction with two different raw materials. Journal of Archaeological Science 2011, 38:2731-2739.
31. Faisal A., Stout D., Apel J., Bradley B. The manipulative complexity of Lower Paleolithic stone toolmaking. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(e13718):1-11.
32. Fogarty L., Strimling P., Laland K. The evolution of teaching. Evolution 2011, 65:2760-2770.
33. Gamble C. The Palaeolithic Societies of Europe 1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
34. Gower J.C. Generalised Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 1975, 40:33-50.
35. Gowlett J.A.J. The future of lithic analysis in Palaeolithic Archaeology: a view from the Old World. New Perspectives on Old Stones: Analytical Approaches to Palaeolithic Technologies 2010, 295-309. Springer, New York. S.J. Lycett, P.R. Chauhan (Eds.).
36. Gowlett J.A.J. The Empire of the Acheulean strikes back. Casting the Net Wide: Papers in Honor of Glynn Isaac and His Approach to Human Origins Research 2011, 93-114. American School of Prehistoric Research, Cambridge, MA. J. Sept, D. Pilbeam (Eds.).
37. Guichard J., Guichard G. The Early and Middle Paleolithic of Nubia: a preliminary report. Contributions to the Prehistory of Nubia 1965, 57-116. Fort Burgwin and Southern Methodist University Press, Dallas. F. Wendorf (Ed.).
38. Haslam M., Clarkson C., Petraglia M.D., Korisettar R., Jones S., Shipton C., Ditchfield P., Ambrose S. The 74 ka Toba super-eruption and southern Indian hominins: archaeology, lithic technology and environments at Jwalapuram Locality 3. Journal of Archaeological Science 2010, 37:3370-3384.
39. Hayden B. The cultural capacities of Neandertals: a review and re-evaluation. Journal of Human Evolution 1993, 24:113-146.
40. Hovers E. The Lithic Assemblages of Qafzeh Cave 2009, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
41. Hublin J.J. The origin of Neandertals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2009, 106:16022-16027.
42. Isaac G.L. Foundation stones: early artefacts as indicators of activities and abilities. Stone Age Prehistory 1986, 221-241. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. G.N. Bailey, P. Callow (Eds.).
43. Ioviţâ R.P. Comparing stone tool resharpening trajectories with the aid of elliptical Fourier analysis. New Perspectives on Old Stones: Analytical Approaches to Palaeolithic Technologies 2010, 235-253. Springer, New York. S.J. Lycett, P.R. Chauhan (Eds.).
44. Ioviţâ R. Shape variation in Aterian tanged tools and the origins of projectile technology: a morphometric perspective on stone tool function. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(e29029):1-14.
45. Kelley H. Contribution à l'étude de la technique de la taille levalloisienne. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Francaise 1954, 51:149-169.
46. Leroi-Gourhan A. La Préhistoire 1966, Universitaires de France, Paris.
47. Lockwood C.A., Lynch J.M., Kimbel W.H. Quantifying temporal bone morphology of great apes and humans: an approach using geometric morphometrics. Journal of Anatomy 2002, 201:447-464.
48. Lycett S.J. Is the Soanian techno-complex a Mode 1 or Mode 3 phenomenon? A morphometric assessment. Journal of Archaeological Science 2007, 34:1434-1440.
49. Lycett S.J. Why is there a lack of Mode 3 Levallois technologies in East Asia? A phylogenetic test of the Movius-Schick hypothesis. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2007, 26:541-575.
50. Lycett S.J. Are Victoria West cores " proto-Levallois" ? A phylogenetic assessment. Journal of Human Evolution 2009, 56:175-191.
51. Lycett S.J., Gowlett J.A.J. On questions surrounding the Acheulean 'tradition'. World Archaeology 2008, 40:295-315.
52. Lycett S.J., von Cramon-Taubadel N., Foley R.A. A crossbeam co-ordinate caliper for the morphometric analysis of lithic nuclei: a description, test and empirical examples of application. Journal of Archaeological Science 2006, 33:847-861.
53. Lycett S.J., von Cramon-Taubadel N., Gowlett J.A.J. A comparative 3D geometric morphometric analysis of Victoria West cores: implications for the origins of Levallois technology. Journal of Archaeological Science 2010, 37:1110-1117.
54. MacLeod N. Landmarks, localization, and the use of morphometrics in phylogenetic analysis. Fossils, Phylogeny, and Form: An Analytical Approach 2001, 197-233. Kluwer/Plenum, New York. J.M. Adrain, G.D. Edgecombe, B.S. Lieberman (Eds.).
55. Mellars P. The Neanderthal Legacy: an Archaeological Perspective from Western Europe 1996, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
56. Moncel M.H., Moigne A.M., Sam Y., Combier J. The emergence of Neanderthal technical behavior: new evidence from Orgnac 3 (Level 1, MIS 8), southeastern France. Current Anthropology 2011, 52:37-75.
57. Monnier G.F., McNulty K.P. Questioning the link between stone tool standardization and behavioral modernity. New Perspectives on Old Stones: Analytical Approaches to Palaeolithic Technologies 2010, 61-81. Springer, New York. S.J. Lycett, P.R. Chauhan (Eds.).
58. Niewoehner W.A. A geometric morphometric analysis of late Pleistocene human metacarpel 1 base shape. Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology 2005, 285-298. Kluwer, New York. D.E. Slice (Ed.).
59. Norton C.J., Bae K., Harris J.W.K., Lee H. Middle Pleistocene handaxes from the Korean Peninsula. Journal of Human Evolution 2006, 51:527-536.
60. O'Higgins P. The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: biology, landmarks and geometry. Journal of Anatomy 2000, 197:103-120.
61. O'Higgins P., Jones N. Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three-dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation. Journal of Anatomy 1998, 193:251-272.
62. O'Higgins P., Jones N. Tools for Statistical Shape Analysis 2006, Hull York Medical School.
63. Olszewski D.I., Dibble H.L., McPherron S.P., Schurmans U.A., Chiotti L., Smith J.R. Nubian Complex strategies in the Egyptian high desert. Journal of Human Evolution 2010, 59:188-201.
64. Pelegrin J. Remarks about archaeological techniques and methods of knapping. Stone Knapping: the Necessary Conditions for a Uniquely Hominin Behaviour 2005, 23-33. McDonald Institute Monographs, Cambridge. V. Roux, B. Bril (Eds.).
65. Petraglia M.D., Shipton C. Large cutting tool variation west and east of the Movius Line. Journal of Human Evolution 2009, 57:326-330.
66. Reyes-García V., Broesch J., Calvet-Mir L., Fuentes-Peláez N., McDade T.W., Parsa S., Tanner S., Huanca T., Leonard W.R., Martínez-Rodríguez M.R. Cultural transmission of ethnobotanical knowledge and skills: an empirical analysis from an Amerindian society. Evolution and Human Behavior 2009, 30:274-285.
67. Rolland N. Levallois technique emergence: single or multiple? A review of the Euro-African record. The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology 1995, 333-359. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin. H.L. Dibble, O. Bar-Yosef (Eds.).
68. Rose J.I., Usik V.I., Marks A.E., Yamandu H., Hilbert Y.H., Christopher S., Galletti C.S., Ash Parton A., Jean Marie Geiling J.M., černý C., Morley M.W., Roberts R.G. The Nubian complex of Dhofar, Oman: an African middle stone age industry in southern Arabia. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(11):e28239.
69. Sandgathe D.M. Examining the Levallois Reduction Strategy from a Design Theory Point of View. BAR International Series 1417 2005, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.
70. Schick K. A comparative perspective on Paleolithic cultural patterns. Neandertals and Modern Humans in Western Asia 1998, 449-460. Plenum Press, New York. T. Akazawa, K. Aoki, O. Bar-Yosef (Eds.).
71. Schlanger N. Understanding Levallois: lithic technology and cognitive archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1996, 6:231-254.
72. Scott B. Becoming Neanderthals: the Earlier British Middle Palaeolithic 2011, Oxbow Books, Oxford.
73. Semaw S. The oldest stone artifacts from Gona (2.6-2.5 Ma), Afar, Ethiopia: implications for understanding the earliest stages of stone knapping. The Oldowan: Case Studies into the Earliest Stone Age 2006, Stone Age Institute Press, Bloomington, Indiana. N. Toth, K. Schick (Eds.).
74. Sharon G. Acheulian giant-core technology. Current Anthropology 2009, 50:335-367.
75. Shea J.J. Stone Age visiting cards revisited: a strategic perspective on the lithic technology of early hominin dispersal. Out of Africa 1: the First Hominin Colonization of Eurasia 2010, 47-64. Springer, New York. J.G. Fleagle, J.J. Shea, F.E. Grine, A.L. Baden, R. Leakey (Eds.).
76. Shott M., Trail B. Exploring new approaches to lithic analysis: laser scanning and geometric morphometrics. Lithic Technology 2010, 35:195-220.
77. Slice D.E. Geometric morphometrics. Annual Review of Anthropology 2007, 36:261-281.
78. Smith R.A. A Palaeolithic industry at Northfleet, Kent. Archaeologica 1911, 62:512-532.
79. Tomasello M. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition 1999, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
80. Thomson D'.W. On Growth and Form 1917, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
81. Thulman D.K. Discriminating Paleoindian point types from Florida using landmark geometric morphometrics. Journal of Archaeological Science 2012, 39:1599-1607.
82. Toth N., Schick K. The Oldowan: the tool making of early hominins and chimpanzees compared. Annual Review of Anthropology 2009, 38:289-305.
83. Tryon C.A., McBrearty S., Texier J.P. Levallois lithic technology from the Kapthurin formation, Kenya: Acheulian origin and Middle Stone Age diversity. African Archaeological Review 2006, 22:199-229.
84. Tuffreau A., Antoine P. The earliest occupation of Europe: continental northwestern Europe. The Earliest Occupation of Europe 1995, 147-163. University of Leiden and European Science Foundation, Leiden. W. Roebroeks, T. van Kolfschoten (Eds.).
85. Usik, V.I., Rose, J.I., Hilbert, Y.H., Van Peer, P., Marks, A.E. Nubian Complex reduction strategies in Dhofar, southern Oman. Quaternary International, doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2012.08.2111.
86. Van Peer P. Interassemblage variability and Levallois styles: the case of the northern African Middle Palaeolithic. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1991, 10:107-151.
87. Van Peer P. The Levallois Reduction Strategy 1992, Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin.
88. Van Peer P., Vermeersch P. The place of northeast Africa in the early history of modern humans: new data and interpretations on the Middle Stone Age. Rethinking the Human Revolution 2007, 187-198. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge. P. Mellars, K. Boyle, O. Bar-Yosef, C. Stringer (Eds.).
89. Vaughan C.D. A million years of style and function: regional and temporal variation in Acheulean handaxes. Style and Function: Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Archaeology 2001, 141-163. Bergin & Garvey, Westport, Connecticut. T.D. Hurt, G.F.M. Rakita (Eds.).
90. von Cramon-Taubadel N. Congruence of individual cranial bone morphology and neutral molecular affinity patterns in modern humans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 2009, 140:205-215.
91. Wang W., Lycett S.J., von Cramon-Taubadel N., Jin J.J.H., Bae C.J. Comparison of handaxes from Bose Basin (China) and the western Acheulean indicates convergence of form, not cognitive differences. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(e35804):1-7.
92. Whiten A., Horner V., Litchfield C.A., Marshall-Pescini S. How do apes ape?. Learning & Behavior 2004, 32:36-52.
93. Wilkins J., Pollarolo L., Kuman K. Prepared core reduction at the site of Kudu Koppie in northern South Africa: temporal patterns across the Earlier and Middle Stone Age boundary. Journal of Archaeological Science 2010, 37:1279-1292.
94. Wynn T., Tierson F. Regional comparison of the shapes of later Acheulean handaxes. American Anthropologist 1990, 92:73-84.
95. Wynn T., Coolidge F.L. The expert Neandertal mind. Journal of Human Evolution 2004, 46:467-487.
96. Wynn T., Coolidge F.L. How Levallois reduction is similar to, and not similar to, playing chess. Stone Tools and the Evolution of Human Cognition 2010, 83-103. University Press of Colorado, Boulder. A. Nowell, I. Davidson (Eds.).
97. Wynn T., Hernandez-Aguilar R.A., Marchant L.F., McGrew W.C. "An ape's view of the Oldowan" revisited. Evolutionary Anthropology 2011, 20:181-197.
98. Yravedra J., Domínguez-Rodrigo M., Santonja M., Pérez-González A., Panera J., Rubio-Jara S., Baquedano E. Cut marks on the Middle Pleistocene elephant carcass of áridos 2 (Madrid, Spain). Journal of Archaeological Science 2010, 37:2469-2476.