Some applications of geometric morphometrics to archaeology

Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences

Volumn 124, Issue , 2010, Pages 325-341

  Cardillo, Marcelo ^a  

^a IMHICIHU CONICET ^*  (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85030431181     PISSN: 09300317     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-95853-6_15     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Aschero CA (1988). El sitio ICC4: un asentamiento precerámico en la Quebrado de Inca Cueva (Jujuy, Argentina). Estudios Atacameños 7
2. Aschero CA, L Manzi and AG Gomez (1993–1994). Producción lítica y uso del espacio en el nivel 2b4 de Quebrada seca 3. Relaciones 19. Sociedad Argentina de Antropología. Buenos Aires
3. Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometrics tools for landmarks data. Geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press. NY
4. Bookstein FL (1996/1997) Landmarks methods for form without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis. Oxford University press. 1(3) 225-243
5. Brande S and I Saragusti (1996) A Morphometric model and landmark analysis of acheulian handaxes from norhern Israel. Advances in morphometrics. Edited by LF Marcus, MConti, A Loy, GJP Naylor and DE Slice. Plenum, New York
6. Boyd R and PJ Richerson (1995) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press. Chicago
7. Brande S and I Saragusti (1999) Arti-Facts Graphic visualization of Handaxes and other atifacts. Near Eastern Archaeology 62(4) 242-245
8. Buchanan B (2006) An analysis of Folsom projectile point resharpening using quantitative comparisons of form and allometry. Journal of Archaeological Science 33:185–199
9. Cardillo M (2006) Explorando la variación en las morfologías líticas a partir de las técnicas de análisis de contornos. El caso de las puntas de proyectil del holocenomedio-tardío de la Puna de Salta (San Antonio de los Cobres, Argentina). Werken 7, 77-88
10. Cardillo M and J Charlin (2009) Tendencias observadas en la variabilidad de los raspadores de norte y sur de Patagonia. Explorando las interrelaciones entre forma, tamaño e historia de vida. Arqueometría Latinoamericana 2do. Congreso Argentino y 1ro Latinoamericano. Vol. 2, 351–359. Buenos Aires.
11. Argentina Cardillo M (2009) Variabilidad en la manufactura y diseño de artefactos en el área costera patagónica. Un enfoque integrador Doctoral dissertation. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Universidad de Buenos Aires. MS
12. Castiñeira C, M Cardillo, J Charlin, J C Fernicola and J Baeza (2009) Análisis morfométrico de cabezales líticos “cola de pescado” de la Rep Oriental del Uruguay. Arqueometría Latinoamericana. 2do. Congreso Argentino y 1ro Latinoamericano. Vol. 1, 360–366. Buenos Aires.
13. Argentina Cavalli-Sforza L and MW Feldman (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. Princeton University Press. Princeton
14. Crompton RH and JA Gowlett (1993) Allometry and multidimensional form in Acheulian Bifaces from KilombeKenya. Journal of Human Evolution 25, 175-199
15. Dunnell, RC (1971) Systematics in prehistory. Free press, NY
16. Dunnell RC (1978) Style and function: a fundamental dichotomy. American Antiquity 43, 192-202
17. Eerkens JW (2000) Practice makes whithin 5% of perfect: the role of visual perception, motor skills, and human memory in artifact variation and standardization. Current Anthropology 41, 663-668
18. Eerkens JW and RL Bettinger (2001) Techniques for asseing standardization in artifact assemblages. Can we scale material variability? American Antiquity 66(3) 493-504
19. Ferson S, FJ Rohlf and R Koehn (1985) Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines. Systematic Zoology 34, 59-68
20. Franco NV, M Cardillo and LA Borrero (2005) Una primera aproximación a la variabilidad presente en las puntas de proyectil denominadas “Bird IV”. Werken 6, 81-95
21. Franco NV, A Castro, M Cardillo and J Charlin (2009) La importancia de las variables morfológicas, métricas y de microdesgaste para evaluar las diferencias en diseños de puntas de proyectil bifaciales pedunculadas: un ejemplo del sur de Patagonia continental. Magallania 37(1) 99-112
22. Gero J and J Mazzullo (1984) Analysis of artifact shape using Fourier series in closed form. Journal of Field Archaeology 11(3) 315-322
23. Grosman L, O Smikt and U Smilansky (2008) On the application of 3-D scanning technology for the documentation and typology of lithic artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 35, 3101-3110
24. Hammer Ø, DAT Harper and PD Ryan (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4 (1) 9. http://palaeoelectronica. org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm
25. Hiscock P (2003) Early Australian implement variation: a reduction model. Journal of Achaeological Science 30, 239-249
26. Hiscock P (2007) Looking the other way. A materialist/technological approach to classifying tools and implements, cores and retouched flakes. Tools versus Cores? Alternative approaches to Stone Tool Analysis. Edited by S. McPherron. Cambridge Scholars Publishing: 198–222
27. Hiscock P and C Clarkson (2005) Experimental evaluation of Kuhn’s Geometric Index of Reduction and the flat-flake problem. Journal of Archaeological Science 32:1015–1022
28. Kuhl FP and CR Giardina (1982) Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 18, 236-258
29. Lycett SJ, N von Cramon-Taubadel and RA Foley (2006) A crossbeam co-ordinate caliper for the morphometric analysisof lithic nuclei: a description, test and empirical examples of application. Journal of Archaeological Science 33, 847-861
30. Marcus L F (1990) Traditional morphometrics. Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop, Edited by FJ Rohlf and FL Bookstein, Special Publication Number 2. The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. Ann Arbor. Michigan. 77:122
31. Martínez JG (1997) Estrategias y Técnicas de caza. Análisis tipológico-tecnológico de proyectiles arqueológicos. Trabajo Final de la Carrera de Arqueología. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Universidad Nacional del Tucumán. MS
32. Martínez JG (1999) Puntas de proyectil, diseño y materias primas. En los tres reinos: prácticas de recolección en el Cono Sur de América. Edited by Por CA Aschero, MA Korstanje and PM Vuoto. Magna Publicaciones. Universidad Nacional del Tucumán. Argentina. 61-69
33. Nami H (2007) Research in the middle Negro river basin (Uruguay) and the paleoindian occupation of the southern cone. Current Anthropology, 48 164-174
34. Peres-Neto PR, and DA Jackson (2001) How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia (Berl.). 129: 169–178
35. Ratto N (2003) Estrategias de caza y propiedades del registro arqueológico en la Puna de Chaschuil (Dpto de Tinogasta, Catamarca, Argentina). Doctoral dissertation. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Universidad de Buenos Aires. MS
36. Rohlf FJ (1990) Fitting curves to outlines. Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop. Special Publication No. 2, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, AnnArbor 167-178
37. Rohlf FJ (1993) Relative warp analysis and an example of its application to mosquito wings. Contributions to Morphometrics, Edited by LF Marcus, E Bello and A Garcia-Valdecasas, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC). Madrid. Spain. 8 131-159
38. Rohlf FJ (1998) Review of “Fourier descriptors and their applications in biology”. Bull. Math. Biol. 60:604–605.
39. Rohlf FJ (1999) Shape statistics: procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification 16, 197-223
40. Rohlf FJ and M Corti (2000) The use of partial least-squares to study covariation in shape. Systematic Biology 49 740-753
41. Rohlf FJ (2002a) tps software series. http//life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/
42. Rohlf FJ (2002b) Geometric morphometrics in phylogeny. In Morphology, shape and phylogenetics. Edited by P Forey and N Francis and Taylor. London. 175-193
43. Rohlf FJ and FL Bookstein (2003) Computing the uniform component of shape variation. Systematic Biology 52, 66-69
44. Saitou N and M Nei (1987) The neigbor-joining method: a new metod for reconstructing pylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4(4) 406-425
45. Scartascini F and M Cardillo (2009) Explorando la variabilidad métrica y morfológica de las “pesas líticas” recuperadas en el sector norte de la costa del golfo de San Matías. Arqueometría Latinoamericana. 2do. Congreso Argentino y 1ro Latinoamericano. Vol. 1, 162–175. Buenos Aires. Argentina
46. Saragusti I, I Sharon, O Katzenelson and D Avnir (1998) Quantitative analysis of the symmetry of artifacts: lower Paleolithic handaxes. Journal of Archeological Science 25, 817-825
47. Saragusti I, A Karasik, I Sharon and U Smilansky (2005) Quantitative analysis of shape attributes based on contours and section profiles in artifact analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 3 841-853
48. Sheets HD (2003) IMP-Integrated Morphometrics Package. Department of Physics, Canisius College, Buffalo, New York. http://www2.canisius.edu/~sheets/morphsoft.html
49. Sheets HD, K Kim and CE Mitchell (2004) A combined landmark and outline-based approach to ontogenetic shape change in the Ordovician trilobite Triathrus becki. Morphometrics applications in biology and paleontology. Edited by AMT Elewa. Berlin. Springer. 67-82
50. Sheets HD, KM Covino, JM Panasiewicz and SR Morris (2006) Comparison of geometric morphometric outline methods in the discrimination of age-related differences in feather shape. Frontiers in Zoology 3:15
51. Shott MJ (1996) Innovation and selection in prehistory. A case study from the American bottom. Stone tools theoretical insights into human prehistory. Edited by G Odell, Plenum Press. New York. 279-309
52. Shott MJ, DA Hunzicker and B Patten (2007) Pattern and allometric measurement of reduction in experimental Folsom bifaces. Lithic Technology 32(2) 203-217
53. Slice DE (1998) Morpheus et al. Software for morphometric research department of ecology and evolution, State University of New York. Stony Brook. NY. http://www.morphometrics.org/morpheus.html
54. Wynn T and F Tierson (1990) Regional comparison of the shapes of later Acheulian handaxes. American Anthropologist 92, 73:87
55. Zelditch ML, DL Swiderski, DH Sheets and WL Fink (2004) Geometric Morphometrics for Biologist. A Primer. Elsevier. Academic Press. NY