Gender differences of the morphology of the distal femur and proximal tibia in a Korean population

Knee

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 26-30

  Lim, Hong Chul ^a   Bae, Ji Hoon ^a   Yoon, Ji Yeol ^a   Kim, Seung Ju ^a   Kim, Jae Gyoon ^a   Lee, Jae Moon ^a  

^a Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Femur; Gender difference; Knee; Tibia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; BONE IMPLANT; FEMALE; FEMORAL LATERAL ANTEROPOSTERIOR DIMENSION; FEMORAL MEDIAL ANTEROPOSTERIOR DIMENSION; FEMORAL MEDIOLATERAL DIMENSION; FEMUR; HUMAN; KOREA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TIBIA; TIBIAL LATERAL ANTEROPOSTERIOR DIMENSION; TIBIAL MEDIAL ANTEROPOSTERIOR DIMENSION; TIBIAL MEDIOLATERAL DIMENSION;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SEX FACTORS; TIBIA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84871412592     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: 18735800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., Scott W.N. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 13-14.
2. Incavo S.J., Ronchetti P.J., Howe J.G., Tranowski J.P. Tibial plateau coverage in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 81-85.
3. Westrich G.H., Haas S.B., Insall J.N., Frachie A. Resection specimen analysis of proximal tibial anatomy based on 100 total knee arthroplasty specimens. J Arthroplasty 1995, 10:47-51.
4. Greene K.A. Gender-specific design in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:27-31.
5. Barrett W.P. The need for gender-specific prostheses in TKA: does size make a difference?. Orthopedics 2006, 29:S53-S55.
6. Conley S., Rosenberg A., Crowninshield R. The female knee: anatomic variations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007, 15(Suppl. 1):S31-S36.
7. Merchant A.C., Arendt E.A., Dye S.F., Fredericson M., Grelsamer R.P., Leadbetter W.B., et al. The female knee: anatomic variations and the female-specific total knee design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:3059-3065.
8. Mahfouz M.R., Merkl B.C., Fatah E.E., Booth R., Argenson J.N. Automatic methods for characterization of sexual dimorphism of adult femora: distal femur. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2007, 10:447-456.
9. Hitt K., Shurman J.R., Greene K., McCarthy J., Moskal J., Hoeman T., et al. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A(Suppl. 4):115-122.
10. Chin K.R., Dalury D.F., Zurakowski D., Scott R.D. Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2002, 15:213-217.
11. Lingard E.A., Katz J.N., Wright E.A., Sledge C.B. Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:2179-2186.
12. MacDonald S.J., Charron K.D., Bourne R.B., Naudie D.D., McCalden R.W., Rorabeck C.H. The John Insall Award: gender-specific total knee replacement: prospectively collected clinical outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:2612-2616.
13. Clarke H.D., Hentz J.G. Restoration of femoral anatomy in TKA with unisex and gender-specific components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:2711-2716.
14. Cheng F.B., Ji X.F., Lai Y., Feng J.C., Zheng W.X., Sun Y.F., et al. Three dimensional morphometry of the knee to design the total knee arthroplasty for Chinese population. Knee 2009, 16:341-347.
15. Ho W.P., Cheng C.K., Liau J.J. Morphometrical measurements of resected surface of femurs in Chinese knees: correlation to the sizing of current femoral implants. Knee 2006, 13:12-14.
16. Uehara K., Kadoya Y., Kobayashi A., Ohashi H., Yamano Y. Anthropometry of the proximal tibia to design a total knee prosthesis for the Japanese population. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:1028-1032.
17. Mahfouz M., Abdel Fatah E.E., Bowers L.S., Scuderi G. Three-dimensional morphology of the knee reveals ethnic differences. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470:172-185.
18. Yue B., Varadarajan K.M., Ai S., Tang T., Rubash H.E., Li G. Differences of knee anthropometry between Chinese and white men and women. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26:124-130.
19. Vaidya S.V., Ranawat C.S., Aroojis A., Laud N.S. Anthropometric measurements to design total knee prostheses for the Indian population. J Arthroplasty 2000, 15:79-85.
20. Fowler J.R., Ilyas A.M. The accuracy of digital radiography in orthopaedic applications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469:1781-1784.
21. Kwak D.S., Surendran S., Pengatteeri Y.H., Park S.E., Choi K.N., Gopinathan P., et al. Morphometry of the proximal tibia to design the tibial component of total knee arthroplasty for the Korean population. Knee 2007, 14:295-300.
22. Mensch J.S., Amstutz H.C. Knee morphology as a guide to knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975, 231-241.