The accuracy of digital radiography in orthopaedic applications

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 469, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1781-1784

  Fowler, John R ^a,b   Ilyas, Asif M ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL IMAGING; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; FRACTURE REDUCTION; IMAGE QUALITY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHANTOM; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY;

EID: 79959566800     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1628-6     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Almenar Garcia A, Forner Navarro L, Ubet Castello V, Minana Laliga R. Evaluation of a digital radiography to estimate working length. J Endod. 1997;23:363-365.
2. Blokker CP, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Tibial plateau fractures: an analysis of the results of treatment in 60 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;182:193-199. (Pubitemid 14182860)
3. Burger CL, Mork TO, Hutter JW, Nicoll B. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals. J Endod. 1999;25:260-263.
4. Cole RJ, Bindra RR, Evanoff BA, Gilula LA, Yamaguchi K, Gelberman RH. Radiographic evaluation of osseous displacement following intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: reliability of plain radiography versus computed tomography. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22:792-800. (Pubitemid 27431187)
5. Decoster TA, Nepola JV, el-Khoury GY. Cast brace treatment of proximal tibia fractures: a ten-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;231:196-204.
6. Garmer M, Hennigs SP, Jager HJ, Schrick F, van de Loo T, Jacobs A, Hanusch A, Christmann A, Mathias K. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:75-80. (Pubitemid 30030213)
7. Hedrick RT, Dove SB, Peters DD, McDavid WD. Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography. J Endod. 1994;20:320-326.
8. Knirk JL, Jupiter JB. Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:647-659. (Pubitemid 16073916)
9. Marsh JL, Buckwalter J, Gelberman R, Dirschl D, Olson S, Brown T, Llinias A. Articular fractures: does an anatomic reduction really change the result?. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1259-1271.
10. Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1632-1645. (Pubitemid 27020610)
11. Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC, Hendricks P. Fractures of the acetabulum: a retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;205:230-240.
12. Rowlands JA. The physics of computed radiography. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47:R123-166.
13. Schatzker J, McBroom R, Bruce D. The tibial plateau fracture: the Toronto experience 1968-1975. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979:138:94-104.
14. Trumble TE, Schmitt SR, Vedder NB. Factors affecting functional outcome of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 1994;19:325-340. (Pubitemid 24105129)
15. Woolhiser GA, Brand JW, Hoen MM, Geist JR, Pikula AA, Pink FE. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:499-504. (Pubitemid 40379783)