Troubles with assessments in gifting occasions

Discourse Studies

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 753-777

  Robles, Jessica S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Alignment; assessments; authenticity; communication dilemmas; discourse analysis; gifting; morality; ritual

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871399301     PISSN: 14614456     EISSN: 14617080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461445612457490     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Areni CS,Kiecker P,Palan KM.Is it better to give than to receive? Exploring gender differences in the meaning of memorable gifts.Psychology and Marketing. 1998;15:81-109.
2. Belk RW.Possessions and the extended self.Journal of Consumer Research. 1988;15:139-168.
3. Bergmann J.Introduction: Morality in discourse.Research on Language and Social Interaction. 1998;31:279-294.
4. Camerer C.Gifts as economic symbols and social symbols.American Journal of Sociology. 1988;94:180-214.
5. Cheal DJ.The social dimensions of gift behaviour.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1986;3:423-439.
6. Craig RTCommunication as: Perspectives on Theory. Shepherd GJSt John JStriphas T, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2006:38-47.
7. Craig RT,Tracy K.Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion.Communication Theory. 1995;5:248-272.
8. Fox B.Directions in research: Language and the body.Research on Language and Social Interaction. 1999;32:51-59.
9. Goffman EThe Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books; 1959:.
10. Goffman EInteraction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books; 1967:.
11. Goffman EFrame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row; 1974:.
12. Goffman EForms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1981:.
13. Good JS,Beach WA.Opening up gift openings: Birthday parties as situated activity systems.Text. 2005;25:565-593.
14. Goodwin C.Language, culture, social organization and the material word: Why a five field approach is necessary.Teaching Anthropology: SACC Notes. 2007;13:5-9.
15. Goodwin C,Goodwin MH.Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments.Pragmatics. 1987;1:1-54.
16. Heath C.Demonstrative suffering: The gestural (re)embodiment of symptoms.Journal of Communication. 2002;52:597-617.
17. Hua Z,Wei L,Yuan Q.The sequential organisation of gift offering and acceptance in Chinese.Journal of Pragmatics. 2000;32:81-103.
18. Lindström A,Mondada L.Assessments in social interaction: Introduction to the special issue.Research on Language and Social Interaction. 2009;42:299-308.
19. Pomerantz AStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Atkinson JMHeritage J, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984:57-101.
20. Rothenbuhler EWCommunication as: Perspectives on Theory. Shepherd GJSt John JStriphas T, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2006:13-22.
21. Sacks HSociocultural Dimensions of Language Use. Blount BSanches M, ed. New York: Academic Press; 1975:57-80.
22. Stokoe EH.Mothers, single women and sluts: Gender, morality and membership categorization in neighbour disputes.Feminism & Psychology. 2003;13:317-344.
23. Tracy K.Action-implicative discourse analysis.Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 1995;14:195-215.
24. Tracy K,Ashcraft C.Crafting policies about controversial values: How wording disputes manage a group dilemma.Journal of Applied Communication Research. 2001;29:297-316.