Directions in research: Language and the body

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 32, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 51-59

  Fox, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039134402     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi321&2_7     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Berkovits, R. (1984). Duration and fundamental frequency in sentence-final intonation. Journal of Phonetics, 137, 255-265.
2. Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (Eds.). (1996). Prosody in conversation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3. Dreyfus, H. (1993). What computers still can't do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1972)
4. Dreyfus, H. (1991). Being-in-the-world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Duncan, S. (1974). Some signals and rules for taking speaker turns in conversations. In S. Weitz (Ed.), Nonverbal communication (pp. 298-311). New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W. (1977). Face to face interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Ford, C. (1993). Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Ford, C., & Fox, B. (1996). Interactional motivations for reference formulation: He had.This guy had a beautiful, thirty-two O:lds. In B. Fox (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (pp. 145-168). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9. Ford, C., Fox, B., & Thompson, S. (1996a). Practices in the construction of turns: The 'TCU' revisited. Pragmatics, 6, 427-454.
10. Ford, C., Fox, B., & Thompson, S. (1996b, November). Simultaneous practices of turn projection. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Anthropological Association.
11. Ford, C., & Thompson, S. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the projection of turn completion. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Grammar and interaction (pp. 134-184). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12. Fox, B. (1995, July). On the embodied nature of grammar: Embodied being-in-the-world. Paper presented at the International Conference on Functional Approaches to Grammar, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
13. Fox, B., Hayashi, M., & Jasperson, R. (1996). Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Grammar and interaction (pp. 185-237). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97-121). New York: Irvington.
15. Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic.
16. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. Papers in Pragmatics, 1, 1-54.
17. Goodwin, M. H. (1995, July). Games of stance: Conflict and footing in hopscotch. Paper presented at the Symposium on Conversation, Albuquerque, NM.
18. Grosjean, F. (1983). How long is the sentence? Prediction and prosody in the on-line processing of language. Linguistics, 21, 501-529.
19. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. San Francisco: HarperCollins.
20. Jasperson, R. (1998). Repair after cut-off. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.
21. Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech. In A. Siegman & B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177-210). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
22. Lehiste, I. (1979). Perception of sentence and paragraph boundaries. In B. Lindblom & S. Ohman (Eds.), Frontiers of speech communication research (pp. 191-201). New York: Academic.
23. Local, J., Kelly, J., & Wells, W. H. G. (1986). Towards a phonology of conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English. Linguistics, 22, 411-437.
24. Local, J., Wells, W. H. G., & Sebba, M. (1985). Phonology for conversation: Phonetic aspects of turn delimitation in London Jamaican. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 309-330.
25. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
27. Sallis, J. (Ed.). (1981). Merleau-Ponty, perception, structure, language. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities.
28. Schaffer, D. (1983). The role of intonation as a cue to topic management in conversation. Journal of Phonetics, 136, 243-257.
29. Schegloff, E. (1984). On some gestures' relation to talk. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 266-296). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
30. Schegloff, E. (1988). Discourse as an interactional achievement II. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding (pp. 135-158). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
31. Schegloff, E. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Grammar and interaction (pp. 52-133). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Streeck, J. (1993). Gesture as communication I. Communication Monographs, 60, 275-299.
33. Wells, B., & Peppe, S. (1996). Ending up in Ulster: Prosody and turn-taking in English dialects. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 101-130). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.