Communication as a practice

Communication as...: Perspectives on theory

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 38-48

  Craig, Robert T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949740050     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781483329055.n5     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Gadamer, H.-G. (1981). Reason in the age of science (F. G.Lawrence, Trans). Cambridge: MIT Press.
2. Perry, D. K. (Ed). (2001). American pragmatism and communication research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
4. Tracy, K. (1997). Colloquium: Dilemmas of academic discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Barge, K. J. (Ed). (2001). Practical theory [special issue]. Communication Theory, 11(2), 5-123. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00230.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00230.x
7. Bourdieu, P. (1992). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8. Cameron, D. (2000). Good to talk? Living and working in a communication culture. London: Sage.
9. Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman.
10. Craig, R. T. (1989). Communication as a practical discipline. In B.Dervin, L.Grossberg, B. J.O'Keefe, & E.Wartella (Eds), Rethinking communication: Vol. 1. Paradigm issues (pp. 97-122). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Craig, R. T. (1993). Why are there so many communication theories? Journal of Communication, 43(3), 26-33. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01273.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01273.x
12. Craig, R. T. (1996a). Practical theory: A reply to Sandelands. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 26, 65-79. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1996.tb00286.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1996.tb00286.x
13. Craig, R. T. (1996b). Practical-theoretical argumentation. Argumentation, 10, 461-474. doi:10.1007/BF00142979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00142979
14. Craig, R. T. (1999a). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9, 119-161.
15. Craig, R. T. (1999b). Metadiscourse, theory, and practice. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 21-29.
16. Craig, R. T. (2001a). Communication. In T. O.Sloane (ed), Encyclopedia of rhetoric (pp. 125-137). New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Craig, R. T. (2001b). Dewey and Gadamer on practical reflection: Toward a methodology for the practical disciplines. In D. K.Perry (ed), American pragmatism and communication research (pp. 131-148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (1995). Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion. Communication Theory, 5, 248-272. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1995.tb00108.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1995.tb00108.x
19. Deetz, S. A. (1994). Future of the discipline: The challenges, the research, and the social contribution. In S. A.Deetz (ed), Communication yearbook 17 (pp. 565-600). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Gadamer, H.-G. (1981). Reason in the age of science (F. G.Lawrence, Trans). Cambridge: MIT Press.
21. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22. Grossberg, L. (1982). The ideology of communication: Post-structuralism and the limits of communication. Man and World, 15(1), 83-102. doi:10.1007/BF01248547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01248547
23. Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
24. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
25. Mattelart, A. (1996). The invention of communication (S.Emanuel, Trans). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
26. Peters, J. D. (1999). Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226922638.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922638.001.0001
27. Philipsen, G. (1975). Speaking 'like a man' in Teamsterville: Culture patterns of role enactment in an urban neighborhood. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 13-22. doi:10.1080/00335637509383264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335637509383264
28. Philipsen, G. (1992). Speaking culturally: Explorations in social communication. Albany: SUNY Press.
29. Sandelands, L. E. (1990). What is so practical about theory? Lewin revisited. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 235-262. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00185.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00185.x
30. Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511527470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527470
31. Schiller, D. (1996). Theorizing communication: A history. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
33. Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173490
34. Tracy, K. (1995). Action-implicative discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 195-215. doi:10.1177/0261927X95141011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X95141011
35. Turner, S. (1994). The social theory of practices: Tradition, tacit knowledge, and presuppositions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.