Comparing the establishment of an invasive and an endemic palm species in the Atlantic rainforest

Plant Ecology and Diversity

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 345-354

  Mengardo, Ana L T ^a   Figueiredo, Cristiano L ^a   Tambosi, Leandro R ^a   Pivello, Vânia R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Archontophoenix cunninghamiana; biological invasion; Euterpe edulis; seed longevity; seed rain; seedling establishment

Indexed keywords

ARCHONTOPHOENIX; ARECACEAE; EUTERPE EDULIS;

EID: 84871349891     PISSN: 17550874     EISSN: 17551668     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2012.735271     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Alpert, P. 2006. The advantages and disadvantages of being introduced. Biological Invasions, 8: 1523-1534.
2. Bakker, JP, Poschlod, P, Strykstra, RJ, Bekker, RM and Thompson, K. 1996. Seed banks and seed dispersal: important topics in restoration ecology. Acta Botanica Neerlandica, 45: 461-490.
3. Baskin, CC and Baskin, JM. 2001. Seeds: ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination, California, USA: Elsevier.
4. Biagioni, LA and Godoy, SAP. 2005. "Germinação de sementes de algumas espécies nativas do cerrado". In O cerrado Pé-de-Gigante-Parque Estadual do Vassununga, Ecologia e Conservação, Edited by: Pivello, VR and Varanda, EM. 112-120. São Paulo, Brazil: Governo do Estado de São Paulo, Secretaria do Meio Ambiente.
5. Bovi, MLA and Cardoso, M. 1975. Germinação de sementes de palmiteiro (Euterpe edulis Mart.) II. Bragantia, 7: 24-34.
6. Brancalion, PHS, Novembre, ADLC and Rodrigues, RR. 2011. Seed development, yield and quality of two palm species growing in different tropical forest types in SE Brazil: implications for ecological restoration. Seed Science and Technology, 39: 412-424.
7. Brasil Ministério da Agricultura e Reforma Agrária. 1992a. "Teste de Germinação". In Ministério da Agricultura e Reforma Agrária. Regras para análise de sementes, 79-138. Brasília, Brazil: Secretaria Nacional de Defesa Agropecuária/DNDV-CLAV.
8. Brasil Ministério da Agricultura e Reforma Agrária. 1992b. "Teste de Tetrazólio". In Ministério da Agricultura e Reforma Agrária. Regras para análise de sementes, 140-181. Brasília, Brazil: Secretaria Nacional de Defesa Agropecuária/DNDV-CLAV.
9. Burnham, KP and Anderson, DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information-theoretical approach, New York, USA: Springer.
10. Castro, J, Zamora, R, Hódar, JA and Gómez, JM. 2004. Seedling establishment of a boreal tree species (Pinus sylvestris) at its southernmost distribution limit: consequences of being in a marginal Mediterranean habitat. Journal of Ecology, 92: 266-277.
11. Christianini, A. 2006. Fecundidade, dispersão e predação de sementes de Archontophoenix cunninghamiana H. Wendl. & Drude, uma palmeira invasora da Mata Atlântica. Revista Brasileira de Botânica, 29: 587-594.
12. Colautti, RI, Grigorovich, IA and MacIsaac, HJ. 2006. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biological Invasions, 8: 1023-1037.
13. Cronk, QCB and Fuller, JL. 1995. Plant invaders, London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
14. Cutway, HB and Ehrenfeld, JG. 2010. The influence of urban land use on seed dispersal and wetland invasibility. Plant Ecology, 210: 153-167.
15. Dislich, R. 2002. Análise da vegetação arbórea e conservação na Reserva Florestal da Cidade Universitária 'Armando de Salles Oliveira', São Paulo, SP: [Ph.D. Thesis]. [São Paulo, Brazil]: Universidade de São Paulo.
16. Dislich, R, Kisser, N and Pivello, VR. 2002. A invasão de um fragmento florestal em São Paulo (SP) pela palmeira australiana Archontophoenix cunninghamiana H. Wendl. & Drude. Revista Brasileira de Botânica, 25: 55-64.
17. Dislich, R and Pivello, VR. 2002. Tree structure and species composition changes in an urban tropical forest fragment (São Paulo, Brasil) during a five-year interval. Boletim Botânico da Universidade de São Paulo, 20: 1-11.
18. Drake, DR. 1998. Relationships among the seed rain, seed bank and vegetation of a Hawaiian forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 9: 103-112.
19. Elton, CS. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants, London, UK: Methuen.
20. Ferrera, AE and Galetto, L. 2010. From seed production to seedling establishment: important steps in an invasive process. Acta Oecologica, 36: 211-218.
21. Fine, PVA. 2002. The invasibility of tropical forests by exotic plants. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 18: 687-705.
22. França-Neto, JB, Krzyzanowski, FC and Costa, NP. 1998. O teste de tetrazólio em sementes de soja, Londrina, Brazil: EMBRAPA-CNPSo.
23. Galetti, M and Aleixo, A. 1998. Effects of palm heart harvesting on avian frugivores in the Atlantic rain forest of Brazil. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35: 286-293.
24. Galetti, M and Fernandez, JC. 1998. Palm heart harvesting in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: changes in industry structure and the illegal trade. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35: 294-301.
25. Galetti, M, Ziparro, VB and Morelatto, LPC. 1999. Fruiting phenology and frugivory on the palm Euterpe edulis in a lowland Atlantic forest of Brazil. Ecotropica, 5: 115-122.
26. Genini, J, Galetti, M and Morellato, LPC. 2009. Fruiting phenology of palms and trees in an Atlantic rainforest land-bridge island. Flora, 204: 131-145.
27. Global Invasive Species Database. 2005. Archontophoenix cunninghamiana. http://www.issg.org/database/species/search.asp?sts=sss&st=sss&fr=1&Image1.x=18&Image1.y=12&sn=Archontophoenix+cunninghamiana&rn=&hci=-1&ei=-1&lang=EN
28. Gurevitch, J, Scheiner, SM and Fox, GA. 2002. The ecology of plants, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers.
29. Hasui, E and Höfling, E. 1998. Preferência alimentar das aves frugívoras de um fragmento de floresta estacional semi-decídua secundária, São Paulo, Brasil. Iheringia, 84: 43-64.
30. Henderson, A and Galeano, G. 1996. Euterpe, Prestoea and Neonicholsonia (Palmae), New York, NY: The New York Botanical Garden.
31. Herrera, CM, Jordano, P, Lopez-Soria, L and Amat, JA. 1994. Recruitment of a mast-fruiting, bird-dispersed tree: bridging frugivore activity and seedling establishment. Ecological Monographs, 64: 315-344.
32. Hierro, JL, Maron, JL and Callaway, RM. 2005. A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. Journal of Ecology, 93: 5-15.
33. ISTA (International Seed Testing Association). 1993. International rules for seed testing. Seed Science and Technology, 21: 1-75.
34. Joly, A. 1950. Estudo fitogeográfico dos campos do Butantã. Boletim da Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras da Universidade de São Paulo, Botânica, 8: 5-68.
35. Köppen, W. 1948. Climatologia: com um estúdio de los climas de la tierra, D.F, México: Fundo de Cultura Econômica.
36. Lorenzi, H, Cerqueira, LSC, Costa, JTM and Ferreira, E. 2004. Palmeiras brasileiras e exóticas cultivadas, Nova Odessa, Brazil: Instituto Plantarum.
37. Lunt, ID. 1995. Seed longevity of six native forbs in a closed Themeda triandra grassland. Australian Journal of Botany, 43: 439-449.
38. rd, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
39. Mantovani, A and Morellato, LPC. 2000. Fenologia da floração, frutificação, mudança foliar e aspectos da biologia floral do palmiteiro. Sellowia, 45/48: 23-38.
40. Martin, PH and Canham, CD. 2010. Dispersal and recruitment limitation in native versus exotic tree species: life-history strategies and Janzen-Connell effects. Oikos, 119: 807-824.
41. Martin, PH, Canham, CD and Marks, PL. 2009. Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7: 142-149.
42. McAlpine, KG and Jesson, LK. 2008. Linking seed dispersal, germination and seedling recruitment in the invasive species Berberis darwinii (Darwin's barberry). Plant Ecology, 197: 119-129.
43. Meerow AW. [cited] 2004. Palm seed germination. Environmental Horticulture Department, document BUL274. University of Florida (USA): IFAS Extension. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu
44. Mengardo, ALT and Pivello, VR. 2012. Phenology and fruit traits of Archontophoenix cunninghamiana, an invasive palm tree in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. Ecotropica, 18: 45-54.
45. Myers, N, Mittermeier, RA, Mittermeier, CG, da Fonseca, GAB and Kent, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403: 853-858.
46. Oliveira, MCP, Ferraz, IDK and Oliveira, GJ. 2006. Dispersão e superação da dormência de sementes de Parkia pendula (Willd.) Walp. (visgueiro) na Amazônia Central, AM, Brasil. Hoehnea, 33: 485-493.
47. Panetta, FD. Seed banks: the bane of the weed eradicator. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Australian Weeds Conference. Wagga Wagga, Australia. pp.523-526.
48. Perrings, C, Dehnen-Schmutz, K, Touza, J and Williamson, M. 2005. How to manage biological invasions under globalization. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20: 212-215.
49. Petenon, D and Pivello, VR. 2008. Plantas invasoras. representatividade da pesquisa dos países tropicais no contexto mundial. Natureza e Conservação, 6: 65-77.
50. Pillar, VD. 2005. MULTIV: multivariate exploratory analysis, randomization testing and bootstrap resampling, Porto Alegre, Brazil: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
51. Pivello, VR, Petenon, D, Jesus, FM, Meirelles, ST, Vidal, MM, Alonso, RAS, Franco, GADC and Metzger, JP. 2006. Chuva de sementes em fragmentos de floresta Atlântica (São Paulo SP, Brasil), sob diferentes situações de conectividade, estrutura florestal e proximidade da borda. Acta Botânica Brasílica, 20: 845-859.
52. Pompeia, SL, Pradella, DZA, Martins, SE, Santos, RC and Diniz, KM. 1989. A semeadura aérea na Serra do Mar em Cubatão. Ambiente, 3: 13-19.
53. Pradella, DZA, Pompeia, SL, Martins, SE, Diniz, KM and Pradella, JGC. 1989. Peletização de sementes em gel hidrofílico. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, 11: 43-52.
54. Queiroz, MH. 2000. Biologia do fruto, da semente e da germinação do palmiteiro Euterpe edulis Martius-Arecaceae. Sellowia, 45/48: 39-59.
55. R Development Core Team. 2010. R: a language and environmental for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org (Accessed: 15 October 2010).
56. Reis, A and Kageyama, PY. 2000. Dispersão de sementes do palmiteiro (Euterpe edulis Martius-Palmae). Sellowia, 45/48: 60-92.
57. Reis, MS, Fantini, AC, Nodari, RO, Reis, A, Guerra, MP and Mantovani, A. 2000. Management and conservation of natural populations in Atlantic Rain Forest: the case study of palm heart (Euterpe edulis Martius). Biotropica, 32: 894-902.
58. Rejmánek, M. 1996. A theory of seed plant invasiveness: the first sketch. Biological Conservation, 78: 171-181.
59. Ribeiro, MC, Metzger, JP, Martensen, AC, Ponzoni, FJ and Hirota, MM. 2009. The Brazilian Atlantic forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 142: 1141-1153.
60. Rossi, L. 1994. A flora arbórea-arbustiva da mata da Reserva da Cidade Universitária 'Armando de Salles Oliveira' (São Paulo, Brasil). Boletim do Instituto de Botânica, 9: 1-105.
61. Schupp, EW. 1993. Quantity, quality and the effectiveness of seed dispersal by animals. Vegetatio, 107/108: 15-29.
62. Silva Matos, DM, Freckleton, RP and Watkinson, AR. 1999. The role of density dependence in the population dynamics of a tropical palm. Ecology, 80: 2635-2650.
63. Silva Matos, DM and Pivello, VR. 2009. O impacto das plantas invasoras nos recursos naturais de ambientes terrestres: alguns casos brasileiros. Ciência e Cultura (SBPC), 61: 27-30.
64. Silva Matos, DM and Watkinson, AR. 1998. The fecundity, seed, and seedling ecology of the edible palm Euterpe edulis in Southeastern Brazil. Biotropica, 30: 595-603.
65. Thompson, K, Ceriani, RM, Bakker, JP and Bekker, RM. 2003. Are seed dormancy and persistence in soil related?. Seed Science Research, 13: 97-100.
66. van Kleunen, M, Weber, E and Fischer, M. 2010. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecology Letters, 13: 235-245.
67. Varanda, EM. 1977. Balanço hídrico de espécies da Mata do Butantã, São Paulo (SP). [MSc Dissertation], São Paulo, Brazil: Universidade de São Paulo.
68. Veloso, HP, Rangel Filho, ALR and Lima, JCA. 1991. Classificação da vegetação brasileira, adaptada a um sistema universal, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: IBGE.
69. Vilà, M, Espinar, JL, Hejda, M, Hulme, PE, Jarosik, V, Maron, JL, Pergl, J, Schaffner, U, Sun, Y and Pysek, P. 2011. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 14: 702-708.
70. Vilà, M and Weiner, J. 2004. Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species? Evidence from pair-wise experiments. Oikos, 105: 229-238.
71. Vitousek, PM, DAntonio, CM, Loope, LL, Rejmánek, M and Westbrooks, R. 1997. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 21: 1-16.
72. Waterhouse, JT and Quinn, CJ. 1978. Growth patterns in the stem of the palm Archontophoenix cunninghamiana. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 77: 73-93.
73. Zenni, RD and Ziller, SR. 2011. An overview of invasive plants in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Botânica, 34: 431-446.
74. Zupo, T and Pivello, VR. Acompanhamento da invasão de um fragmento florestal urbano (São Paulo, SP) pela palmeira australiana Archontophoenix cunninghamiana. Poster session presented at: 7th Congresso de Ecologia do Brasil. Caxambu, Brazil. Edited by: Wendl, H. and Drude.