Negotiation Outcome Classification Using Language Features

Group Decision and Negotiation

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 135-151

  Twitchell, Douglas P ^a   Jensen, Matthew L ^b   Derrick, Douglas C ^c   Burgoon, Judee K ^d   Nunamaker, Jay F ^d  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Language features; Machine learning; Negotiation; Negotiation outcome; Speech acts

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871348803     PISSN: 09262644     EISSN: 15729907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-012-9301-y     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Austin J L (1962) How to do things with words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Bartos OJ (1964) A model of negotiation and the recency effect. Sociometry 27(3): 311-326.
3. Carberry S, Lambert L (1999) A process model for recognizing communicative acts and modeling negotiation subdialogues. Comput Linguist 25(1): 1-53.
4. Chang MK, Woo CC (1994) A speech-act-based negotiation protocol: design, implementation, and test use. ACM Trans Inf Syst (TOIS) 12(4): 360-382.
5. Donohue WA, Ramesh C, Kaufman G, Smith R (1991) Crisis bargaining: tracking relational paradox in hostage negotiation. Int J Group Tens 21: 133-145.
6. Donohue WA, Roberto J (1996) An empirical examination of three models of integrative and distributive bargaining. Int J Confl Manag 7(3): 209-229.
7. Freitas AA, Wieser DC, Apweiler R (2010) On the importance of comprehensible classification models for protein function prediction. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf (TCBB) 7: 172-182.
8. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2006) Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
9. Hall MA (1998) Correlation-based feature subset selection for machine learning. Hamilton, New Zealand.
10. Hall MA, Smith LA (1998) Practical feature subset selection for machine learning. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 21st Australasian computer science conference, Perth.
11. Kersten GE, Noronha SJ (1999) WWW-based negotiation support: design, implementation, and use. Decis Support Syst 25(2): 135-154.
12. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159-174.
13. Leech G, Svartvik J (2002) A communicative grammar of English. Pearson Longman, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
14. Pennebaker JW, Chung CK, Ireland M, Gonzales A, Booth RJ (2007) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC 2007, Austin, TX: LIWC. net.
15. Pennebaker JW, Mayne TJ, Francis ME (1997) Linguistic predictors of adaptive bereavement. J Pers Soc Psychol 72: 863-871.
16. Putnam LL (1990) Reframing integrative and distributive bargaining: a process perspective. Res Negot Organ 2: 3-30.
17. Putnam LL, Jones TS (1990) The role of communication in bargaining. Hum Commun Res 8(3): 262-280.
18. Searle JR (1979) A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In: Expression and meaning: studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, UK, pp 1-29.
19. Sebenius JK (1992) Negotiation analysis: a characterization and review. Manag Sci 38(1): 18-38.
20. Shevade SK, Keerthi SS, Bhattacharyya C, Murthy KRK (2000) Improvements to the SMO algorithm for SVM regression. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 11(5): 1188-1193.
21. Sinaceur M, Neale MA (2005) Not all threats are created equal: how implicitness and timing affect the effectiveness of threats in negotiations. Group Decis Negotiat 14(1): 63-85.
22. Smola AJ, Schoelkopf B. (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput 14: 199-222.
23. Sokolova M, Szpakowicz S (2005) Analysis and classification of strategies in electronic negotiations. In: Kegal B, Lapalme G (eds) Advances in artificial intelligence (Proceedings of the 18th conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence, Canadian AI 2005, held in Victoria, Canada in May 2005). Springer, New York, NY, pp 145-157.
24. Sokolova M, Szpakowicz S. (2007) Strategies and language trends in learning success and failure of negotiation. Group Decis Negotiat 16(6): 469-484.
25. Stolcke A, Ries K, Coccaro N, Shriberg E, Bates R, Jurafsky D et al (2000) Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Comput Linguist 26(3): 339-373.
26. Twitchell DP, Nunamaker JF (2004) Speech act profiling: a probabilistic method for analyzing persistent conversations and their participants. Paper presented at the thirty-seventh annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (CD/ROM), Big Island, Hawaii.
27. Walton RE, McKersie RB (1991) A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: an analysis of a social. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
28. Whissell C (1989) The dictionary of affect in language. In: Plutchnik R, Kellerman H (eds) Emotion: theory, research and experience. Academic Press, New York, NY, p 113.
29. Whissell C, Fournier M, Pelland R, Weir D, Makarec K (1986) A dictionary of affect in language: IV. Reliability, validity, and applications. Percept Mot Skills 62: 875-888.
30. Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ.
31. Witten IE, Frank E (2005) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
32. Zhou L, Burgoon JK, Nunamaker JF, Twitchell DP (2004a) Automated linguistics based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communication: an empirical investigation. Group Decis Negotiat 13(1): 81-106.
33. Zhou L, Twitchell DP, Qin T, Burgoon JK, Nunamaker JF (2004b) Toward the automatic prediction of deception-an empirical comparison of classification methods. J Manag Inf Syst 20(4): 139-166.