Malliavin weight sampling for computing sensitivity coefficients in brownian dynamics simulations

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 109, Issue 25, 2012, Pages

  Warren, Patrick B ^a   Allen, Rosalind J ^b  

^a UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUXILIARY VARIABLES; BROWNIAN DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; COMPUTING PARAMETERS; DYNAMICAL OBJECTS; MALLIAVIN WEIGHT; NON EQUILIBRIUM; PARTICLE POSITION; PROBABILITY DENSITIES; RESPONSE COEFFICIENT; SENSITIVITY COEFFICIENT; STEADY STATE; TIME-DEPENDENT SYSTEMS;

ATOMIC PHYSICS; PHYSICS;

BROWNIAN MOVEMENT;

EID: 84871314930     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.250601     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. P.M. Chaikin and T.C. Lubensky, Principles of Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
2. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications (Academic, San Diego, CA, 2002), 2nded.
3. P. Hänggi and H. Thomas, Phys. Rep. 88, 207 (1982). PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/0370-1573(82)90045-X
4. L.F. Cugliando, J. Kurchan, and G. Parisi, J. Phys. I (France) 4, 1641 (1994). JPGCE8 1155-4304 10.1051/jp1:1994212
5. J. Prost, J.-F. Joanny, and J.M.R. Parrondo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 090601 (2009). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.090601
6. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.109.250601 for the proof of Eqs., practical implementation notes, the extensions to underdamped Brownian dynamics and higher-order derivatives, the derivations of Eq. and the quasi-FDT result for the 2D trap, the connection to linear response theory, and some remarks on the adjunct method of Refs..
7. G. Ciccotti and G. Jacucci, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 789 (1975). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.789
8. P. L'Ecuyer, Ann. Oper. Res. 39, 121 (1992). AOREEV 0254-5330 10.1007/BF02060938
9. M. Rathinam, P.W. Sheppard, and M. Khammash, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 034103 (2010). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.3280166
10. D. Nualart, The Malliavin Calculus and Related Topics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2006);
11. D.R. Bell, The Malliavin Calculus (Dover, Mineola, NY, 2006).
12. E. Fournié, J.-M. Lasry, J. Lebuchoux, P.-L. Lions, and N. Touzi, Finance Stochast. 3, 391 (1999); 0949-2984 10.1007/s007800050068
13. For an approach similar in spirit to the present one, see N. Chen and P. Glasserman, Stoch. Proc. Appl. 117, 1689 (2007). STOPB7 0304-4149 10.1016/j.spa.2007.03.012 (Pubitemid 47419182)
14. L. Berthier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 220601 (2007). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.220601 (Pubitemid 47139695)
15. A. Plyasunov and A.P. Arkin, J. Comput. Phys. 221, 724 (2007). JCTPAH 0021-9991 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.06.047
16. P.B. Warren and R.J. Allen, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 104106 (2012). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.3690092
17. D.L. Ermak and J.A. McCammon, J. Chem. Phys. 69, 1352 (1978); JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.436761
18. M.P. Allen and D.J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987).
19. P.T. Korda, G.C. Spalding, and D.G. Grier, Phys. Rev. B 66, 024504 (2002); PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.024504
20. D.M. Carberry, J.C. Reid, G.M. Wang, E.M. Sevick, D.J. Searles, and D.J. Evans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 140601 (2004); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 92.140601
21. Y. Roichman, B. Sun, A. Stolarski, and D.G. Grier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 128301 (2008); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.128301
22. M. Khan and A.K. Sood, Europhys. Lett. 94, 60003 (2011). EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/94/60003